Skip to main content
Full-Length Research Report

Measuring Generativity in Older Adults

The Development of New Scales

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000030

Erikson already emphasized the importance of remaining generative in old age. Current instruments designed to measure generativity, however, were developed to be used with middle-aged adults. In a sample of older adults (N = 195), three newly developed instruments measuring different facets of generativity, each with several scales, were applied and tested with regard to methodological issues (internal structure, internal consistency of scales), bivariate associations with established instruments of generativity and social desirability, and age and gender differences. The study results confirmed that the theoretically assumed factor structure and characteristics of the scales support the assessment of generativity in a multidimensional way in older adults. Positive associations with the Loyola Generativity Scale (LGS) demonstrate a positive validation result.

References

  • Ackerman, S., Zuroff, D. C., Moskowitz, D. S. (2000). Generativity in midlife and young adults: Links to agency, communion, and subjective well-being. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 50, 17–41. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • An, J. S., Cooney, T. M. (2006). Psychological well-being in mid to late life: The role of generativity development and parent-child relationships across the lifespan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 410–421. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baltes, P. B., Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes M. M. BaltesEds., Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bühner, M. (2004). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Introduction to testing and scale construction]. München: Pearson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carmel, S., Bernstein, J. (2003). Gender differences in physical health and psychosocial well-being among four age-groups of elderly people in Israel. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 56, 113–131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dittmann-Kohli, F. (1995). Das persönliche Sinnsystem [The personal meaning system]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton, Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erikson, E. H., Erikson, J. M. (1997). The life cycle completed: Extended version with new chapters on the ninth stage of development. New York: Norton & Comp. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erikson, J. M., Erikson, E. H., Kivnick, H. (1986). Vital involvement in old age. New York: Norton & Comp. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fisher, B. J. (1995). Successful aging, life satisfaction, and generativity in later life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41, 239–250. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hagestad, G. O., Uhlenberg, P. (2006). Should we be concerned about age segregation? Some theoretical and empirical explorations. Research on Aging, 28, 638–653. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoare, C. H. (2002). Erikson on Development in Adulthood: New Insights from the Unpublished Papers. New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Höpflinger, F., Hummel, C., Hugentobler, V. (2006). Enkelkinder und ihre Großeltern: Intergenerationelle Beziehungen im Wandel [Grandchildren and their grandparents: Changing generational relationships]. Zürich: Seismo. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Keyes, C. L. M., Ryff, C. D. (1998). Generativity and adult lives: Social structural contours and quality of life consequences. In D. P. McAdams E. de St. AubinEds., Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation (pp. 227–263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kotre, J. (1984). Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kotre, J. (1996). Outliving the self: How we live on in future generations. New York: Norton & Co. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kruse, A., Wahl, H.-W (2009). Zukunft Altern: Individuelle und gesellschaftliche Weichenstellungen [The future of aging: Individual and societal directions]. Heidelberg: Spektrum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, F., Baltes, M. (1997). Brauchen alte Menschen junge Menschen? Überlegungen zu den Entwicklungsaufgaben im hohen Lebensalter. In L. Krappmann, A. Lepenies, (Hrsg.), Alt und jung. Spannung und Solidarität zwischen den Generationen [Old and young: Tension and solidarity between generations] (pp. 161–184). Frankfurt/M.: Campus Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lugmayr, F. (2010). Großelternschaft und großelterliche Generativität aus der Sicht der Enkel und Enkelinnen [Grandparenthood and generativity from the point of view of grandchildren]. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Salzburg. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Manheimer, R. J. (1995). Redeeming the aging self: John Kotre, George Drury, and Cultural Generativity. Journal of Aging Studies, 9, 13–20. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McAdams, D., St. Aubin, E. de (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McAdams, D., St. Aubin, E. de, Logan, R. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKeering, H., Pakenham, K. I. (2000). Gender and generativity issues in parenting: Do fathers benefit more than mothers from involvement in child care activities? Sex Roles, 43, 459–480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ochse, R., Plug, C. (1986). Cross-cultural investigation of the validity of Erikson’s theory of personality development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1240–1252. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, B. E., Smirles, K. A., Wentworth, P. A. (1997). Generativity and authoritarianism: Implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1202–1216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snarey, J. (1993). How fathers care for the next generation. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • St. Aubin, E. de, McAdams, D. (1995). The relations of generative concern and generative action to personality traits, satisfaction/happiness with life, and ego development. Journal of Adult Development, 2, 99–112. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vaillant, G. E. (2002). Aging well: Surprising guideposts to a happier life from the landmark Harvard study of adult development. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar