Abstract
Abstract. Interest is a positive emotion related to attention. The event-related brain potential (ERP) probe technique is a useful method to evaluate the level of interest in dynamic stimuli. However, even in the irrelevant probe technique, the probe is presented as a physical stimulus and steals the observer’s attentional resources, although no overt response is required. Therefore, the probe might become a problematic distractor, preventing deep immersion of participants. Heartbeat-evoked brain potential (HEP) is a brain activity, time-locked to a cardiac event. No probe is required to obtain HEP data. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether the HEP can be used to evaluate the level of interest. Twenty-four participants (12 males and 12 females) watched attractive and unattractive individuals of the opposite sex in interesting and uninteresting videos (7 min each), respectively. We performed two techniques each for both the interesting and the uninteresting videos: the ERP probe and the HEP techniques. In the former, somatosensory stimuli were presented as task-irrelevant probes while participants watched videos: frequent (80%) and infrequent (20%) stimuli were presented at each wrist in random order. In the latter, participants watched videos without the probe. The P2 amplitude in response to the somatosensory probe was smaller and the positive wave amplitudes of HEP were larger while watching the videos of attractive individuals than while watching the videos of unattractive ones. These results indicate that the HEP technique is a useful method to evaluate the level of interest without an external probe stimulus.
References
2001). Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32, 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00491-3
(2008). Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm. Biological Psychology, 77, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.10.014
(2011). Naturalizing aesthetics: Brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. NeuroImage, 58, 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012
(2015). Heart evoked potential triggers brain responses to natural affective scenes: A preliminary study. Autonomic Neuroscience, 193, 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2015.06.006
(2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
(1988). Shades of joy: Patterns of appraisal differentiating pleasant emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 2, 301–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938808412702
(2011). Association between interoception and empathy: Evidence from heartbeat-evoked brain potential. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79, 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.015
(1993). Social influence, sex differences, and judgments of beauty: Putting the interpersonal back in interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.522
(1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549
(2007). Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00044.x
(2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310, 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111709
(1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(1997). Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: A review and synthesis. Biological Psychology, 45, 19–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05221-0
(1983). An analysis of the processing requirements of a complex perceptual-motor task. Human Factors, 25, 597–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088302500601
(2006). Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Current Biology, 16, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.070
(2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213
(2015). Aroused with heart: Modulation of heartbeat evoked potential by arousal induction and its oscillatory correlates. Scientific Reports, 5, 15717. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15717
(2003). Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1107–1120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1107
(2016). Consequences of beauty: Effects of rater sex and sexual orientation on the visual exploration and evaluation of attractiveness in real world scenes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00122
(1993). Heartbeat evoked potentials (HEP): Topography and influence of cardiac awareness and focus of attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(93)90001-6
(2005). Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets. NeuroImage, 28, 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.067
(1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
(2019). Increased heartbeat-evoked potential during REM sleep in nightmare disorder. NeuroImage, 22, 101701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101701
(2019). Focus of attention modulates the heartbeat evoked potential. NeuroImage, 186, 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.037
(2004). Accuracy of heartbeat perception is reflected in the amplitude of the heartbeat-evoked brain potential. Psychophysiology, 41, 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.2004.00170.x
(1992). Event-related potentials in the dual task paradigm: P300 discriminates engaging and non-engaging films when film-viewing is the primary task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 12, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(92)90060-O
(1986). From the heart to the brain: A study of heartbeat contingent scalp potentials. International Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 261–275. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207458608985677
(1998). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00013-5
(2015). Short‐term food deprivation increases amplitudes of heartbeat‐evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 52, 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12388
(2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007
(1993). Assessment of pilot performance and mental workload in rotary wing aircraft. Ergonomics, 36, 1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139308967983
(2013). Somatosensory P2 reflects resource allocation in a game task: Assessment with an irrelevant probe technique using electrical probe stimuli to shoulders. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87, 200–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.01.007
(2005). Level of interest in video clips modulates event-related potentials to auditory probes. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 55, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.06.001
(2014). The auditory N1 amplitude for task-irrelevant probes reflects visual interest. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.07.007
(2014). Electrophysiological measurement of interest during walking in a simulated environment. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 93, 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.05.012
(2012). Assessment of attentional workload while driving by eye-fixation-related potentials. Kansei Engineering International Journal, 11, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.5057/kei.11.121
(1984).
(Processing resources in attention . In R. ParasuramanD. R. DaviesEds., Varieties of attention (pp. 63–101). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.1983). Performance of concurrent tasks: Apsychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science, 221, 1080–1082. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6879207
(