Skip to main content
Original Article

How to Perform Idiographic and a Combination of Idiographic and Nomothetic Approaches

A Comparison of Time Series Analyses and Hierarchical Linear Modeling

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409/a000026

The aim of the study is to combine and compare person-oriented and nomothetic approaches to analyze longitudinal data with time series analyses and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). Based on the evaluation of an intervention study both approaches were used to compare individual and group data. In this study, a training was implemented to foster students’ self-regulation and selected results were presented at the individual and group level for the variables planning and motivation. To analyze data with time series analysis, cross-correlations and trend analyses were conducted. Cross-correlations revealed similar results on the aggregated and individual level whereas trend analysis indicated different results of these two levels. Results of HLM analyses for longitudinal data suggested that students’ motivation has more influence than the type of training group on students’ planning. The findings demonstrate that individual and group-level results differ and that both methods have different focuses. This means that it is useful to combine time series analyses and HLM approaches when analyzing longitudinal data.

References

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bergman, L. R. , von Eye, A. , Magnusson, D. (2006). Person-oriented research strategies in developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti, D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 850–888). London: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boekaerts, M. , & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199–231. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bretz, H.-J. , Weber, R. , Gmel, G. , & Schmitz, B. (1999). The time of the ‘Wende’: Social change and the reception of political broadcasting in the German Democratic Republic: Time series analyses of news usage. In R. K. Silbereisen, A. von Eye (Eds.), Growing up in times of social change (pp. 203–223). New York, NY: de Gruyter. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bryan, T. , Nelson, C. (1994). Doing homework: Perspectives of elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 488–499. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. (1952). The three basic factor-analytic research designs – Their interrelations and derivatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 499–520. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman, D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Theory, research and practice (pp. 111–141). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Leeuw, J. , Meijer, E. (2008). Introduction to multilevel analysis. In J. de Leeuw, E. Meijer (Eds.), Handbook of multilevel analysis (pp. 1–75). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ditton, H. (1998). Mehrebenenanalyse. Grundlagen und Anwendungen des Hierarchisch Linearen Modells [Multilevel analysis: Basics and applications of the hierarchical linear model]. Weinheim, Germany: Juventa. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gottmann, J. , Roy, A. (1990). Sequential analysis: A guide for behavioral researchers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. , Battiato, A. C. , Walker, J. M. T. , Reed, R. P. , DeJong, J. M. , Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 195–209. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research design. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Korotitsch, W. , & Nelson Gray, R. O. (1999). An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment. Psychological Assessment, 11, 415–425. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kratochwill, T. R. (1992). Single-case research design and analysis: An overview. In T. R. Kratochwill, J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis (pp. 1–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology – This time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201–218. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nesselroade, J. R. (1988). Some implications of the trait-state distinction for the study of development across the life span: The case of personality research. In P. B. Baltes, D. L. Featherman, R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 163–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neuman, S. B. , & McCormick, S. (1995). Single-subject experimental research: Applications for literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41, 116–125. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perels, F. , Gürtler, T. , Schmitz, B. (2005). Training of self-regulatory and problem-solving competence. Learning and Instruction, 15, 123–139. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perels, F. , Miethner, S. , Schmitz, B. (2010). Training program for secondary school students and their parents to improve self-regulated learning. Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pintrich, P. R. , Smith, D. , Garcia, T. , & McKeachie, W. (1991). The motivated strategies for learning questionaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raudenbush, S. W. , Bryk, A. S. , Congdon, R. (2004). HLM 6. SSI Scientific Software International. Hierarchical linear & nonlinear modelling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rogosa, D. R. (1995). Myths about longitudinal research. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, B. (1990). Univariate und multivariate time-series models: The analysis of intraindividual variability and intraindividual relationships. In A. von Eye (Ed.), Statistical methods in longitudinal research (Vol. II, pp. 351–386). Boston, MA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, B. (2000). Auf der Suche nach dem verlorenen Individuum: Vier Theoreme zur Aggregation von Prozessdaten [In search of the lost individual: Four theorems regarding the aggregation of processes]. Psychologische Rundschau, 51, 83–92. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, B. (2006). Advantages of studying processes in educational research. Learning and Instruction, 16, 433–449. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, B. , Klug, J. , & Schmidt, M. (in press). Assessing self-regulated learning using diary measures with university students. In B. Zimmerman, D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, B. , Perels, F. , & Löb, M. (2009). Zeitreihenanalysen. In H. Holling (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Evaluation, Bd. I, Grundlagen und statistische Methoden der Evaluationsforschung [Basics and statistic methods of research on evaluation]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitz, B. , Wiese, B. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 64–96. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skrondal, A. , Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2008). Multilevel and related models for longitudinal data. In J. de Leeuw, E. Meijer (Eds.), Handbook of multilevel analysis (pp. 275–299). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Todman, J. B. , & Dugard, P. (2001). Single-case and small-n experimental designs. A practical guide to randomization tests. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • von Eye, A. (1990). Statistical methods in longitudinal research. Principles and structuring change. St. Louis, MO: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • von Eye, A. , Mun, E. Y. , & Bogat, G. A. (2008). Temporal patterns of variable relationships in person-oriented research: Longitudinal models of configural frequency analysis. Developmental Psychology, 44, 437–445. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yaffee, R. A. , & McGee, M. (2000). Introduction to time series analyses and forecasting. With applications of SAS and SPSS. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B. J. , & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In D. H. Schunk, J. L. Meece (Eds.), Students perception in the classroom (pp. 185–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar