Abstract
Abstract. Both disgust and disease-related images appear able to induce an innate immune response but it is unclear whether these effects are independent or rely upon a common shared factor (e.g., disgust or disease-related cognitions). In this study we directly compared these two inductions using specifically generated sets of images. One set was disease-related but evoked little disgust, while the other set was disgust evoking but with less disease-relatedness. These two image sets were then compared to a third set, a negative control condition. Using a wholly within-subject design, participants viewed one image set per week, and provided saliva samples, before and after each viewing occasion, which were later analyzed for innate immune markers. We found that both the disease related and disgust images, relative to the negative control images, were not able to generate an innate immune response. However, secondary analyses revealed innate immune responses in participants with greater propensity to feel disgust following exposure to disease-related and disgusting images. These findings suggest that disgust images relatively free of disease-related themes, and disease-related images relatively free of disgust may be suboptimal cues for generating an innate immune response. Not only may this explain why disgust propensity mediates these effects, it may also imply a common pathway.
References
(2004). Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Biology, 271, 131–133.
(2009). Perceived vulnerability to disease: Development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 541–546.
(2014). Aberrant disgust responses and immune reactivity in cocaine dependent men. Biological Psychiatry, 75, 140–147.
(1978). Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER.
(2011). Behavioural defences in animals against pathogens and parasites: parallels with the pillars of modern medicine. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London Biology, 366, 3406–3417.
(2001). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
(1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behavior Research and Therapy, 33, 335–342.
(2009). Disgust as a disease avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 303–321.
(2008). Core, animal reminder and contamination disgust: Three kinds of disgust with distinct personality, behavioural, physiological and clinical correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1243–1259.
(2011). Brain-immune interactions and the neural basis of disease-avoidant ingestive behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London Biology, 366, 3389–3406.
(2008). Behavioural conditioning of immune functions: How the CNS controls peripheral immune responses by evoking associative learning processes. Reviews in Neuroscience, 19, 1–17.
(1999). Individual differences in disgust sensitivity: Comparisons and evaluations of paper-and-pencil versus behavioural measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 330–351.
(2010). Mere visual perception of others’ disease symptoms facilitates a more aggressive immune response. Psychological Science, 21, 649–652.
(2014). Disgust, insula, immune signalling and addiction. Biological Psychiatry, 5, 90–91.
(2009). Frequency and recency of infection and their relationship with disgust and contamination sensitivity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 363–368.
(2011). The effect of disgust on oral immune function. Psychophysiology, 48, 900–907.
(2012). Disgust elevates core body temperature and up-regulates certain oral immune markers. Brain, Behavior and Immunity, 26, 1160–1168.
(2009). Microbes, mating and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103–122.
