Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000127

Zusammenfassung. Die epidemiologische Beschreibung von Internetabhängigkeit und die Entwicklung von Interventionen erfordern eine reliable und ökonomische Erfassungsmethode von Internetabhängigkeit. Die Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) erfasst die Kernelemente von Internetabhängigkeit mit 14 Items, allerdings fehlten bisher bevölkerungsrepräsentative Normwerte für die deutsche Version der CIUS. In der vorliegenden Studie werden nun teststatistische Kennwerte und Normwerte für die deutsche Version der CIUS vorgelegt. 8 132 Personen aus der Allgemeinbevölkerung (14 – 64 Jahren) mit einer durchschnittlichen privaten Internetnutzung von einer Stunde oder länger, an mindestens einem Tag in der Woche oder am Wochenende beantworteten die CIUS. Insgesamt weist die CIUS gute psychometrische Eigenschaften auf und die vorgelegten Normwerte bieten die Möglichkeit für Vergleiche von individuellen Werten mit denen der internetnutzenden Bevölkerung.


Psychometric Properties and Norm Values of the German Version of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS)

Abstract. A reliable and economic assessment of Internet addiction is essential for the epidemiological characterization and the development of interventions. The Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) assesses core elements of Internet addiction using 14 items. However, no population-based norm values are available for the German version. The present study sought to provide psychometric properties and norm values for a German CIUS version. From the general population, 8,132 subjects (14 – 64 years) with private Internet use for one hour or more on at least one working or weekend day per week answered the CIUS items. The data revealed good psychometric properties for the CIUS. The norm values can be used for comparisons between individual CIUS sum scores and the CIUS sum score distribution within the internet-using population.

Literatur

  • Alavi, S. S., Jannatifard, F., Eslami, M. & Rezapour, H. (2011). Validity, reliability and factor analysis of Compulsive Internet Use Scale in students Internet users of Isfahan’s universities [abstract]. Zugriff am 06. 07. 2012 unter http://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/ him/article/view/204. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Azur, M. J., Stuart, E. A., Frangakis, C. & Leaf, P. J. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work?. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20, 40 – 49. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beard, K. W. & Wolf, E. M. (2001). Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 377 – 383. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bischof, G., Bischof, A., Meyer, C., John, U. & Rumpf, H. J. (2013). Prävalenz der Internetabhängigkeit–Diagnostik und Risikoprofile (PINTA-DIARI). Kompaktbericht an das Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Zugriff am 03. 08. 2014 unter http://drogenbeauftragte.de/fileadmin/dateien-dba/DrogenundSucht/Computerspiele_Internetsucht/Downloads/PINTA-DIARI-2013-Kompaktbericht.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Black, D. W., Belsare, G. & Schlosser, S. (1999). Clinical features, psychiatric comorbidity, and health-related quality of life in persons reporting compulsive computer use behavior. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 60, 839 – 844. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowling, A. (2005). Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health, 27, 281 – 291. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buuren, S. van (2007). Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16, 219 – 242. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caplan, S. E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089 – 1097. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cho, H., Kwon, M., Choi, J.-H., Lee, S.-K., Choi, J. S. & Choi, S.–W., et al. (2014). Development of the Internet Addiction Scale based on the Internet Gaming Disorder criteria suggested in DSM-5. Zugriff am 02. 04. 2014 unter http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460314000215 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chong Guan, N., Isa, S. M., Hashim, A. H., Pillai, S. K. & Harbajan Singh, M. K. (2012). Validity of the Malay version of the Internet Addiction Test: A study on a group of medical students in Malaysia. Zugriff am 26. 09. 2013 unter http://aph.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/05/16/1010539512447808.full.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Craighead, W. E. & Nemeroff, C. B. (2004). The concise corsini encyclopedia of psychology and behavioral science. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cronbach, L. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. New York, NY: Harper and Row. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 187 – 195. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fallows, D. (2004). The Internet and Daily Life. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Zugriff am 10. 07. 2014 unter http://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/PEW/P030811F.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gámez-Guadix, M., Villa-George, F. I. & Calvete, E. (2012). Measurement and analysis of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized problematic Internet use among Mexican adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1581 – 1591. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldstein, G. & Hersen, M. (2000). Handbook of Psychological Assessment. Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Griffiths, M. (1999). Internet addiction: Fact or fiction? Psychologist, 12, 246 – 250. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Griffiths, M. (2000). Does Internet and computer „addiction“ exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 211 – 218. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grohol, J. M. (1999). Too much time online: Internet addiction or healthy social interactions? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2, 395 – 401. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guertler, D., Broda, A., Bischof, A., Kastirke, N., Meerkerk, G. J. & John, U., et al. (2014a). Factor structure of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 46 – 51. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guertler, D., Rumpf, H. J., Bischof, A., Kastirke, N., Petersen, K. U. & John, U., et al. (2014b). Assessment of problematic Internet use by the Compulsive Internet Use Scale and the Internet Addiction Test: A sample of problematic and pathological gamblers. European Addiction Research, 20, 75 – 81. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ha, J., Yu, J. H., Park, D.H., Ryu, S. H. & Kim, S. J. (2012). Usefulness of Young’s Internet Addiction Test for clinical populations. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 22, S. 410. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Atwi, K., Zullino, D., Khan, R. & Billieux, J. (2011). Arabic validation of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS). Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention & Policy, 6, 32. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Horn, A., Achab, S., Thorens, G. & Zullino, D., et al. (2012) French validation of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS). Psychiatric Quarterly, 83, 397 – 405. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • King, D. L. & Delfabbro, P. H. (2013). Issues for DSM-5: Video-gaming disorder? Australien and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 20 – 22. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D. & Binder, J. F. (2013). Internet addiction in students: Prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 959 – 966. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lienert, G. & Raatz, U. (1998). Testaufbau und Testanalyse. Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lortie, C. L. & Guitton, M. J. (2013). Internet addiction assessment tools: Dimensional structure and methodological status. Addiction, 108, 1207 – 1216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meerkerk, G. J., Van Den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., Vermulst, A. A. & Garretsen, H. F. L. (2009). The Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS): Some psychometric properties. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 1 – 6. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, C., Bischof, A., Westram, A., Jeske, C., de Brito, S. & Glorius, S., et al. (in Druck). „Pathological Gambling and Epidemiology“ (PAGE) study program: Design and fieldwork. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Montag, C., Bey, K., Sha, P., Li, M., Chen, Y. & Liu, W. (2014). Is it meaningful to distinguish between generalized and specific Internet addiction? Evidence from a cross-cultural study from Germany, Sweden, Taiwan and China. Zugriff am 10. 07. 2014 unter http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/appy.12122/pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Montag, C., Jurkiewicz, M. & Reuter, M. (2010). Low self-directedness is a better predictor for problematic Internet use than high neuroticism. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1531 – 1535. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moosbrugger, H. & Kelava, A. (2000a). Deskriptivstatistische Evaluation von Items (Itemanalyse) und Testwertverteilungen. In H. MoosbruggerA. KelavaHrsg., Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (S. 74 – 98). Heidelberg: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moosbrugger, H. & Kelava, A. (2000b). Qualitätsanforderungen an einen psychologischen Test (Testgütekriterien). In H. MoosbruggerA. KelavaHrsg., Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (S. 8 – 26). Heidelberg: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, K. W., Glaesmer, H., Brähler, E., Woelfling, K. & Beutel, M. E. (2013). Prevalence of Internet addiction in the general population: Results from a German population-based survey. Zugriff am 10. 09. 2013 unter http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0144929X.2013.810778 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, B. O. & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 38, 171 – 189. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nie, N. H. & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society (SIQSS), Stanford University, and InterSurvey Inc. Zugriff am 10. 07. 2014 unter http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pawlikowski, M. & Brand, M. (2011). Excessive Internet gaming and decision making: Do excessive world of warcraft-players have problems in decision making under risky conditions? Psychiatry Research, 188, 428 – 433. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petersen, K. U. & Thomasius, R. (2010). Beratungs- und Behandlungsangebote zum Pathologischen Internetgebrauch in Deutschland. Endbericht an das Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG). Zugriff am 03. 08. 2014 unter http://www.drogenbeauftragte.de/fileadmin/dateien-dba/DrogenundSucht/Computerspiele_Internetsucht/Downloads/Beratungsangebote_pathologischer_Internetgebrauch_Endbericht_100531_Drogenbeauftragte.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Petry, N. M., Rehbein, F., Gentile, D. A., Lemmens, J. S., Rumpf, H.-J. & Mößle, T., et al. (2014). An international consensus for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder using the new DSM-5 approach. Zugriff am 02. 04 .2014 unter http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.12457/abstract;jsessionid=D3BF045A1C95ECACB451873CC99C622D.f04t04 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peukert, P., Steffen, S., ElKasmi, J., Barth, G. M., Meerkerk, G. J. & Batra, A. (2012). Faktorielle Struktur der deutschen Version der Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) nach konfirmatorischer Faktorenanalyse. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 41, 101 – 108. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rumpf, H.-J., Vermulst, A. A., Bischof, A., Kastirke, N., Guertler, D. & Bischof, G., et al. (2014). Occurrence of Internet addiction in a general population sample. A latent class analysis. European Addiction Research, 20, 159 – 166. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sariyska, R., Reuter, M., Bey, K., Sha, P., Li, M. & Chen, Y.-F., et al. (2014). Self-esteem, personality and Internet addiction: A cross-cultural comparison study. Personality and Individual Differences, 61 – 62, 28 – 33. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schafer, J. L. & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147 – 177. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N. & Vander Bilt, J. (2000). „Computer addiction“: A critical consideration. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70, 162 – 168. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shapira, N. A., Goldsmith, T. D., Keck, P. E. J., Khosla, U. M. & McElroy, S. L. (2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic Internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 57, 267 – 272. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shaw, M. & Black, D. W. (2008). Internet addiction: Definition, assessment, epidemiology and clinical management. CNS Drugs, 22, 353 – 365. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Starcevic, V. (2013). Is Internet addiction a useful concept? Australien and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 16 – 19. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffen, S., Peukert, P., Petersen, K. U. & Batra, A. (2012). Messverfahren zur Erfassung der Internetsucht. Sucht, 58, 401 – 413. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Tao, R., Huang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y. & Li, M. (2010). Proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. Addiction, 105, 556 – 564. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wartberg, L., Petersen, K. U., Kammerl, R., Rosenkranz, M. & Thomasius, R. (2013). Psychometric validation of a German version of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. Zugriff am 10. 09. 2013 unter http://www.epb.uni-hamburg.de/files/u246/Psychometric_validation.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Whitney, D. R. & Sabers, D. L. (1971). Two generalizations of the item discrimination index to multi-score items. The Journal of Experimental Education, 39, 88 – 92. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Widyanto, L. & Griffiths, M. (2006). ‘Internet addiction’: A critical review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4, 31 – 51. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiers, R. W., Bartholow, B. D., van den Wildenberg, E., Thush, C., Engels, R. C. M. E. & Sher, K. J., et al. (2007). Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: A review and a model. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 86 (2), 263 – 283. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Young, K. S. (1996). Psychology of computer use: Xl. Addictive use of the Internet: A case that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports, 79, 899 – 902. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Young, K. S. (1998a). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Young, K. S. (1998b). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 237 – 244. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar