Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

The Multidimensional Structure of Math Anxiety Revisited

Incorporating Psychological Dimensions and Setting Factors

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000477

Abstract. The study introduces a math anxiety scale that systematically addresses psychological components, including cognitive (worry) and affective (nervousness) math anxiety when dealing with mathematical problems in mathematics-related settings (concerning tests, teachers, learning in class, working with mathematics textbooks, mathematics homework, and applying mathematics in everyday life). Our results indicate a hierarchical structure of math anxiety. Specifically, cognitive and affective math anxiety at the second-order level each determined three setting factors at the first-order level concerning evaluation (tests, teachers), learning (in class, with mathematics books, and during homework), and application (applying mathematics in everyday life). Furthermore, girls reported higher math anxiety than boys, which was particularly pronounced in the affective scale and in high-stakes academic settings, such as those involving evaluation and learning. After controlling for mathematics performance, gender effects decreased in all sub-dimensions but remained significant in affective math evaluation anxiety. Practical implications and directions for further research on cognitive and affective math anxiety are discussed.

References

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working? The American Psychologist, 56, 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.7.2.85 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baloğlu, M. & Balgalmiş, E. (2010). The adaptation of the mathematics anxiety rating scale-elementary form into Turkish, language validity, and preliminary psychometric investigation. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10, 101–110. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G. & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 1860–1863. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910967107 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A. & Szücs, D. (2016). The chicken or the egg? The direction of the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01987 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chiu, L.-H. & Henry, L. L. (1990). Development and validation of the Mathematics Anxiety Scale for Children. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 23, 121–128. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Derakshan, N. & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: New developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14, 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R. & Goetz, T. (2007a). Girls and mathematics – A hopeless issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173468 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R. & Goetz, T. (2007b). Perceived learning environment and students’ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17, 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47–77. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001047 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/749455 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ho, H.-Z., Senturk, D., Lam, A. G., Zimmer, J. M., Hong, S. & Okamoto, Y. (2000). The affective and cognitive dimensions of math anxiety: A cross-national study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 362–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/749811 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hopko, D. R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R. L. & Hunt, M. K. (2003). The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10, 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103010002008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lichtenfeld, S., Pekrun, R., Stupnisky, R. H., Reiss, K. & Murayama, K. (2012). Measuring students’ emotions in the early years: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Elementary School (AEQ-ES). Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liebert, R. M. & Morris, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety: A distinction and some initial data. Psychological Reports, 20, 975–978. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1967.20.3.975 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lukowski, S. L., DiTrapani, J., Jeon, M., Wang, Z., Schenker, V. J., & Petrill, S. A. (2016). Multidimensionality in the measurement of math-specific anxiety and its relationship with mathematical performance. Learning and Individual Differences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ma, X. & Xu, J. (2004). The causal ordering of mathematics anxiety and mathematics achievement: A longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.11.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maloney, E. A., Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C. & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents’ math anxiety on children’s math achievement and anxiety. Psychological Science, 26, 1480–1488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615592630 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plake, B. S. & Parker, C. S. (1982). The development and validation of a revised version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 551–557. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richardson, F. C. & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033456 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roick, T., Gölitz, D. & Hasselhorn, M. (2004). Deutscher Mathematiktest für dritte Klassen (DEMAT 3+) [German Mathematical Achievement Test for Third Graders]. Göttingen, Germany: Beltz Test. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Roick, T., Gölitz, D. & Hasselhorn, M. (2013). Affektive Komponenten der Mathematikkompetenz: Die Mathematikangst-Ratingskala für vierte bis sechste Klassen (MARS 4–6) [Affective components of mathematical competence: The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale for fourth to sixth graders (MARS 4–6)]. In M. HasselhornA. HeinzeW. SchneiderU. TrautweinEds., Diagnostik mathematischer Kompetenzen (pp. 205–224). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rupp, A. A., Dey, D. K. & Zumbo, B. D. (2004). To bayes or not to bayes, from whether to when: Applications of Bayesian methodology to modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 424–451. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Satake, E. & Amato, P. P. (1995). Mathematics anxiety and achievement among Japanese elementary school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 1000–1007. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Suinn, R. M., Taylor, S. & Edwards, R. W. (1988). Suinn Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale for elementary school students (MARS-E): Psychometric and normative data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 979–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164488484013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vukovic, R. K., Kieffer, M. J., Bailey, S. P. & Harari, R. R. (2013). Mathematics anxiety in young children: Concurrent and longitudinal associations with mathematical performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wigfield, A. & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.210 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yen, W. M. & Fitzpatrick, A. R. (2006). Item response theory. In R. L. BrennanEd., Educational measurement (pp. 111–153). Westport, CT: Praeger. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zyphur, M. J. & Oswald, F. L. (2015). Bayesian estimation and inference. Journal of Management, 41, 390–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313501200 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar