Abstract
This study empirically estimated the role played by attitudes toward risk in insurance decision-making. Four hundred forty-five participants underwent the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) coupled with skin conductance recording and demographic/socio-economic questionnaires. The multiple regression model showed a higher probability of holding health insurance for people who are more risk seeking (bad performance at the IGT) but are adaptively able to feel the risk (normal anticipatory skin conductance responses to disadvantageous decks). The role played by traditional socio-economic explanatory variables (age and work status) was confirmed. Results are discussed in light of the need for interdisciplinary research.
References
1989). How rational is the purchase of life insurance? National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers 3063.
(1997). Preferences parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 537–579.
(2004). The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage. Brain and Cognition, 55, 30–40.
(2002). Decision-making and addiction (part I): Impaired activation of somatic states in substance dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1675–1689.
(1996). Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 215–225.
(1972). Birth order, anxiety, affiliation and the purchase of life insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 39, 93–108.
(2003). Car insurance and the risk of car crash injury. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 987–990.
(2003). Real versus facsimile reinforcers on the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 53, 207–210.
(2007). Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 86–99.
(1990). Risk aversion and the propensities for self-insurance and self-protection. Southern Economic Journal, 57, 458–467.
(1984). Examining life insurance ownership through demographic and psychographic characteristics. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 51, 453–467.
(2004). Stronger autonomic response accompanies better learning: A test of Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 901–911.
(1994). Descartes Error, Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Avon.
(2002). Reply to “Do somatic markers mediate decisions on the gambling task?” Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1104.
(2006). Psychophysiological anticipation of positive outcomes promotes advantageous decision-making in normal older persons. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 19–25.
(1985). Self-insurance, self-protection and increased risk aversion. Economics Letters, 17, 39–42.
(1984). Portfolio efficient insurance buying strategies. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 51, 205–224.
(2011). Individual risk attitudes, measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 522–550.
(1969). Expenditures for life insurance among working-wife families. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 36, 525–533.
(2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 239–271.
(1987). The effects of social security on life insurance demand by married couples. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 54, 86–99.
(2010). Oral administration of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) impairs decision making under ambiguity but not under risk: Evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task. Human Psychopharmacology, 25, 491–499.
(2010). Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion, 10, 257–265.
(1992). Propitious selection in insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 247–251.
(2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 383–451.
(1989). Risk, ambiguity, and insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 5–35.
(1981). Insurance as a Giffen good. Economics Letters, 8, 47–51.
(2007). Household life cycle protection: Life insurance holdings, financial vulnerability, and portfolio implications. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 74, 141–173.
(1996). Health insurance: The tradeoff between risk pooling and moral hazard. Journal of Health Economics, 15, 609–639.
(1991). Paying to improve your chances: Gambling or insurance? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 329–338.
(1985). Age-related reductions in workers’ life insurance. Monthly Labor Review. 29–34.
(2011). Impulsivity and household indebtedness: Evidence from real life. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 754–761.
(2010). Do ambiguity avoidance and the comparative ignorance hypothesis depend on people’s affective reactions? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40, 243–254.
(2004). Why should the poor insure? Theories of decision-making in the context of health insurance. Health Policy Plan, 19, 349–355.
(2005). The dark side of emotion in decision-making: When individuals decreased emotional reactions make more advantageous. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 85–92.
(1994). The effects of household characteristics on demand for insurance: A Tobit analysis. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 61, 492–502.
(1986). Measuring risk aversion, an alternative approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, 156–159.
(2008). Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk. Neuropsychology, 22, 645–657.
(