The Role of Clinician Fear in Interviewing Suicidal Patients
Abstract
Abstract. Researchers are increasingly interested in how clinicians should screen for suicide ideation in care settings and the merits of doing so. A common finding is that screening does no harm, and may do good, insofar as once the subject of suicide is broached clinicians can conduct a suicide risk assessment to determine the course of safe care. To date, little has been published about just how clinicians should ask "the ask" about suicidal ideation. The aim of this article is to suggest that the difficulty clinicians seem to have in initiating a verbal probe for suicidal ideation has less to do with patient characteristics than it does with clinician anticipatory anxiety about learning that a patient is positive for suicidal ideation. Face-negotiation theory and politeness theory are offered as possible explanations for why a simple direct question is so difficult to ask. Future research directions are suggested and an absence of data from public health gatekeeper training is offered as argument for clinicians to be more direct in their probes for suicidal ideation.
References
(1890). The art of authorship. New York, NY: D. Appleton & Co.
(2017). How to ask about suicide? A question in need of an empirical answer. Crisis, 38(4), 213–216. 10.1027-5910/a000501
(1978). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2017). On the iatrogenic risk of assessing suicidality: A meta-analysis. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. Advance online publication. 10.1111/sltb.12368
(1967). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York, NY: Random House.
(1975).
Logic and conversation. In P. ColeJ. L. MorganEds., Syntax & semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.(2006). Problems in psychotherapy with suicidal patients. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 67–72. 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.67
(2016). The influence of training and experience on mental health practitioners' comfort working with suicidal individuals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(2), 138. 10.1037/pro0000070
(2015). Does assessing suicidality frequently and repeatedly cause harm? A randomized control study. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1171–1181. 10.1037/pas0000118
(2012). What's the harm in asking about suicidal ideation? Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 42(3), 341–351. 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.0095.x
(2017). How do healthcare professionals interview patients to assess suicide risk? BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 122. 10.1186/s12888-017-1212-7
(2007). The stuff of thought. New York, NY: Viking.
(2015). Our empathic brain and suicidal individuals. Crisis, 36(4), 227–230. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000327
(1995). QPR: Certified QPR gatekeeper instructors training manual. Spokane, WA: The QPR Institute.
(2017). Mental health professionals' suicide risk assessment and management practices. Crisis, 39, 55–64. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000478
(2012). Preventing suicide through improved training in suicide risk assessment and care: An American Association of Suicidology Task Force report addressing serious gaps in US mental health training. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 42, 292–304. 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00090.x
(2013). Suicide risk assessment received prior to suicide death by Veterans Health Administration patients with a history of depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 74(3), 226–232. 10.4088/JCP.12m07853
(2009). How suicidal bipolar patients are depends on how suicidal ideation is defined. Journal of Affective Disorders, 118, 48–54. 10.1016/j.jad.2009.02.008
(2011). Suicide-related discussions with depressed primary care patients in the USA: Gender and quality gaps. A mixed methods analysis. BMJ Open, 2, e000198. 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000198
