Toward Measuring Adolescent Environmental Perception
Abstract
This study presents a scale developed to measure two dimensions of environmental perceptions—reactions towards preservation and towards utilizing nature and/or the environment—consisting of two and three subscales, respectively. The empirical part consists of a reanalysis of data from four national samples, now analyzed together as one sample. The results of the four subsamples (of some 4,500 secondary school pupils in total) have been published elsewhere as bilateral studies. The aim of the present analysis is to identify a scale that is valid for the entire European sample: By means of factor analyses and structural equation modeling 20 items were extracted. Two latent variables, “Utilization” and “Preservation,” were hypothesized and related in a causal fashion, whereby “Utilization” influences “Preservation.” By application of the methods of linear structural relationships, the proposed model yields a good fit to the data.
References
References
Arbuckle, J.L. (1997). Amos user's guide, version 3.6. . Chicago: Small Waters Corp.Arcury, T.A. Johnson, T.P. Scollay, S.J. (1986). Ecological world view and environmental knowledge: The “new environmental paradigm.”. Journal of Environmental Education, 17, 35– 40Axelrod, L.J. Lehman, D.R. (1993). Responding to environmental concerns.. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 149– 159Blaikie, W.H. (1992). The nature and origins of ecological world views: An Australian study.. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 144– 165Bogner, F.X. (1998a). Environmental perception of Irish and Bavarian school pupils. an empirical study within two European regions.. The Environmentalist, 18, 27– 38Bogner, F.X. (1998b). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspectives?. Journal of Environmental Education, 29, 17– 29Bogner, F.X. Wilhelm, M.G. (1996). Environmental perception of pupils. Development of an attitude and behaviour scale.. The Environmentalist, 16, 95– 110Bogner, F. X. Wiseman, M. (1996). Environmental perception of Danish and Bavarian pupils. Towards a methodological framework.. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 41, 53– 71Bogner, F. X. Wiseman, M. (1997). Environmental perception of rural and urban pupils.. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 111– 122Bogner, F. X. Wiseman, M. (1998). Environmental perception of Swiss and Bavarian pupils.. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 24, 547– 566Bogner, F.X. Brengelmann, J. Wiseman, M. (1999). Risk-taking and environmental perception.. The Environmentalist, in pressCatton, W.R. Dunlap, R.E. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm.. American Sociologist, 13, 41– 49Cotgrove, S. Duff, A. (1981). Environmentalism, values and social change.. British Journal of Sociology, 32, 92– 110Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.. Psychometrika, 16, 297– 334Disinger, J.F. Tomsen, J.L. (1995). Environmental education research news.. Environmentalist, 15, 3– 9Dunlap, R.E. (1980). Paradigmatic change in social science: From human exemptions to an ecological paradigm.. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 5– 14Dunlap, R. Hefernan, R. (1975). Outdoor recreation and environmental concern: An empirical examination.. Rural Sociology, 40, 18– 30Dunlap, R. Van Liere, K.D. (1978). The “New Environmental Paradigm.”. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10– 19Dunlap, R. Van Liere, K.D. (1984). Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality.. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 1013– 1028Geller, J.M. Lasley, P. (1985). The new environmental paradigm scale: A re-examination.. Journal of Environmental Education, 17, 9– 12German Governmental Expert Report. (1978). Ministry of Environmental Affairs, Bonn.
Grob, A. (1995). A structural model of environmental attitudes and behavior.. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 209– 220Hackett, P.M. (1992). The understanding of environmental concern.. Social Behavior and Personality, 20, 143– 148Hays, S.P. (1987). Beauty, health and permanence: Environmental politics in the United States 1955-1985. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Hines, J.M. Hungerford, H.R. Tomera, A.N. (1987). Analysis of synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis.. Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1– 8Jöreskog, K.G. (1973). A general model for estimating a linear structural equation system.. In A.S. Goldberger & O.D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85-112). New York: Seminar Press.Jöreskog, K.G. Sörborn, D. (1986). LISREL VI user's guide. . Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.Leeming, F.C. Dwyer, W.O. Porter, B.E. Cobern, M.K. (1993). Outcome research in environmental education.. Journal of Environmental Education, 24, 8– 21Leeming, C.L. Dwyer, W.O. Bracken, B.A. (1995). Children's environmental attitude and knowledge scale: Construction and validation.. Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 22– 31Levy-Leboyer, C. Bonnes, M. Ferreira-Marques, J. Pawlik, K. (1996). Determinants of pro-environmental behaviors: A five-country comparison.. European Psychologist, 1, 123– 129Long, J.S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis: A preface to LISREL. . Beverly Hills: Sage.Maloney, M. Ward, M. (1973). Ecology: Let's hear from the people.. American Psychologist, 28, 583– 586Milbrath, L.W. (1981). General report: U. S. component of a comparative study of environmental beliefs and values. . Buffalo: Environmental Studies Center.Milbrath, L.W. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguard for a new society. . Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Norusis, M.J. (1993a). SPSS for Windows: Base system user's guide. . Chicago: SPSS Inc.Norusis, M.J. (1993b). SPSS for Windows: Professional statistics. . Chicago: SPSS Inc.Oliver, R.I. Bearden, W.O. (1985). Crossover effects in the theory of reasoned action: A moderating influence attempt.. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 324– 340Tittle, C.R. Hill, R.J. (1967). The accuracy of self-reported data and prediction of political activity.. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 103– 106Ray, J.J. (1980). The psychology of environmental concern—Some Australian data.. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 161– 163Schahn, J. Holzer, E. (1990). Studies of environmental concern: The role of knowledge, gender and background variables.. Environment & Behavior, 22, 267– 286Stern, P.C. Dietz, T. Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientation, gender and environmental concern.. Environment & Behavior, 25, 322– 348Stern, P.C. Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern.. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65– 84Stern, P.C. Dietz, T. Kalof, L. Guagnano, G.A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitudes objects.. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1611– 1636Szagun, G. Mesenholl, E. (1993). Environmental ethics: An empirical study of West German adolescents.. Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 37– 44Van Liere, K.D. Dunlap, R.E. (1980). The social basis of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence.. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181– 197Van Liere, K.D. Dunlap, R.E. (1981). Environmental concern. Does it make a difference how it's measured?. Environment & Behavior, 13, 651– 676
