Psychosocial Profile of Rural and Urban Elders in Portugal
Abstract
In the scope of the ecology-of-aging paradigm, we studied two different groups of independent elderly living in rural versus urban Portuguese settings. The main objectives were: (1) to develop knowledge on aging in different contexts; (2) to analyze the differences in autonomous behavior, social relationships, psychological satisfaction (e.g., morale), and self-perception of general health and quality of life between rural and urban residents; (3) to contribute to the design of policies for the elderly. We did 1.5h home interviews of 234 elderly (117 rural and 117 urban) to collect socio-demographic data, and access the capacity to perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADL Scale) and life satisfaction (Philadelphia Morale Scale). Although all the subjects were to some extent deprived, results show that the two communities are different in some socio-demographic characteristics such as education level and financial situation (favoring urban elderly), and in their level of autonomy (higher in rural elderly); they also differ in their social network (larger for rural elderly), feeling of anxiety (lower in rural elderly), and attitudes toward their own aging (more positive in rural elderly). Both communities have a similar feeling of loneliness and a somewhat negative perception of health and quality of life. All the elderly consider aging-in-place as very important and require more community-based services.
References
(1990). Successful ageing. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .
(1996). Revisiting the rural-urban contrast: Personal networks in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan settings.. Rural Sociology, 61, 306– 305.
(1997). The relationship of social environment, social networks and health outcomes in the Seattle Longitudinal Study: Two analytical approaches.. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, P197– P205.
(1998). Economic status, work, and retirement among the rural elderly.. In R. Coward & J. Krout (Eds), Aging in rural settings. Life circumstances and distinctive features (pp.47-66). New York: Springer. .
(2002, April ). Retirement transition and adjustment in a Portuguese sample. . Poster presented at the Valencia Forum, Valencia, Spain. .
(2000). Rural/urban patterns of aging and caregiving in the United States.. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 611– 632.
(2000). As gerações mais idosas ‘Elders' generation’.. Lisboa: DECP/Serviço de estudos sobre a população. .
(2002). O envelhecimento em Portugal ‘Aging in Portugal’.. Lisboa: DECP/Serviço de estudos sobre a população. .
(1982). A congruence model of person-environment interaction.. In M.P. Lawton, P.G. Windley, & T.O. Byerts (Eds.), Aging and the environment: Theoretical approaches (pp.97-121). New York: Springer. .
(1997). Anticipated support, received support, and economic stress among older adults.. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, P59– P73.
(2001). Social Support.. In R. Binstock & L. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (5th ed., pp.272- 294). San Diego: Academic Press. .
(1998). Aging in rural environments.. In R. Coward & J. Krout (Eds.), Aging in rural settings. Life circumstances and distinctive features (pp.3-14). New York: Springer. .
(1975). The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: A revision.. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85– 89.
(1989). Environment proactivity and affect in older people.. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Social psychology of aging (pp.135-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. .
(1998). Environment and aging: Theory revisited.. In R.J. Sheidt & P.G. Windley (Eds.), Environment and aging theory: A focus on housing (pp.1-31). Westport: Greenwood. .
(1969). Assessment of older people; self maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.. Gerontologist, 9, 179– 186.
(1973). Ecology and the aging process.. In C. Eisdorfer & M.P. Lawton (Eds.), Psychology of adult development and aging (pp.619-674). Washington: American Psychological Association. .
(1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. . New York: McGraw-Hill. .
(1988). Lubben social network scale.. Family and Community Health, Nov., 44– 53.
(1998). The rural elderly: A demographic portrait.. In R. Coward & J. Krout (Eds.), Aging in rural settings. Life circumstances and distinctive features (pp.15-43). New York: Springer-Verlag. .
(1992). Satisfação de Vida em Idosos ‘Life satisfaction in the elderly’.. Psychologica, 8, 61– 80.
(1997). Successful aging. . New York: DTP Health. .
(1992). Attachment to place and representation of life course by the elderly.. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Human behavior and environment, Vol.12: Place attachment (pp.139-163). New York: Plenum. .
(1982). Responses of the elder to the environment: A stress-theoretical perspective.. In M.P. Lawton, P.G. Windley, & T.O. Byerts (Eds.), Aging and environment: Theoretical approaches (pp.80-96). New York: Springer. .
(1992). Spouses as caregivers.. In J. Dwyer & R. Coward (Eds.), Gender, families and elder care (pp.49-64). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. .
(1998). Rural-urban contrasts in elder health status: Methodologic issues and findings.. In R. Coward & J. Krout (Eds.), Aging in rural settings. Life circumstances and distinctive features (pp.67-83). New York: Springer. .
(2001). Health and ageing. A discussion paper. . Geneva: Department of Health Promotion. .
(2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. . Geneva: WHO/ NPH/02.8. .
