Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.257

Processing strategies in risk assessment were studied in an Internet experiment. Women (N = 399) who were either low or high in rape myth acceptance (RMA) were asked to recall either two or six behaviors that either increase or decrease the risk of being sexually assaulted. Later they judged their personal vulnerability to sexual assault under either no time pressure (no response deadline) or time pressure (response deadline of 5 s). Without time pressure, the results were opposite to previous research: Women low in RMA relied on ease of recall and reported higher vulnerability after recalling few rather than many risk increasing behaviors, or many rather than few risk-decreasing behaviors; women high in RMA relied on the amount of information recalled, which resulted in an opposite pattern of vulnerability judgments. No influences of ease of recall or amount recalled on vulnerability judgments were detected under time pressure.

References

  • Aquilino, W. S., Wright, D. L., Supple, A. J.(2000). Response effects due to bystander presence in CASI and paper-and-pencil surveys of drug use and alcohol use. Substance Use and Misuse, 35, 845– 867 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Belli, R. F., Winkielman, P., Read, J. D., Schwarz, N., Lynn, S. J.(1998). Recalling more childhood events leads to judgments of poorer memory: Implications for the recovered/false memory debate. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 318– 323 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bohner, G.(1998). Vergewaltigungsmythen: Sozialpsychologische Untersuchungen über täterentlastende und opferfeindliche Überzeugungen im Bereich sexueller Gewalt [Rape myths: Social psychological studies on beliefs that exonerate assailants and blame victims in the area of sexual violence]. Landau, Germany: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bohner, G., Lampridis, E. (in press) Expecting to meet a rape victim affects women’s self-esteem: The moderating role of rape myth acceptance. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B., Chaiken, S.(1995). The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 33– 68 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bohner, G., Siebler, F., Raaijmakers, Y.(1999). Salience of rape affects self-esteem: Individual versus collective self-aspects. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 191– 199 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bohner, G., Weisbrod, C., Raymond, P., Barzvi, A., Schwarz, N.(1993). Salience of rape affects self-esteem: The moderating role of gender and rape myth acceptance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 561– 579 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burt, M. R.(1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217– 230 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., Jarvis, W. B. G.(1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197– 253 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, S., Chaiken, S.(1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 73– 96 New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., Chaiken, S.(1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Feldman, P. J., Ullman, J. B., Dunkel-Schetter, C.(1998). Women’s reactions to rape victims: Motivational processes associated with blame and social support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 469– 503 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feigelson, M. E., Dwight, S. A.(2000). Can asking questions by computer improve the candidness of responding? A meta-analytic perspective. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 52, 248– 255 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gerbert, B., Bronstone, A., Pantilat, S., McPhee, S., Allerton, M., Moe, J.(1999). When asked, patients tell: Disclosure of sensitive health-risk behaviors. Medical Care, 37, 104– 111 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Grayson, C. E., Schwarz, N.(1999). Beliefs influence information processing strategies: Declarative and experiential information in risk assessment. Social Cognition, 17, 1– 18 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joinson, A. N.(2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177– 192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., Wisniewski, N.(1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162– 170 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Locke, S. D., Gilbert, B. O.(1995). Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experiential differences: A study of computer, questionnaire, and interview assessment formats. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 255– 263 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lonsway, K. A., Fitzgerald, L. F.(1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133– 164 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, L. L., Abend, T., Sedikides, C., Green, J. D.(1997). How would I feel if. . .? Mood as input to a role fulfillment evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 242– 253 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, L. L., Stapel, D. A.(1998). Correction and metacognition: Are people naive dogmatists or naive empiricists during social judgments? In V. Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, & B. Dardenne (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions. (pp. 228– 247 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., Wyer, R. S. Jr.(1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317– 326 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGraw, K. O., Tew, M. D., Williams, J. E.(2000). The integrity of Web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data?. Psychological Science, 11, 502– 506 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., Greenwald, A. G.(2002). E-research: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 161– 176 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Over seksueel geweld, (2000, July 2). TransAct. p.6. [Online available: www.transact.nl/vragen641.htm]. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., Fitzgerald, L. F.(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27– 68 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T.(1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69– 81 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poppen, P. J., Segal, N. J.(1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 9, 689– 701 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reips, U.-D.(2000). The Web experiment method: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 89– 117 San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., Drasgow, F.(1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 754– 775 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rothman, A. J., Schwarz, N.(1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053– 1064 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, W. C.(2000). The server side of psychology Web experiments. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 285– 310 ). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N.(1998). Accessible content and accessible experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87– 99 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N., Bless, H.(1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgment (pp. 217– 245 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., Simons, A.(1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195– 202 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, E. R.(1994). Procedural knowledge and processing strategies in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 99– 151 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N.(2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, NCJ 183781. [Online available: www.ojp.usdoj.gov]. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.(1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207– 232 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wänke, M., Bohner, G., Jurkowitsch, A.(1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes?. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 170– 177 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wänke, M., Schwarz, N., Bless, H.(1995). The availability heuristic revisited: Experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates. Acta Psychologica, 89, 83– 90 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., Schooler, T. Y.(2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101– 126 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar