Skip to main content
Original Articles

When Temporal Contiguity Matters

A Moderator of the Predictive Validity of Implicit Measures

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.246

Whereas several recent studies have examined the role of various personal and situational variables as moderators of the predictive validity of implicit measures, the role played by methodological factors has attracted relatively less attention. A two-session study (N = 104) investigated the influence of temporal contiguity between measurement and criterion on the validities of two implicit measures, the SC-IAT and the IAT, and an explicit measure, for predicting the results of a rapid picture-choice task. Because temporal contiguity between the independent and dependent variables can be framed in terms of accessibility, it was expected to moderate the predictive validities of the implicit but not of the explicit measures. The hypothesis was confirmed: The contiguity moderated the predictive validities of both implicit measures for the rapid picture-choice task. This moderation effect did not occur for explicit measures. Results also demonstrated that the SC-IAT did not show robust predictive validity whereas the IAT had an incremental validity for self-reported behaviors. Results are discussed in terms of the role played by construct accessibility in the predictive validity of implicit measures.

References

  • Bargh, J.A. , Chaiken, S. , Govender, R. , Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893–912. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bluemke, M. , Friese, M. (in press). Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): Assessing automatic affect toward multiple attitude objects. European Journal of Social Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Conner, M. , Perugini, M. , O’Gorman, R. , Ayres, K. , Prestwich, A. (2008). Relations between implicit and explicit measures of attitudes and measures of behavior: Evidence of moderation by individual difference variables. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1727–1740. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dijksterhuis, A. , Bargh, J.A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 1–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R.H. (1993). Variability in the likelihood of automatic attitude activation: Data reanalysis and commentary on Bargh, Chaiken, Govender, and Pratto (1992). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 753–758. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R.H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115–141. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Florack, A. , Scarabis, M. , Bless, H. (2001). When do associations matter? The use of automatic associations toward ethnic groups in person judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 518–524. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friese, M. , Hofmann, W. (2008). When and why do implicit reaction-time measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of motivation, opportunity, and process reliance. Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Friese, M. , Wänke, M. , Plessner, H. (2006). Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice. Psychology and Marketing, 23, 727–740. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , Bodenhausen, G.V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G. , McGhee, D.E. , Schwartz, J.K.L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G. , Nosek, B.A. , Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A.G. , Poehlman, T.A. , Uhlmann, E.L. , Banaji, M.R. (in press). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, E.T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E.T. Higgins, A. Kruglanski, (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. , Gawronski, B. , Gschwendner, T. , Le, H. , Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. , Rauch, W. , Gawronski, B. (2006). And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 497–504. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karpinski, A. , Steinman, R.B. (2006). The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B.A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565–584. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perugini, M. (2005). Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 29–45. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perugini, M. , Prestwich, A. (2007). The gatekeeper: Individual differences in the chain from perception to behavior. European Journal of Personality, 21, 303–317. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perugini, M. , O’Gorman, R. , Prestwich, A. (2007). An ontological test of the IAT: Self-activation can increase predictive validity. Experimental Psychology, 54, 134–147. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Richetin, J. , Perugini, M. , Adjali, I. , Hurling, R. (2007). The moderator role of intuitive versus deliberative decision making for the predictive validity of implicit and explicit measures. European Journal of Personality, 21, 529–546. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richetin, J. , Perugini, M. , Prestwich, A. , O’Gorman, R. (2007). The IAT as a predictor of spontaneous food choice: The case of fruits versus snacks. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 166–173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruys, K. , Dijksterhuis, A. , Corneille, O. (2008). On the (mis)categorization of unattractive brides and attractive prostitutes: Extending evaluative congruency effects to social category activation. Experimental Psychology, 55, 182–188. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N. , Bless, H. , Wänke, M. , Winkielman, P. (2003). Accessibility revised. In G.V. Bodenhausen, A.J. Lambert, (Eds.), Foundations of social cognition: A Festschrift in honor of Robert S. Wyer, Jr. (pp. 51–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N. , Bless, H. , Strack, F. , Klumpp, G. , Rittenauer-Schatka, H. , & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J.H. , (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar