Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection: The Legal Framework and Test Bias
Abstract
By the early 1990s, public concern in Europe over discrimination against women and minority groups had grown manifestly. This confronted psychologists with the problem of the disproportionate representation of various subgroups in certain kinds of jobs. In this article we first deal with the major upheaval in the legal issues that presently shape the selection practices in Europe and the United States. We then turn our attention to the problem of indirect discrimination and the discussion on the validity of some of the most representative assessment devices used in selection. Although there has not been a systematic application of work-sample tests in Europe over the past decades, some organizations have turned to the behavioral-consistency model in an attempt to avoid the problems of job-relatedness and adverse impact of the traditional assessment procedures.
References
(1998). Tests psicol¢gicos [Psychological tests] (7th. ed.).. Mexico: Prentice Hall..
(1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research.. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281– 322.
(1974). Realistic work sample tests: A review.. Personnel Psychology, 27, 519– 533.
(1992). Intelligence. . New York: Academic Press..
(1979). Performance testing: A rose among thorns?. Personnel Psychology, 32, 751– 766.
(1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and white students in integrated colleges.. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 115– 124.
(1988). Barriers to fair selection. . London: HMSO..
(1996). Informe Anual de la Comisi¢n: Igualdad de oportunidades entre mujeres and hombres en la Uni¢n Europea [Annual report of the commission: Equal opportunities between women and men at the European Union].. Brussels: COM(96) 650 final..
(August 1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. . Federal Register 43 (166): 38290-38315..
(1995). Personalidad y diferencias individuales en el trabajo [Personality and individual differences at work].. Madrid: Pirámide..
(1966). The validity of occupational aptitude tests. . New York: Wiley..
(1973). The validity of aptitude tests in personnel selection.. Personnel Psychology, 26, 461– 477.
(1976). The prediction of trainability using a work sample test and an aptitude test: A direct comparison.. Personnel Psychology, 29, 243– 253.
(1976). Recruiting, selection and job replacement.. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally..
(1983). Moderating effects of decision-making/information-processing job dimensions on test validities.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 602– 608.
(1973). Statistical definitions of test validity for minority groups.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 1– 4.
(1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72– 98.
(1996). Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications.. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 2, 447– 472.
(1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage..
(1998). Dise¤o de pruebas de certificaci¢n [Professional certification tests]. . Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Empleo..
(2000). International guidelines for test-use (version 2000). . Document retrieved from the Web: cwis.kub.nl/fsw_1/itc/..
(1956). The dynamics of interviewing. . New York: Wiley..
(1992). Evaluaci¢n del personal [Personnel assessment].. Madrid: D¡az de Santos..
(1999). Los avances de la psicometr¡a y la construcci¢n de tests [Developments in the field of psychometrics and test construction].. In F. Silva (Ed.), Avances en evaluaci¢n psicol¢gica [Developments in psychological assessment] (pp. 1- 74). Valencia: Promolibro..
(1974). The psychology of sex differences. . Stanford: Stanford University Press..
(1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence.. American Psychologist, 1, 1– 14.
(1992). Industrial and organizational psychology. . London: Routledge..
(1978). Employee selection within the law. . Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs..
(2000). Web document, www.dol.gov/dol/esa/public ... compliance/ofccp/how2/ofcpchl.html.
(1987). Selection tests and sex bias. . London: HMSO..
(1988). Procesos de selecci¢n y discriminaci¢n en el empleo [Selection processes and discrimination at employment].. In Colegio Oficial de Psic¢logos, Primer Congreso Iberoamericano y Tercero Nacional de Psicolog¡a del Trabajo y las Organizaciones [1st Iberoamerican & 3rd National Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology]. Madrid: Colegio Oficial de Psic¢logos..
(1992). Intelligence is the best predictor of job performance.. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 86– 89.
(1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures.. Personnel Psychology, 35(1), 1– 62.
(1982). Work sample tests: Validity, adverse impact and application reaction.. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 171– 183.
(1995). Las discriminaciones directas e indirectas en trabajo [Intentional and unintentional discriminations at work].. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 6, 67– 80.
(1993). Personnel psychology at the cutting edge.. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection (pp.497- 515). San Francisco: Jossey Bass..
(1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529– 540.
(1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in Personnel Psychology. Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262– 274.
(1981). Task differences as moderators of aptitude test validity in selection: A red herring.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 166– 185.
(1986). On shifting standards for conclusions regarding validity generalization.. Personnel Psychology, 39, 849– 851.
(1971). Concepts of culture fairness.. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 63– 70.
(1971). Griggs vs. Duke Power Company . United States Reports, 401, 424(a)–.
(1975). Albermale Paper Company vs. Moody . United States Reports, 422, 405–.
(1976). Washington vs. Davis . United States Reports, 96, 2040(c)–.
(1978). University of California Regents vs. Bakke . United States Supreme Court Reports: Lawyer's Edition, 57, 750– 853.
(1991). The gender relations of assessment.. In J. Firth-Cozens & M. West (Eds.), Women at work (pp.13-25). Buckingham: Open University Press..
(1968). Signs, samples and criteria.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372– 376.
