Skip to main content
Übersicht

Freundschaftsqualitäten und unterschiedliche Formen aggressiven Verhaltens bei Jungen und Mädchen im späten Kindes- und Jugendalter

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0942-5403/a000248

Zusammenfassung. Kinder und Jugendliche mit aggressiven Verhaltensweisen zeigen gehäuft Probleme in der sozialen Interaktion. Das Eingehen und Aufrechterhalten von Freundschaften gilt im Jugendalter als Entwicklungsaufgabe, deren Gelingen oder Misslingen sich auf die psychosoziale Anpassung auswirken kann. Bezüglich Freundschaftsqualitäten und aggressiven Verhaltensweisen weist die Literatur jedoch heterogene Befunde auf. Die vorliegende Übersichtsarbeit stellt Zusammenhänge zwischen Freundschaftsqualitäten und unterschiedlichen Kategorien aggressiven Verhaltens dar, die diese Unterschiede erklären können. Dabei wird deutlich, dass offen, relational, reaktiv und proaktiv aggressives Handeln mit vermehrt konfliktreichen Freundschaften im Zusammenhang steht. Ein Teil der Studien weist zusätzlich auf intime und unterstützende Freundschaften im Zusammenhang mit relationaler und proaktiver Aggression hin. Die Ergebnisse werden hinsichtlich ihrer Relevanz für die Forschung und den klinischen Alltag diskutiert.


Friendship Quality and Different Forms of Aggressive Behavior in Males and Females in Late Childhood and Adolescence

Abstract. Children and adolescents with aggressive behavior show deficits in social interactions. Especially in late childhood and adolescence, the influence of peer relationships on development becomes increasingly important. Maintaining and building friendships are developmental tasks, and their success or failure can impact later psychosocial well-being. Not only popularity within the peer group, but also the quality of dyadic friendships is an important factor when considering peer relationships and aggressive behavior. The literature differentiates between positive friendship qualities indicating intimate, close, and supportive friendships, and negative friendship qualities referring to conflict, exclusion, and dominance within a friendship. However, the association between positive and negative friendship qualities and aggressive behavior is heterogeneous as discussed in the literature. Therefore, this review aims to give a systematic overview of the relation between friendship quality and aggressive behavior considering distinct forms (overt vs. relational) and functions (reactive vs. proactive) of aggression. Further, owing to differences in both friendship qualities as well as overt and relational aggression in males and females, possible gender differences in the association between friendship quality and aggression were considered. From a systematic literature search in the electronic databases PsychInfo, Web of Knowledge, and PubMed, 14 articles were selected meeting the search requirements. The results showed different patterns for overt and reactive in contrast to relational and proactive aggression emerging: overt and reactive aggressive adolescents perceive their dyadic friendships as high in negative and low in positive friendship qualities. By contrast, although not consistently found in all articles, children and adolescents with relational and proactive aggression see their friendships as high in both positive and negative friendship qualities. Thus, results suggest that relational aggression may be used to build close friendships. Concurrently, conflict as a negative quality coexists with positive friendship quality and was positively related to the stability of relational aggression. However, it was found to be associated with relational aggression depending on popularity within the peer group. In line with previous literature reports, gender differences emerged with respect to friendship quality and forms of aggression independently, but not in their association with each other. Overall, despite the finding that aggressive children and adolescents do not per se maintain friendships consisting only of negative qualities, conflict seems to be present in all patterns of aggression. The types of assessment of aggression (self vs. peer report) and reciprocity of friendships as well as popularity within the peer group should be considered when interpreting results. Findings are discussed with respect to clinical research and practice.

Literatur

  • Archer, J. & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212 – 230. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bagwell, C. L. & Coie, J. D. (2004). The best friendships of aggressive boys: relationship quality, conflict management, and rule-breaking behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 5 – 24. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, J. R. & Hudson, J. L. (2013). Friendship quality predicts treatment outcome in children with anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 31 – 36. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Banny, A. M., Heilbron, N., Ames, A. & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Relational benefits of relational aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive associations with adolescent friendship quality. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1153 – 1166. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: It’s causes, consequences, and control. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7 – 10. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buhrmester, D. & Furman, W. (2008). The Network of Relationship Inventory: Relationship Quality Version. Unpublished measure, University of Texas, Dallas. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Card, N. A. & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466 – 480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M. & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185 – 1229. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ciairano, S., Rabaglietti, E. & Roggero, A. (2007). Patterns of adolescent friendships, psychological adjustment and antisocial behavior: the moderating role of family stress and friendship reciprocity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 539 – 548. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., Ijzendoorn, H. W. van & Lieshout, C. F. M. van (1992). Heterogeneity among peer-rejected boys: Subtypes and stability. Child Development, 4, 893 – 905. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cillessen, A., Jiang, X. L., West, T. & Laszkowski, D. (2005). Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 165 – 172. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coie, J. D. & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. DamonN. EisenbergEds., Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 779 – 862). New York. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crapanzano, A. M., Frick, P. J. & Terranova, A. M. (2009). Patterns of Physical and Relational Aggression in a School-Based Sample of Boys and Girls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 433 – 445. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317 – 2327. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deater-Deckard, K. (2001). Annotation: recent research examining the role of peer relationships in the development of psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 565 – 579. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deptula, D. P. & Cohen, R. (2004). Aggressive, rejected, and delinquent children and adolescents: a comparison of their friendships. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 75 – 104. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W. & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Development, 66, 139 – 151. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dodge, K. A. & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146 – 1158. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Espelage, D. L. (2014). Ecological theory: preventing youth bullying, aggression, and victimization. Theory Into Practice, 53, 257 – 264. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ettekal, I. & Ladd, G. W. (2015). Costs and benefits of children’s physical and relational aggression trajectories on peer rejection, acceptance, and friendships: variations by aggression subtypes, gender, and age. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1756 – 1770. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fanti, K. A., Brookmeyer, K. A. & Henrich, C. C. (2009). Aggressive behavior and quality of friendships linear and curvilinear associations. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 826 – 838. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gasser, L. & Malti, T. (2011). Relationale und physische Aggression in der mittleren Kindheit. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 43, 29 – 38. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Glick, G. C. & Rose, A. J. (2011). Prospective associations between friendship adjustment and social strategies: Friendship as a context for building social skills. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1117 – 1132. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grotpeter, J. K. & Crick, N. R. (1996). Relational aggression, overt aggression, and friendship. Child Development, 67, 2328 – 2338. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D. & Card, N. A. (2007). The allure of a mean friend: relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 170 – 180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heilbron, N. & Prinstein, M. J. (2008). A review and reconceptualization of social aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive correlates. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11, 176 – 217. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kamper, K. E. & Ostrov, J. M. (2013). Relational aggression in middle childhood predicting adolescent social-psychological adjustment: the role of friendship quality. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42, 855 – 862. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kawabata, Y., Crick, N. R. & Hamaguchi, Y. (2010). Forms of aggression, social-psychological adjustment, and peer victimization in a Japanese sample: The moderating role of positive and negative friendship quality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 471 – 484. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kawabata, Y., Tseng, W.-L. & Crick, N. R. (2014). Adaptive, maladaptive, mediational, and bidirectional processes of relational and physical aggression, relational and physical victimization, and peer liking. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 273 – 287. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kokkinos, C. M., Voulgaridou, I. & Markos, A. (2016). Personality and relational aggression: moral disengagement and friendship quality as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 74 – 79. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kouwenberg, M., Rieffe, C. & Banerjee, R. (2013). Developmetrics of a balanced and short Best Friend Index for children and young adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 634 – 641. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laursen, B. & Mooney, K. S. (2008). Relationship network quality: Adolescent adjustment and perceptions of relationships with parents and friends. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78, 47 – 53. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T., Henrich, C. & Jones, S. (2003). Disentangling the „whys“ from the „whats“ of aggressive behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 122 – 133. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malti, T., McDonald, K., Rubin, K. H., Rose-Krasnor, L. & Booth-LaForce, C. (2015). Developmental trajectories of peer-reported aggressive behavior: the role of friendship understanding, friendship quality, and friends’ aggressive behavior. Psychology of Violence, 5, 402 – 410. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oswald, H. (2009). Anerkennung durch Gleichaltrige in Kindheit und Jugend. Soziale Passagen, 1, 177 – 191. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petermann, F.Petermann, U. (2015). Aggressionsdiagnostik (2., veränd. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Poulin, F. & Boivin, M. (1999). Proactive and reactive aggression and boys’ friendship quality in mainstream classrooms. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 168 – 177. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prinstein, M. J. & Wang, S. S. (2005). False consensus and adolescent peer contagion: Examining discrepancies between perceptions and actual reported levels of friends’ deviant and health risk behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 293 – 306. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P. & Carlson, W. (2004). Friendships of aggressive youth: Considering the influences of being disliked and of being perceived as popular. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 25 – 45. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudolph, K. D. & Rose, A. J. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98 – 131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A. & Lagerspetz, K. (2000). Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 17 – 24. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sijtsema, J. J., Ojanen, T. & Veenstra, R. (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development, 9, 515 – 534. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Duriez, B. & Niemiec, C. P. (2008). The intervening role of relational aggression between psychological control and friendship quality. Social Development, 17, 661 – 681. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stadler, C. (2011). Störungen des Sozialverhaltens. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 40, 7 – 19. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Voulgaridou, I. & Kokkinos, C. M. (2015). Relational aggression in adolescents: A review of theoretical and empirical research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 87 – 97. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Waldrip, A. M. & Malcolm, K. T. (2008). With a little help from your friends: The importance of high-quality friendships on early adolescent adjustment. Social Development, 17, 832 – 852. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar