Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

Measuring Test Anxiety in Primary and Middle School Children

Psychometric Evaluation of the Test Anxiety Questionnaire for Children (TAQ-C)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000556

Abstract. The increasing use of tests to assess academic competences has been associated with higher levels of test anxiety (TA) in children, underlining the importance of identifying this emotional problem and sustain academic achievement. This study aimed to contribute to the extant literature on the assessment of TA by examining the psychometric properties of the Test Anxiety Questionnaire for Children (TAQ-C), in primary and middle school children. In Study 1 (N = 123), we selected 24 items from a wider initial pool, dividing them into scales measuring Thoughts, Autonomic Reactions, Off-Task Behaviors, and Social Derogation, to develop the TAQ-C. In Study 2 (N = 899), the psychometric properties of this set of scales were assessed in students attending primary and middle school. Analyses supported the bifactor latent structure of the TAQ-C, invariance across educational levels and gender, concurrent and convergent validity, and test–retest reliability. Overall, the TAQ-C is a promising tool for assessing TA in primary and middle school students. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

References

  • Anderson, S. B., & Sauser, W. J. (1995). Measurement of test anxiety: An overview. In C. D. SpielbergerP. R. VaagEds., Test anxiety: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 15–33). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Arens, A. K., Becker, M., & Möller, J. (2017). Social and dimensional comparisons in math and verbal test anxiety: Within- and cross-domain relations with achievement and the mediating role of academic self-concept. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandalos, D. L., Yates, K., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (1995). Effects of math self-concept, perceived self-efficacy, and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.611 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bodas, J., & Ollendick, T. H. (2005). Test anxiety: A cross-cultural perspective. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 8, 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-005-2342-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bonifay, W. E., Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., & Meijer, R. R. (2015). When are multidimensional data unidimensional enough for structural equation modeling? An evaluation of the DETECT multidimensionality index. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.938596 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borgers, N., Hox, J., & Sikkel, D. (2003). Response quality in survey research with children and adolescents: The effect of labeled response options and vague quantifiers. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/15.1.83 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bracken, B. A. (2003). TMA – Test di valutazione multidimensionale dell’autostima [Multidimensional Self Concept Scale]. Trento, Italy: Erickson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carey, E., Devine, A., Hill, F., & Szűcs, D. (2017). Differentiating anxiety forms and their role in academic performance from primary to secondary school. PLoS One, 12, e0174418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174418 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, A. K. S. (1981). Misurare l’intelligenza con i test “Culture Fair” [Cattell Culture Fair Test]. Florence, Italy: Giunti OS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caviola, S., Primi, C., Chiesi, F., & Mammarella, I. C. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) in Italian primary-school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szűcs, D., & Dowker, A. (2012). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-33 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ebesutani, C., Kim, M., & Park, H. H. (2016). The utility of the bifactor model in understanding unique components of anxiety sensitivity in a South Korean sample. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 22, 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2016.06.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Erford, B. T., Mckechnie, J. A., & Moore-Thomas, C. (2004). Program assessment and evaluation. In B. T. ErfordEd., Professional school counseling: A handbook of theories, programs & practices (pp. 303–309). Austin, TX: CAPS Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ergene, T. (2003). Effective interventions on test anxiety reduction: A meta-analysis. School Psychology International, 24, 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343030243004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friedman, I. A., & Bendas-Jacob, O. (1997). Measuring perceived test anxiety in adolescents: A self-report scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and individual differences, 7, 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170348 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/749455 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203259930 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hopko, D. R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R. L., & Hunt, M. K. (2003). The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS) construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10, 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103252351 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hurtes, K. P., & Allen, L. R. (2001). Measuring resiliency in youth: The resiliency attitudes and skills profile. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 35, 333–347. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Katsikatsou, M., Moustaki, I., Yang-Wallentin, F., & Jöreskog, K. G. (2012). Pairwise likelihood estimation for factor analysis models with ordinal data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 56, 4243–4258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2012.04.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, J. W. B., & Lang, J. (2010). Priming competence diminishes the link between cognitive test anxiety and test performance: Implications for the interpretation of test scores. Psychological Science, 21, 811–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610369492 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Larson, H., Ramahi, M., Conn, S., Este, L., & Ghibellini, A. (2010). Reducing test anxiety among third-grade students through the implementation of relaxation techniques. Journal of School Counseling, 8, 1–19. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lohbeck, A., & Petermann, F. (2018). Factorial validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS): Bifactor modeling and measurement invariance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37, 770–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918794834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowe, P. A. (2014). The Test Anxiety Measure for Adolescents (TAMA) examination of the reliability and validity of the scores of a new multidimensional measure of test anxiety for middle and high school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913520595 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowe, P. A., Grumbein, M. J., & Raad, J. M. (2011). Examination of the psychometric properties of the Test Anxiety Scale for Elementary Students (TAS-E) scores. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910395894 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowe, P. A., Lee, S. W., Witteborg, K. M., Prichard, K. W., Luhr, M. E., Cullinan, C., … Janik, M. (2008). The Test Anxiety Inventory for Children and Adolescents (TAICA) examination of the psychometric properties of a new multidimensional measure of test anxiety among elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26, 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282907303760 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mammarella, I. C., Donolato, E., Caviola, S., & Giofrè, D. (2018). Anxiety profiles and protective factors: A latent profile analysis in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mammarella, I. C., Ghisi, M., Bomba, M., Bottesi, G., Caviola, S., Broggi, F., … Nacinovich, R. (2016). Anxiety and depression in children with nonverbal learning disabilities, reading disabilities, or typical development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414529336 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20149 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, A. S. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology, 21, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410020019867 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mohr, C., & Schneider, S. (2013). Anxiety disorders. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 22, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-012-0356-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mugnaini, D., Lassi, S., La Malfa, G., & Albertini, G. (2009). Internalizing correlates of dyslexia. World Journal of Pediatrics, 5, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-009-0049-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nelson, J. M., & Harwood, H. (2011). Learning disabilities and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409359939 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nyroos, M., Korhonen, J., Peng, A., Linnanmäki, K., Svens-Liavåg, C., Bagger, A., & Sjöberg, G. (2015). Cultural and gender differences in experiences and expression of test anxiety among Chinese, Finnish, and Swedish grade 3 pupils. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 3, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2014.915773 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Putwain, D. W. (2008). Deconstructing test anxiety. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 13, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632750802027713 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Putwain, D. W., Nicholson, L. J., Connors, L., & Woods, K. (2013). Resilient children are less test anxious and perform better in tests at the end of primary schooling. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raufelder, D., & Ringeisen, T. (2016). Self-perceived competence and test anxiety. Journal of Individual Differences, 37, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000202 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W., & Haviland, M. G. (2018). Bifactor modelling and the evaluation of scale scores. In P. IrwingT. BoothD. J. HughesEds., The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development (pp. 675–707). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (2012). RCMAS-2 Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale (2nd ed.). Florence, Italy: Giunti O.S. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sarason, S. B., Davidson, K. S., Lighthall, F. F., Waite, R. R., & Ruebush, B. K. (1960). Anxiety in elementary school children. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sarason, S. B., & Mandler, G. (1952). Some correlates of test anxiety. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 810–817. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Segool, N., Carlson, J., Goforth, A., von der Embse, N., & Barterian, J. (2013). Heightened test anxiety among young children: Elementary school students’ anxious responses to high-stakes testing. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21689 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seligman, L. D., Ollendick, T. H., Langley, A. K., & Baldacci, H. B. (2004). The utility of measures of child and adolescent anxiety: A meta-analytic review of the Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children, and the Child Behavior Checklist. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3303_13 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spence, S. H. (2018). Assessing anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 23, 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12251 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van de Mortel, T. F. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 40–48. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • von der Embse, N., Barterian, J., & Segool, N. (2013). Test anxiety interventions for children and adolescents: A systematic review of treatment studies from 2000–2010. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21660 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • von der Embse, N., & Hasson, R. (2012). Test anxiety and high-stakes test performance between school settings: Implications for educators. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 56, 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2011.633285 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • von der Embse, N., Jester, D., Roy, D., & Post, J. (2018). Test anxiety effects, predictors, and correlates: A 30-year meta-analytic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.048 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • von der Embse, N., & Witmer, S. E. (2014). High-stakes accountability: Student anxiety and large-scale testing. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 30, 132–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2014.888529 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weems, C. F., Scott, B. G., Taylor, L. K., Cannon, M. F., Romano, D. M., Perry, A. M., … Triplett, V. (2010). Test anxiety prevention and intervention programs in schools: Program development and rationale. School Mental Health, 2, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-010-9032-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weems, C. F., Zakem, A. H., Costa, N. M., Cannon, M. F., & Watts, S. E. (2005). Physiological response and childhood anxiety: Association with symptoms of anxiety disorders and cognitive bias. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 712–723. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3404_13 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wren, D. G., & Benson, J. (2004). Measuring test anxiety in children: Scale development and internal construct validation. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 17, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800412331292606 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York, NY: Plenum Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar