Sexuelle Aggression und Opfererfahrung unter Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen
Prävalenz und Prädiktoren
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Die internationale Forschungsliteratur belegt, dass unfreiwillige sexuelle Interaktionen unter Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen weit verbreitet sind. Ausgehend von einer kurzen Bestandsaufnahme dieser Literatur stellt der Beitrag zwei eigene Studien zum Verbreitungsgrad und zu Risikofaktoren sexuell aggressiven Täterhandelns und sexueller Viktimisierung vor. Neben der traditionellen Konstellation männlicher Täter und weiblicher Opfer werden sexuelle Aggression von Frauen gegenüber Männern sowie sexuelle Viktimisierung von Männern durch Frauen betrachtet. Bezogen auf Risikofaktoren für Täterhandeln und Vulnerabilitätsfaktoren für Opfererfahrungen liegt der Schwerpunkt auf der Betrachtung biografischer Variablen (z.B. kindliche Missbrauchserfahrungen) sowie aktualgenetischer Faktoren (z.B. mehrdeutige Kommunikation sexueller Absichten), wobei der Verankerung von Risikoelementen sexueller Aggression in „sexuellen Skripts”, d.h. Verhaltensdrehbüchern für freiwillige sexuelle Interaktionen, besondere Bedeutung beigemessen wird. Abschließend werden die Implikationen der Befunde für die Entwicklung von Präventionsmaßnahmen diskutiert.
Abstract. There is growing evidence from the international literature that nonconsensual sexual interactions are widespread among adolescents and young adults. Following a brief review of this literature, two studies are reported that examined the prevalence and predictors of sexual aggression and sexual victimization among young people in Germany. In addition to the traditional focus on male perpetrators and female victims, evidence is presented on women’s sexual aggression towards men and men’s sexual victimization by women. Variables increasing the risk of sexual aggression and vulnerability for victimization include both biographical factors (e.g., childhood abuse) and situational variables (e.g., ambiguous communication of sexual intentions). Special consideration is given to the representation of risk factors in the ”sexual scripts” for consensual sexual interactions that serve as guidelines for sexual behavior. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the implications of the findings for prevention efforts.
Literatur
2004). A longitudinal examination of male college students’ perpetration of sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 747–756.
(2004). Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: What do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 271–303.
(2002). Date violence and date rape among adolescents: Associations with disordered eating behaviors and psychological health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26, 455–473.
(1998). Sexually aggressive women. New York: Guilford Press.
. (2006). The association between self-reported lifetime history of forced sexual intercourse and recent health-risk behaviors: Findings from the 2003 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, e1–e7.
(2008). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2007. Zugriff am (14.05.2009). Verfügbar unter www.bka.de/pks/pks2007/index2.html.
(2005). Sexual revictimization: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 6, 103–129.
(2002). Risk of sexual victimization in college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 165–183.
(1997). Childhood sexual abuse, adolescent sexual behavior and sexual revictimization. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21, 789–803.
(1985). The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: A conceptualization. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 55, 530–541.
(2008). Rape against women: What can research offer to guide the development of prevention programs and risk reduction interventions? Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 163–177.
(2005). Assessing the effects of the dating violence prevention program „Safe Dates” using random coefficient regression modeling. Prevention Science, 6, 245–257.
(2007). Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: A multilevel, multinational study of university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 403–422.
(2005). Psychosocial correlates of U.S. adolescents who report a history of forced sexual intercourse. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 372–379.
(2006). A critique of the female sexual perpetrator research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 12–26.
(2007). Epidemiology and consequences of women’s revictimization. Women’s Health Issues, 17,101-106.
(2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 357–370.
(1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.
(2000). Sexual scripts and heterosexual aggression. In , The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 273-292). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
(2003). Aggression von Männern und Frauen in Partnerschaften: Unterschiede und Parallelen. In , Geschlecht – Gewalt – Gesellschaft (pp. 369–383). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
(2004). Sexuelle Skripts im Jugendalter. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 35, 241–260.
(2007). The role of sexual scripts in sexual aggression and victimization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 687–701.
(1999). Measuring sexual aggression: The reliability of the Sexual Experiences Survey in a German sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 91–100.
(2002). Sexuelle Aggression. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2001). Risk factors of sexual aggression and victimization among homosexual men. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1385–1408.
(2000). The prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among homosexual men. The Journal of Sex Research, 37, 142–150.
(2000). A statewide survey of age at first intercourse for adolescent females and age of their male partners: Relation to other risk behaviors and statutory rape implications. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 203–215.
(2006). A prospective analysis of the relationship between childhood sexual victimization and perpetration of dating violence and sexual assault in adulthood. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 732–749.
(1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach. In , Communication Yearbook 19 (pp. 49–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2001). Evaluating a prevention program for teenagers on sexual coercion: A differential effectiveness approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 552–559.
(2009). Sexual coercion in men and women: Similar behaviors, different predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38. Advance online publication. Retrieved May 14, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9481-y.
(1995). Women’s „token resistant” and compliant sexual behaviors are related to uncertain sexual intentions and rape. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 226–236.
(1994). Token resistance to sexual intercourse and consent to unwanted sexual intercourse: College students’ dating experiences in three countries. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 125–132.
(2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude. Oxford: Hart.
(2009). Patterns of sexual coercion in heterosexual and nonheterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38. Advance online publication. Retrieved May 14, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9480-z.
(2007). The use and acceptance of sexually aggressive tactics in college men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 829–850.
(2004). Sexual assault perpetration and reperpetration: From adolescence to young adulthood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 182–202.
(2008). Female perpetration of violence in heterosexual intimate relationships. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 9, 227–249.
(2006). Preventing violence in relationships: Psychological science addressing complex social issues. Canadian Psychology, 47, 44–50.
(2001). Development and validation of the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13, 277–293.
(