Ageism Affects the Future Time Perspective of Older Adults
Abstract
Abstract. These studies tested whether ageism affects the future time perspective (FTP) of older adults. Ageism occurs when someone is classified as “old” and is judged or treated differently as a result. To mimic this, we recruited participants (aged 50+) from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. We made their age salient, exposed them to negative aging stereotypes, and asked them to complete Carstensen and Lang’s (1996) FTP Scale. Across multiple studies, participants assigned to the ageism conditions rated their futures as having fewer opportunities. This effect was mediated by mood and did not occur for younger adult participants. In addition, as the personal experiences of older adults with ageism increased, their perception of futures opportunities decreased. Thus, ageism reduces the future opportunities older adults see for themselves.
References
(2012). Experiences and expressions of ageism: Topline results (UK) from round 4 of the European Social Survey, ESS Country Specific Topline Results (2). London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys.
(2008). Age differences in forgiveness: The role of future time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1137–1147.
(2014). The rules of implicit evaluation by race, religion, and age. Psychological Science, 25, 1804–1815.
(2014). Perceived age, gender, and racial/ethnic discrimination in Europe: Results from the European Social Survey. Educational Gerontology, 40, 499–517.
(2010). The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: A study among older workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 474–486.
(2014). Measuring future time perspective across adulthood: Development and evaluation of a brief multidimensional questionnaire. The Gerontologist, 54, 1075–1088.
(2016). Future time perspective and awareness of age-related change: Examining their role in predicting psychological well-being. Psychology and Aging, 31, 605–617.
(1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9, 243–246.
(1975). Psychiatry and the elderly: An overview. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 893–900.
(2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.
(1996). Future Time Perspective Scale. Unpublished measure.
(1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.
(2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: Maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychology and Aging, 22, 186–201.
(2008). Age differences in forgiveness: The role of future time perspective. Psychology and Aging, 23, 676–680.
(2009). Awareness of age-related change: Examination of a (mostly) unexplored concept. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65, 340–350.
(2013).
An analysis of the use of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk for survey research in the cloud . In ICCSM2013-Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Security Management: ICCSM 2013 (p. 10). Academic Conferences Limited.(2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging, 21, 664–678.
(1990). Choosing social partners: How old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. Psychology and Aging, 5, 335–347.
(2006). Goals change when life’s fragility is primed: Lessons learned from older adults, the September 11 attacks and SARS. Social Cognition, 24, 248–278.
(1999). Influence of time on social preferences: Implications for life-span development. Psychology and Aging, 14, 595–604.
(2001). Age differences in social preferences among Taiwanese and Mainland Chinese: the role of perceived time. Psychology and Aging, 16, 351–356.
(2012). Future time perspective and health behaviors: Temporal framing of self-regulatory processes in physical exercise and dietary behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, 208–218.
(2016). The limits of a limited future time perspective in explaining age differences in emotional functioning. Psychology and Aging, 31, 583–593.
(2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford.
(2006). Age-related variation in the influences of aging stereotypes on memory in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 21, 621–625.
(2004). Explicit and implicit stereotype activation effects on memory: do age and awareness moderate the impact of priming? Psychology and Aging, 19, 495–505.
(1992). Time estimation and orientation mediated by transient mood. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 21, 209–227.
(1990). Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: A comparison of structure and evaluations. Psychology and Aging, 5, 182–193.
(2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 166–175.
(2011). How changes in subjective general health predict future time perspective, and development and generativity motives over the lifespan. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 228–247.
(2011). When time is running out: Changes in positive future perception and their relationships to changes in well-being in old age. Psychology and Aging, 26, 381–387.
(2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17, 125–139.
(1988). The motivational significance of future time perspective: The homecoming of a concept. Psychologica, 1, 27–46.
(1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1092–1107.
(2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 433–442.
(2008). Ageism revisited: A study measuring ageism in East Tennessee, USA. Nursing and Health Sciences, 10(1), 11–16.
(2007). The Adolescent Time Inventory-English. Berkeley: The University of California.
(2016). Psychometric properties of time attitudes scores in young, middle, and older adult samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 57–61.
(1989). “ You’re only as old as you feel”: self-perceptions of age, fears of aging, and life satisfaction from adolescence to old age. Psychology and Aging, 4, 73–78.
(1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11, 1–59.
(1999). Ageism negative and positive (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
(2001). The ageism survey: First findings. The Gerontologist, 41, 572–575.
(2004). Research note: Ageism in Canada and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 19(1), 41–46.
(2002).
Ageist behavior . In T. NelsonEd., Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 201–246). Boston: MIT.(1979). Future time perspective in later adulthood: Review and research directions. Experimental Aging Research, 5, 43–88.
(2017). A three-component model of future time perspective across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 32, 597–607.
(2006). People over forty feel 20% younger than their age: Subjective age across the lifespan. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 776–780.
(2012). Common (mis)beliefs about memory: A replication and comparison of telephone and Mechanical Turk survey methods. PLOS One, 7(12), e51876.
(2015). How old do you feel? The role of age discrimination and biological aging in subjective age. PloS one, 10(3), e0119293.
(2016). Future perspective and healthy lifestyle choices in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 31, 618–630.
(2016). The end is (not) near: Aging, essentialism, and future time perspective. Developmental Psychology, 52, 996–1009.
(2012). “They” are old but “I” feel younger: Age-group dissociation as a self-protective strategy in old age. Psychology and Aging, 27, 153–163.
(2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: Relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychology and Aging, 24, 487–493.
(2011). Relations between chronic regulatory focus and future time perspective: Results of a cross-lagged structural equation model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1255–1260.
