Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Article

Feature Overlap and Relevance Determine Sequential Modulations in the Simon Task

Published Online:May 07, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000239

Abstract

Abstract. Subjects usually respond faster and more accurate in trials in which the response location corresponds to a task-irrelevant stimulus location compared to when not. Previous research has shown, that this so-called Simon effect is reduced after non-corresponding compared to after corresponding trials. As of now it is yet unclear what exact mechanisms drive such sequential modulations. One theory assumes a conflict adaptation mechanism that decreases the influence of incongruent information after non-corresponding trials via increased cognitive control. However, other authors claim that feature integration processes may be the underlying mechanism as the amount of feature overlap differs between different correspondence sequences. Unfortunately, this also means that in the standard Simon task the repetition of task features and correspondence sequences are not independent. In order to address this issue, we mapped four stimuli to two responses in the present EEG study. This way, we created a task, which allows for sequences in which the stimulus identity may change without alternating the required response. These sequences may either comprise a change of the stimulus position or not and the contribution of feature integration as well as conflict adaptation processes could thus be observed independently. Our results indicate that the repetition of task features affects performance to a stronger degree than the correspondence sequence and feature integration processes do. Yet, an impact of both could still be observed. The strongest effect of feature repetitions on task performance was observed for task-relevant features, especially for the imperative stimulus identity itself. The EEG results support these findings. The amplitudes of the fronto-central N2 and the parietal P3 decreased with increasing feature overlap from one trial to the next. The posterior lateralization, reflected by the posterior contralateral negativity (PCN), however, appears to reflect mainly changes in the stimulus location and stimulus–response (S–R) correspondence rather than feature repetitions per se.

References

  • Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 206, 217–218. https://doi.org/10.1038/206217a0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, S., & Melara, R. D. (2009). Sequential effects in the Simon task: Conflict adaptation or feature integration? Brain Research, 1297, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clayson, P. E., & Larson, M. J. (2011). Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: Support for the conflict monitoring theory. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1953–1961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coles, M. G. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb01916.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 380–390. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.380 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-884X(96)95711-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eimer, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209424 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(95)00022-M First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., & Hoormann, J. (1994). Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials, 92, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(94)90055-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gajewski, P. D., Stoerig, P., & Falkenstein, M. (2008). ERP-Correlates of response selection in a response conflict paradigm. Brain Research, 1189, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.076 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.331 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756773 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoppe, K., Küper, K., & Wascher, E. (2017). Sequential modulations in a combined horizontal and vertical Simon task: Is there ERP evidence for feature integration effects? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01094 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210959 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02218.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Metzker, M., & Dreisbach, G. (2009). Bidirectional priming processes in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1770–1783. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015787 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mognon, A., Jovicich, J., Bruzzone, L., & Buiatti, M. (2011). ADJUST: An automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features. Psychophysiology, 48, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01061.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Notebaert, W., & Soetens, E. (2003). The influence of irrelevant stimulus changes on stimulus and response repetition effects. Acta Psychologica, 112, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00080-X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Petruo, V. A., Stock, A. K., Münchau, A., & Beste, C. (2016). A systems neurophysiology approach to voluntary event coding. NeuroImage, 135, 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pivik, R. T., Broughton, R. J., Coppola, R., Davidson, R. J., Fox, N., & Nuwer, M. R. (1993). Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic activity in research contexts. Psychophysiology, 30, 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02081.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, J. R., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Now you see it, now you don’t: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Acta Psychologica, 138, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027448 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. Advances in Psychology, 65, 31–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61218-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020586 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stürmer, B., & Leuthold, H. (2003). Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: A lateralized event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1579-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1345 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05181-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02125.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verleger, R., Jaskowski, P., & Wascher, E. (2005). Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.19.3.165 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Verleger, R., & Śmigasiewicz, K. (2016). Do rare stimuli evoke large P3S by being unexpected? A comparison of oddball effects between Standard-Oddball and Prediction-Oddball tasks. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 12, 88–104. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0189-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wang, Y., Kong, J., Tang, X., Zhuang, D., & Li, S. (2000). Event-related potential N270 is elicited by mental conflict processing in human brain. Neuroscience Letters, 293, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(00)01480-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wang, Y., Tian, S., Wang, H., Cui, L., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2003). Event-related potentials evoked by multi-feature conflict under different attentive conditions. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 451–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1319-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wascher, E., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(96)95602-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.3.731 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wendt, M., Heldmann, M., Münte, T. F., & Kluwe, R. H. (2007). Disentangling sequential effects of stimulus- and response-related conflict and stimulus-response repetition using brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1104–1112. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1104 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wolber, M., & Wascher, E. (2005). The posterior contralateral negativity as a temporal indicator of visuo-spatial processing. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.19.3.182 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Wühr, P. (2005). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 282–288. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196373 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar