Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Original Articles

Making Choices: The Development of an Assessment Procedure

Published Online:January 04, 2008https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.14.3.189

Abstract

1The present manuscript is based on the MA thesis of the second author. We would like to express our gratitude to two anonymous reviewers for the comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument for the assessment of children's understanding of processes involved in the formulation of goals, making choices, and the role of own responsibility in making choices (i. e., planning components). In the first study, a list of concepts consisting of 54 items was presented to 83 children (mean ages 10.9 and 13.9 years). Principal component analyses resulted in a list - called “Cost and Profit Concepts List” - consisting of 22 items with a three-factor structure. The factors referred to children's understanding of processes involved in making choices between goals and alternative strategies to attaining goals and their own responsibility in making choices. In the second study, the instrument was presented to 174 children divided into three age groups (mean ages 8.7, 10.8, and 13.7 years). An identical factor structure for the 22 items was found. Internal consistency reached .68. Significant age differences were present for each factorial dimension. Girls evidenced an earlier understanding than boys of the role of their own responsibility in making choices. These findings indicate that the “Cost and Profit Concepts List” is an adequate assessment instrument for children's understanding of components of planning and discriminates sufficiently between age groups.

References

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175– 1184 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dweck, C.S. (1991). Self-theories and goals: Their role in motivation, personality and development. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), New directions in attribution research (pp. 157-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Forsyth, D.R. MacMillan, J.H. (1981). Attributing affect and expectations: A test of Weiner's three-dimensional model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 393– 403 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Friedman, S.L. Scholnick, E.K. Cocking, R.R. Eds. (1987). Blueprints for thinking: The role of planning in cognitive development . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • John-Roberts, E.V. (1993). De ontwikkeling van een vragenlijst over keuzes (The development of a questionnaire dealing with choices). Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lysyuk, L.G. (submitted). The development of productive goal-setting in 2- to 4-year old children . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, L. (1989). The nature of social action: Social competence versus social conformism. In B.H. Schneider, G. Attili, J. Nadel, & R.P. Weissberg (Eds.), Social competence in developmental perspective (pp. 41-70). Dordrecht: Kluwer First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, L. (1991). The concept of action: A historical perspective. In L. Oppenheimer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The origins of action (pp. 1-35). New York: Springer-Verlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, L. Heller, J. (1984). Cognitive and social variables in the plan of action. In S.L. Friedman, E. K. Scholnick, & R.R. Cocking (Eds.), Blueprints for thinking: The role of planning in cognitive development (pp. 356-392). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pea, R.D. (1982). What is planning development the development of?. In D.L. Forbes & M.T. Greenberg (Eds.), Children's planning strategies (pp. 5-27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Skinner, E.A. (1995). Perceived control, motivation, & coping . London: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Skinner, E.A. Chapman, M. Baltes, P.B. (1988a). Control, means-ends, and agency beliefs: A new conceptualization and its measurement during childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 117– 133 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Skinner, E.A. Chapman, M. Baltes, P.B. (1988b). Beliefs about control, means-ends, and agency: Developmental differences during middle childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 11, 369– 388 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Taal, M. Sampaio de Carvalho, F. (1993). Wikken en wegen. Handleiding docent, werkboek en tekstboek . (Weigh the pros and cons. Teacher's manual, workbook and textbook). Nijmegen, NL: Berkhout First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taal, M. Sampaio de Carvalho, F. (1997). Stimulating adolescents' decision making. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 223– 226 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion . New York: Springer-Verlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar