Convergence of Direct, Indirect, and Objective Risk-Taking Measures in Gambling
The Moderating Role of Impulsiveness and Self-Control
Abstract
Based on dual-process models, we assumed that risk taking depends on implicit and explicit risk attitudes and risk propensity. Specifically, we predicted that the convergence between these indicators would depend on the impulsiveness versus reflectiveness of risk behavior. Two objective personality tests (OPTs) of risk taking that measure risk behavior in standardized situations were employed. We predicted that the impulsive OPT would depend more on implicit risk dispositions. The reverse effect pattern was expected for the reflective OPT. Next, we expected that self-control would amplify the weight of explicit dispositions and attenuate that of implicit dispositions. At Time 1, two direct questionnaire measures of explicit risk proneness, three indirect measures of implicit risk proneness, and a self-control measure were administered. At Time 2, participants participated in a reflective and an impulsive gambling OPT. The assumed pattern of effects was obtained. We conclude with a discussion of future research avenues.
References
(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.
(1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.
(2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393.
(submitted). An inkblot for male sexual preference: The sexual misattribution procedure.
(2001). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgement and Decision Making, 1, 33–47.
(2006). Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 192–212.
(2005). Decision-making deficits of Korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: Associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology, 19, 267–277.
(2008). The role of strategies in deciding advantageously in ambiguous and risky situations. Cognitive Processing, 9, 159–173.
(2005). Impulse and constraint: Perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 312–333.
(1967). Objective personality and motivation tests: A theoretical introduction and practical compendium. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
(2004). Implicit attitudes as potential protection from risky sex: Predicting condom use with the IAT. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 227–236.
(2006). Using the Implicit Association Test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 37, 176–187.
(2002). Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441–1455.
(2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.
(1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.
(2008). When and why do implicit measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 285–338.
(2008). When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of implicit and explicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 397–419.
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test I: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
(2008). Convergent and predictive validity of implicit and explicit anxiety measures as a function of specificity similarity and content similarity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 254–262.
(2005). What moderates implicit-explicit consistency?. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 335–390.
(2005). Construct validity of the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART): Associations with psychopathy and impulsivity. Assessment, 12, 416–428.
(2004). A domain-specific scale measuring risk perceptions, expected benefits, and perceived-risk attitude in German-speaking populations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 153–163.
(2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32.
(1964). Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
(2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 75–84.
(2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293.
(2006). Gender differences in explicit and implicit risk attitudes: A socially facilitated phenomenon. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 397–419.
(2008). Through a glass, less darkly? Reassessing convergent and discriminant validity in measures of implicit self-esteem. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 273–281.
(in preparation). Fragebogen zu selbststeuernden Kompetenzen (FSSTK) .
Questionnaire of self-regulative competencies University of Bonn.(2009). Person × situation – interactions as moderators. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 267.
(2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131.
(2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324.
(2009). Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 94, 116–124.
(1991). Psychobiology of personality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
