Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Effect of Client Case Complexity on Clinical Decision Making

Published Online:January 01, 2014https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000184

Abstract

In mental health care, clinicians’ treatment decisions are expected to be based on the formulation (i.e., exploration of the causing and maintaining mechanisms) of the client’s problems. Previous research showed two things: clinicians’ case formulations mainly contain descriptive information instead of explanatory information and it is unclear to what extent treatment decisions are actually based on case formulations. In this study, we tested whether the complexity of client problems influences case formulation quality and we investigated to what extent case formulations explain treatment decisions for simple and complex client problems. Results show that case formulations for complex problems were of lower quality than those for simple problems. Also, we found that case formulations are only weakly associated with treatment decisions, for both types of problems. We conclude that clinicians give higher quality case formulations when these may be least needed, that is: for simple cases, for which an empirically supported treatment is available. Clinicians appear to base treatment decisions on descriptions of overt client symptoms rather than on case formulations.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association . (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th revised). Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bieling, P. J. , Kuyken, W. (2003). Is cognitive case formulation science or fiction? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 52–69. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.10.1.52 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Curtis, J. , Silberschatz, G. , Sampson, H. , Weiss, J. (1994). The plan formulation method. Psychotherapy Research, 4, 197–207. doi: 10.1080/10503309412331334032 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Kwaadsteniet, L. , Hagmayer, Y. , Krol, N. P. C. M. , Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Causal client models in selecting effective interventions: A cognitive mapping study. Psychological Assessment, 22, 581–592. doi: 10.1037/a0019696 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eells, T. D. (2007). Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eells, T. D. , Kendjelic, E. M. , Lucas, C. P. (1998). What’s in a case formulation? Development and use of a content coding manual. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7, 144–153. Retrieved from jppr.psychiatryonline.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eells, T. D. , Lombart, K. G. , Kendjelic, E. M. , Turner, L. C. , Lucas, C. P. (2005). The quality of psychotherapy case formulations: A comparison of expert, experienced, and novice cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic therapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 579–589. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.579 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ghaderi, A. (2006). Does individualization matter? A randomized controlled trial of standardized (focused) versus individualized (broad) cognitive behavior therapy for bulimia nervosa. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 273–288. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.02.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Godoy, A. , Haynes, S. N. (2011). Clinical case formulation: Introduction to the special section. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 1–3. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000055 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Goodman, L. A. , Kruskall, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross-classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732–764. Retrieved from www.amstat.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Haynes, S. N. , O’Brien, W. H. (1990). Functional analysis in behavior therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 649–668. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(90)90074-K First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haynes, S. N. , Spain, E. H. , Oliveira, J. (1993). Identifying causal relationships in clinical assessment. Psychological Assessment, 5, 281–291. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.3.281 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haynes, S. N. , Williams, A. E. (2003). Case formulation and design of behavioral treatment programs: Matching treatment mechanisms to causal variables for behavior problems. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 164–174. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.19.3.164 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Kuyken, W. , Fothergill, C. D. , Musa, M. , Chadwick, P. (2005). The reliability and quality of cognitive case formulation. Behavior Research and Therapy, 43, 1187–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Landis, J. R. , Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/ First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2003). Treatment utility of psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 15, 521–531. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.521 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Perry, S. , Cooper, A. M. , Michels, R. (1987). The psychodynamic formulation: Its purpose, structure, and clinical application. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 543–550. Retrieved from ajp.psychiatryonline.org/ First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Persons, J. B. (2006). Case formulation-driven psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13, 167–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00019.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Persons, J. B. , Mooney, K. A. , Padesky, C. A. (1995). Interrater reliability of cognitive-behavioral case formulations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 21–34. doi: 10.1007/BF02229674 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Persons, J. B. , Tompkins, M. A. (2007). Cognitive-behavioral case formulation. In T. D. Eells, (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schulte, D. , Künzel, R. , Pepping, G. , Schulte-Bahrenberg, T. (1992). Tailor-made versus standardized therapy of phobic patients. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14, 67–92. doi: 10.1016/0146-6402(92)90001-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Strijbos, J.-W. , Martens, R. L. , Prins, F. J. , Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29–48. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vermande, M. M. (1995). Psychodiagnostics: Classification and hypothesis generation. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Catholic University of Nijmegen, Netherlands First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vermande, M. M. , Van den Bercken, J. H. , De Bruyn, E. E. J. (1996). Effects of diagnostic classification systems on clinical hypothesis-generation. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 18, 49–70. doi: 10.1007/BF02229102 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Witteman, C. L. M. , Koele, P. (1999). Explaining treatment decisions. Psychotherapy Research, 9, 100–114. doi: 10.1080/10503309912331332621 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Witteman, C. L. M. , Kunst, H. (1997). Planning the treatment of a depressed patient. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 4, 157–171. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199709)4:3<157::AID-CPP127>3.0.CO;2-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar