Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443.36.4.251

Zusammenfassung.Theoretischer Hintergrund: Die Wirksamkeit von Paartherapien und präventiven Interventionsprogrammen für Paare gilt als gut dokumentiert. Das Wissen wie diese Veränderungen zustande kommen ist jedoch defizitär. Aus diesem Grund wurde gefordert, neben dem Therapieoutcome auch die Wirkungsweise der Interventionen zu erforschen. Fragestellung: Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist es zu untersuchen, wie Paare auf eine bewältigungsorientierte paartherapeutische Intervention, die 3-Phasen-Methode von Bodenmann (2004), emotional und physiologisch reagieren. Methode: Während eines therapeutisch angeleiteten Gesprächs über ein paarexternes Stressereignis wurden bei den Paaren (N = 18) die Herzrate und das emotionale Befinden erfasst. Ergebnisse: Frauen wiesen gegenüber Männern stärkere emotionale und kardiovaskuläre Reaktionen auf und reagierten empathischer. Die Erfahrung von Unterstützung durch den Partner (dyadisches Coping) war mit einer emotionalen und physiologischen Entlastung assoziiert. Schlussfolgerung: Die Resultate unterstreichen unter anderem die Wichtigkeit des dyadischen Copings für emotionale und physiologische Prozesse während Paarinterventionen.


Emotional and cardiovascular reactions of couples during a couple-therapeutic intervention: a pilot study

Abstract.Background: The efficacy of marital therapy and distress prevention training for couples is regarded as being well documented. However, only little is known about the mechanisms of change and how couples experience these interventions. Objective: We explored the emotional and physiological reactions of couples in the context of the 3-phases-method of Bodenmann (2004), which trains emotion-centered communication skills and exchange of dyadic coping in couples. Methods: During a conversation about a relationship external stressor, emotions and heart rate were measured. Results: Results reveal higher emotional and physiological reactions and more empathetic in reactions in women than in to men. Furthermore the results show that dyadic coping is associated with emotional and physiological discharge. Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of dyadic coping for physiological and emotional processes during couple interventions.

Literatur

  • Basow, S. A., Rubenfeld, K. (2003). “Troubles Talk“: Effects of gender and gender-typing. Sex Roles , 48, 183–187. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (1995). Bewältigung von Stress in Partnerschaften. Der Einfluss von Belastungen auf die Qualität und Stabilität von Paarbeziehungen. Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2004). Verhaltenstherapie mit Paaren. Ein modernes Handbuch für die psychologische Beratung und Behandlung. Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping, marital quality and well-being: A two year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology , 20, 485–493. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G., Shantinath, S. D. (2004). The Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Family Relations , 53(5),477–484. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burman, B., Margolin, G. (1992). Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: An interactional perspective. Psychological Bulletin , 112, 39–63. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christenfeld, N., Gerin, W., Linden, W., Sanders, M., Mathur, J., Deich, J., Pickering, T. G. (1997). Social support effects on cardiovascular reactivity: Is a stranger as effective as a friend?. Psychosomatic Medicine , 59, 388–398. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, A., Baucom, D., Vu, C., Stanton, S. (2005). Methodologically sound, cost-effective research on the outcome of couple therapy. Journal of Family Psychology , 19(1),6–17. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, A., Heavey, C. L. (1999). Interventions for couples. In J. T. Spence, J. M. Darley & D. J. Foss (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 165-190). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, R. L., Schwebel, A. I. (1995). Meta-analytic review of marital therapy outcome research. Journal of Family Psychology , 9, 58–68. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Epstein, E. M., Sloan, D. M., Marx, B. P. (2005). Getting to the heart of the matter: Written disclosure, gender, and heart rate. Psychosomatic Medicine , 67, 413–419. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fontana, A. M., Diegnan, T., Villeneuve, A., Lepore, S. (1999). Nonevaluative social support reduces cardiovascular reactivity in young women during acutely stressful performance situations. Journal for Behavioral Medicine , 22(1),75–91. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fritz, H., Nagurney, A. J., Helgeson, V. S. (2003). Social interactions and cardiovascular reactivity during problem disclosure among friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 29(6),713–725. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gerin, W., Pieper, C., Levy, R., Pickering, T. G. (1992). Social support in Social interaction: A moderator of cardiovascular reactivity. Psychosomatic Medicine , 54, 183–194. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glynn, L. M., Christenfeld, N., Gerin, W. (1999). Gender, Social Support, and Cardiovascular Response to Stress. Psychosomatic Medicine , 61, 234–242. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Groth, T. (1999). Partnerschaft als Belastungsfaktor: Psychophysiologische Reaktivität in akuten partnerschaftlichen Konfliktgesprächen. Hamburg: Kovac. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Groth, T., Fehm-Wolfsdorf, G., Hahlweg, K. (2000). In E. H. Witte & Ch. Bleich (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie des Stresses und der sozialen Unterstützung (S. 33-55). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hahlweg, K. (1996). Fragebogen zur Partnerschaftsdiagnostik: Partnerschaftsfragbogen PFB, Problemliste PL und Fragebogen zur Lebensgeschichte und Partnerschaft FLP. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hahlweg, K., Markman, H. J., Thurmaier, F., Engl, J., Eckert, V. (1998). Prevention of marital distress: Results of a German prospective longitudinal study. Journal-of-Family-Psychology , 12(4),543–556. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Halford, W. K., Sanders, M. R., Beherens, B. C. (1993). Can skills training prevent relationship problems in at-risk couples? Four-year effects of a behavioural relationship education program. Journal of Family Psychology , 15, 750–768. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heathrington, L., Friedlander, M., Greenberg, L. (2005). Change process research in couple and family therapy: Methodological challenges and opportunities. Journal of Family Psychology , 19(1),18–27. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Iverson, A., Baucom, D. H. (1990). Behavioral marital therapy outcomes: Alternate interpretations of the data. Behavior Therapy , 21, 129–138. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Janke, W., Hüppe, M., Kallus, W., Schmidt-Atzert, L. (1988). Befindlichkeitsskalierung anhand von Kategorien und Eigenschaftswörtern. BSKE, BSKE-EA, BSKE-EAK. Würzburg: Institut für Psychologie. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin , 118, 3–34. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Loving, T. J., Stowell, J. R., Malarkey, W. B., Lemeshow, S., Dickinson, S. L., Glaser, R. (2005). Hostile marital interactions, proinflammatory cytokine production, and wound healing. Arch Gen Psychiatry , 62, 1377–1384. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kudielka, B. M., Buske-Kirschbaum, A., Hellhammer, D. H., Kirschbaum, C. (2004). Differential heart rate reactivity and recovery after psychosocial stress (TSST) in health children, younger adults, and elderly adults: The impact of age and gender. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine , 11(2),116–121. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lafferty, J. (2004). The relationship between gender, empathy, and aggressive behaviours among early adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International , 64, 63–77. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lyons, A. C., Farquahr, C. (2002). Past disclosure and conversation experience. Effects on cardiovascular functioning while women talk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 32(10),2043–2066. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Neff, L. A., Karney, B. R. (2005). Gender differences in social support: A question of skill or responsiveness?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 88(1),79–90. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robles, T. F., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2003). The physiology of marriage: pathways to health. Physiology and Behavior , 79, 409–416. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schilling, E. A., Baucom, D., Burnett, Ch., Allen, E. S., Ragland, L. (2003). Altering the course of marriage: The effect of PREP communication skills acquisition on couples risk of becoming maritally distressed. Journal of Family Psychology , 17(1),41–53. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shadish, W. R., Baldwin, S. A. (2005). Effects of behavioral marital therapy: A Meta-analysis of randomized controlles trials. Journal-of-Consulting-and-Clinical-Psychology , 73(1),6–14. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin , 87, 245–251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stemmler, G. (2004). Physiological process during emotion. In P. Philippot & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), The regulation of emotion (pp. 33-70). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stroud, L. R., Salovey, P., Epel, E. S. (2002). Sex Differences in stress responses: Social rejection versus achievement stress. Biological Psychiatry , 52, 318–327. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Westermann, R. (2000). Wissenschaftstheorie und Experimentalmethodik. Ein Lehrbuch zur Psychologischen Methodenlehre. Göttingen: Hoegrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar