Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Value Beliefs About Math

A Bifactor-ESEM Representation

Published Online:April 05, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000513

Abstract

Abstract. This study proposed an improved representation of the factor structure of the Gaspard et al. (2015) value beliefs about math scale relying on bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling (B-ESEM). Using a convenience sample of 537 Italian students (327 males; Mage = 18.2), our results supported the superiority of a B-ESEM solution including nine specific factors (intrinsic, importance of achievement, personal importance, utility for school/job, utility for life, social utility, effort required, opportunity cost, and emotional cost) and one global value factor. The results further revealed that the specific factors (with the exception of personal importance) retained meaning over and above participants’ global levels of value. Finally, our results confirmed that global value beliefs predicted career aspirations, whereas expectancies of success remained the strongest predictor of math achievement.

References

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B. O., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Bayesian Structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances. Journal of Management, 41, 1561–1577. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382–393. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. SpenceEd., Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the achiever: The structure of adolescents’ academic achievement related beliefs and self-perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Enders, C. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gaspard, H., Dicke, A. L., Flunger, B., Schreier, B., Häfner, I., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2015). More value through greater differentiation: Gender differences in value beliefs about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 663–677. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gaspard, H., Häfner, I., Parrisius, C., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2017). Assessing task values in five subjects during secondary school: Measurement structure and mean level differences across grade level, gender, and academic subject. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 67–84. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gaspard, H., Wigfield, A., Jiang, Y., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Marsh, H. W. (2018). Dimensional comparisons: How academic track students’ achievements are related to their expectancy and value beliefs across multiple domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 1–14. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gignac, G. E. (2016). The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better. Intelligence, 55, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206316645653 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gudmundsson, E. (2009). Guidelines for translating and adapting psychological instruments. Nordic Psychology, 61, 29–45. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Dicke, T., Lüdtke, O., & Diallo, T. M. O. (2019). A systematic evaluation and comparison between exploratory structural equation modeling and Bayesian structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1554999 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., & Dicke, T. (2017). Extending expectancy-value theory predictions of achievement and aspirations in science: Dimensional comparison processes and expectancy-by-value interactions. Learning and Instruction, 49, 81–91. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., & Yeung, A. S. (2015). Expectancy-value in mathematics, gender and socioeconomic background as predictors of achievement and aspirations: A multi-cohort study. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 161–168. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guo, J., Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Kelava, A., Gaspard, H., Brandt, H., … Trautwein, U. (2016). Probing the unique contributions of self-concept, task values, and their interactions using multiple value facets and multiple academic outcomes. AERA Open, 2, 1–20. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Achievement, motivation, and educational choices: A longitudinal study of expectancy and value using a multiplicative perspective. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1163–1176. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades on through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Litalien, D., Morin, A. J. S., Gagné, M., Vallerand, R. J., Losier, G. F., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Evidence of a continuum structure of academic self-determination: a two-study test using a bifactor-ESEM representation of academic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 67–82. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mai, Y., Zhang, Z., & Wen, Z. (2018). Comparing Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling and existing approaches for multiple regression with latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling, 25, 737–749. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self-Description Questionnaire III: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept: A test manual and research monograph. Penrith, NSW, Australia: University of Western Sydney, SELF Research Centre. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Abu-Hilal, M., Morin, A. J. S., Abdelfattah, F., Leung, K. C., … Parker, P. (2013). Factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity of TIMSS math and science motivation measures: A comparison of Arab and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029907 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McAbee, S., Oswald, F., & Connelly, B. (2014). Bifactor models of personality and college student performance: A broad versus narrow view. European Journal of Personality, 26, 604–619. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, R. P. (1970). Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 23, 1–21. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morin, A. J. S., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 116–139. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morin, A. J. S., Arens, A. K., Tran, A., & Caci, H. (2016). Exploring sources of construct-relevant multidimensionality in psychiatric measurement. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 25, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1485 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morin, A. J. S., Boudrias, J. S., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., Madore, I., & Litalien, D. (2017). Complementary variable and person-centered approaches to the dimensionality of psychometric constructs: Application to psychological wellbeing at work. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 395–419. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morin, A. J. S., Myers, N. D., & Lee, S. (2019). Modern factor analytic techniques: Bifactor models, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and bifactor-ESEM. In G. TenenbaumR. C. EklundEds., Handbook of Sport Psychology (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M., Hau, K. T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the “x” out of expectancy-value theory? Psychological Science, 22, 1058–1066. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Organization-for-Economic-Co-operation-and-Development ‒ OECD. (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies. Paris, France: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Organization-for-Economic-Co-operation-and-Development ‒ OECD. (2007). PISA-2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris, France: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 315–329. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Perreira, T. A., Morin, A. J. S., Hebert, M., Gillet, N., Houle, S. A., & Berta, W. (2018). The short form of the Workplace Affective Commitment Multidimensional Questionnaire (WACMQ-S): A bifactor-ESEM approach among healthcare professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.12.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Revelle, W., & Wilt, J. (2013). The general factor of personality: A general critique. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 493–504. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70–83. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trautwein, U., Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Gaspard, H., Dicke, A. L., Lüdtke, O., & Jonkmann, K. (2013). Expectancy-value theory revisited. In D. M. McInerneyH. W. MarshR. G. CravenF. GuayEds., Theory driving research: New wave perspectives on self-processes and human development (pp. 233–249). Charlotte, NC: Information Age. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar