Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Multistudy Report

Psychometric Properties of the Spontaneous and Deliberate Mind Wandering Scales

Published Online:June 15, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000470

Abstract

Abstract. Thinking about task-unrelated matters (mind wandering) is related to cognition and well-being. However, the relations between mind wandering and other psychological variables may depend on whether the former commence spontaneously or deliberately. The current two studies investigated the psychometric properties of the Spontaneous and Deliberate Mind Wandering Scales (SDMWS; Carriere, Seli, & Smilek, 2013). Study 1 evaluated the stability of the scales over 2 weeks (N = 284 at Time 1), whereas Study 2 (N = 323) evaluated their relations to Generalized anxiety disorder symptoms, Openness, Social desirability, and experience-sampling reports of intentional and unintentional mind wandering during an online cognitive task. The results indicated that the SDMWS were better fitted with a two-factor than a one-factor solution, although the fit was improved with the exclusion of one item. The scales exhibited strong measurement invariance across gender and time, and moderately high test-retest reliability. Spontaneous mind wandering predicted Generalized anxiety disorder and experience-sampling reports of unintentional mind wandering, whereas Deliberate mind wandering predicted Openness and experience-sampling reports of intentional mind wandering. Furthermore, Spontaneous mind wandering showed a negative association with social desirability of weak-to-medium strength. In sum, the scales generally showed favorable psychometric properties.

References

  • Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W. Y., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23, 1117–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446024 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baird, B., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011). Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1604–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barron, E., Riby, L. M., Greer, J., & Smallwood, J. (2011). Absorbed in thought: The effect of mind wandering on the processing of relevant and irrelevant events. Psychological Science, 22, 596–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611404083 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carriere, J. S. A., Seli, P., & Smilek, D. (2013). Wandering in both mind and body: Individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031438 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chiorri, C., & Vannucci, M. (2017). Replicability of the psychometric properties of trait levels measures of spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000422 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • de Leeuw, J. R., & Motz, B. A. (2015). Psychophysics in a web browser? Comparing response times collected with JavaScript and Psychophysics Toolbox in a visual search task. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0567-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Giambra, L. M. (1978). Adult male daydreaming across the life span: A replication, further analyses, and tentative norms based upon retrospective reports. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 8, 197–228. https://doi.org/10.2190%2F2bej-t9m9-mnja-l64l First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Golchert, J., Smallwood, J., Jefferies, E., Seli, P., Huntenburg, J. M., Liem, F., … Margulies, D. S. (2016). Individual variation in intentionality in the mind-wandering state is reflected in the integration of the default-mode, fronto-parietal, and limbic networks. NeuroImage, 146, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huba, G. J., Singer, J. L., Aneshensel, C. S., & Antrobus, J. S. (1982). The Short Imaginal Processes Inventory. Port Hurson, MI: Research Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kane, M. J., Gross, G. M., Chun, C. A., Smeekens, B. A., Meier, M. E., Silvia, P. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2017). For whom the mind wanders, and when, varies across laboratory and daily-life settings. Psychological Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617706086 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330, 932. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192439 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klinger, E. (1978). Dimensions of thought and imagery in normal waking states. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 4, 97–113. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marchetti, I., Koster, E. H. W., Klinger, E., & Alloy, L. B. (2016). Spontaneous thought and vulnerability to mood disorders: The dark side of the wandering mind. Clinical Psychological Science, 4, 835–857. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615622383 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marcusson-Clavertz, D., Cardeña, E., & Terhune, D. B. (2016). Daydreaming style moderates the relation between working memory and mind wandering: Integrating two hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000180 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mooneyham, B. W., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: A review. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031569 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Perkins, A. M., Arnone, D., Smallwood, J., & Mobbs, D. (2015). Thinking too much: Self-generated thought as the engine of neuroticism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Qu, W., Ge, Y., Xiong, Y., Carciofo, R., Zhao, W., & Zhang, K. (2015). The relationship between mind wandering and dangerous driving behavior among Chinese drivers. Safety Science, 78, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., & Du Toit, M. (2011). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rummel, J., & Boywitt, C. D. (2014). Controlling the stream of thought: Working memory capacity predicts adjustment of mind-wandering to situational demands. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1309–1315. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0580-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02296192 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seli, P., Jonker, T. R., Cheyne, J. A., Cortes, K., & Smilek, D. (2015). Can research participants comment authoritatively on the validity of their self-reports of mind wandering and task engagement? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 703–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000029 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seli, P., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2016a). Assessing the associations among trait and state levels of deliberate and spontaneous mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 41, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seli, P., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2016b). On the necessity of distinguishing between unintentional and intentional mind wandering. Psychological Science, 27, 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616634068 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • semTools Contributors. (2016). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.4–14. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smallwood, J. (2013). Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: A process-occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0030010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smallwood, J., Fitzgerald, A., Miles, L. K., & Phillips, L. H. (2009). Shifting moods, wandering minds: Negative moods lead the mind to wander. Emotion, 9, 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0014855 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 487–518. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smeekens, B. A., & Kane, M. J. (2016). Working memory capacity, mind wandering, and creative cognition: An individual-differences investigation into the benefits of controlled versus spontaneous thought. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 10, 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000046 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. W., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Maj, M., Van der Linden, M., & D’Argembeau, A. (2011). Mind-wandering: Phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method. Acta Psychologica, 136, 370–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stöber, J. (2001). The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.17.3.222 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Szpunar, K. K., Moulton, S. T., & Schaeter, D. L. (2013). Mind wandering and education: From the classroom to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00495 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1986). Longitudinal stability of three second-order daydreaming factors. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 5, 231–238. https://doi.org/10.2190/lkra-5jlk-1ltc-mhy0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Uziel, L. (2010). Rethinking social desirability scales: From impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369465 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wen, X., Liu, Y., Yao, L., & Ding, M. (2013). Top-down regulation of default mode activity in spatial visual attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 6444–6453. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4939-12.2013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhiyan, T., & Singer, J. L. (1997). Daydreaming styles, emotionality and the Big Five personality dimensions. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 16, 399–414. https://doi.org/10.2190/ATEH-96EV-EXYX-2ADB First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar