A Latent State-Trait Analysis of Current Achievement Motivation Across Different Tasks of Cognitive Ability
Abstract
Abstract. The current study investigates the behavior of task-specific, current achievement motivation (CAM: interest in the task, probability of success, perceived challenge, and fear of failure) across a variety of reasoning tasks featuring verbal, numerical, and figural content. CAM is conceptualized as a state-like variable, and in order to assess the relative stability of the four CAM variables across different tasks, latent state trait analyses are conducted. The major findings indicate that the degree of challenge a test taker experiences and the fear of failing a given task appear to be relatively stable regardless of the specific task utilized, whereas interest and probability of success are more directly influenced by task-specific characteristics and demands. Furthermore, task performance is related to task-specific interest and probability of success. We discuss the implications and benefits of these results with regard to the use of cognitive ability tests in general. Importantly, taking motivational differences between test takers into account appears to offer valuable information which helps to explain differences in task performance.
References
2001). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R (IST 2000 R)
([Intelligence Structure Test 2000 R] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.
(2007). Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.
(2011). Role of test motivation in intelligence testing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 7716–7720.
(2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.
(2011). Who wants to take an intelligence test? Personality and achievement motivation in the context of ability testing. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 723–728.
(2011). Measuring current achievement motivation with the QCM: Short form development and investigation of measurement invariance. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 629–634.
(2011). Datenanalyse mit Mplus: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. 2 Aufl.
([Data analysis with Mplus: An application-oriented introduction, 2nd edition] Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.2014). Structural models of achievement motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S70.
(1991).
(The neuropsychology of temperament . In J. StrelauA. AngleitnerEds., Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement (pp. 105–128). London, UK: Plenum.1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 283–329.
(2010). Motivation und Handeln
. ([Motivation and action] . Berlin, Germany: Springer.2015).
(Student motivation: Current theories, constructs, and interventions within an expectancy value framework . In A. LipnevichF. PreckelR. RobertsEds., Psychosocial skills and school systems in the Twenty-first century: Theory, research, and applications. New York, NY: Springer.1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 23–40.
(1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–46.
(2007). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R, 2. Auflage,
([Intelligence Structure Test 2000 R, 2nd edition] Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.1983). The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 107–127.
(1953). The achievement motive. New York, NY: Irvington.
(1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. New York, NY: Science Editions.
(1998–2013). Mplus version 7 [statistical software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.
(1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen
([QCM: A questionnaire for the assessment of current motivation in learning situations] . Diagnostica, 47, 57–66.1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.
(1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
(1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389–408.
(2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35, 401–426.
(2010). Sex differences in adults’ motivation to achieve. Intelligence, 38, 433–445.
(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.
(2006). Motivational effects on self-regulated learning with different tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 239–253.
(2007). Psychometric intelligence and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Intelligence, 35, 59–68.
(1980). The role of affect in rational (attributional) approaches to human motivation. Educational Researcher, 9, 4–11.
(1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
(