Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Multistudy Report

Development and Psychometric Properties of the Job Insecurity Appraisals Scale (JIAS-6)

Published Online:October 19, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000611

Abstract

Abstract. This contribution introduces the Job Insecurity Appraisals Scale (JIAS-6), a tool that measures job insecurity primary appraisals (i.e., challenge and hindrance). Starting from the transactional theory of stress and extending previous unpublished versions of the same scale, the authors developed JIAS-6, using two samples of Italian workers (N1 = 204 and N2 = 328). JIAS also addresses methodological and theoretical limitations of other primary appraisal scales. In Study 1, using a calibration sample, a series of confirmatory factorial analyses (CFAs) were performed and results showed that the final version of the scale fits the data well, while Study 2 findings (using a validation sample) replicated those obtained in Study 1 and provided support for strict measurement invariance across contract type, age, and gender, while scalar invariance was supported across job insecurity levels. Furthermore, we provided evidence of the relationship between job insecurity appraisals measured by JIAS-6 and other theoretically relevant constructs. The initial validation of JIAS-6 opens several new fruitful lines of research for job insecurity scholars.

References

  • Aldwin, C. M., Sutton, K. J., Chiara, G., & Spiro, A. (1996). Age differences in stress, coping, and appraisal: Findings from the Normative Aging Study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 51, P179–P188. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/51B.4.P179 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bazzoli, A., Pasini, M., De Witte, H., Charkhabi, M., & Eastman, V. J. (2017, July). The job insecurity appraisal scale (JIAS-12). A mixed-methods approach to increase content validity. Paper presented at the 14th European Conference on Psychological Assessment, Lisbon, Portugal. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beehr, T. A., & Franz, T. M. (1986). The current debate about the meaning of job stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 8, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/j075v08n02_02 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brougham, R. R., Zail, C. M., Mendoza, C. M., & Miller, J. R. (2009). Stress, sex differences, and coping strategies among college students. Current Psychology, 28, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-009-9047-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Charkhabi, M., Pasini, M., & De Witte, H. (2015, May). Job insecurity: Hindrance or challenge? A pilot study on a job insecurity appraisal scale by the cognitive interview method. Poster presented at the Annual EAWOP Congress, Oslo, Norway. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheng, G. H. L., & Chan, D. K. S. (2008). Who suffers more form job insecurity? A meta-analytic review. Applied Psychology, 57, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00312.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chirumbolo, A., & Hellgren, J. (2003). Individual and organizational consequences of job insecurity: A European study. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24, 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x03024002004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper, C. L., Dewe, P. J., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2001). Organizational stress. A review and critique of theory, research, and applications, Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Daniels, K., Harris, C., & Briner, R. (2004). Linking work conditions to unpleasant affect: Cognition, categorization and goals. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1348/0963179041752628 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Debus, M. E., Unger, D., & König, C. J. (2019). Job insecurity and performance over time: The critical role of job insecurity duration. Career Development International, 25, 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-04-2018-0102 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Cuyper, N., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2009). Job insecurity, perceived employability and targets’ and perpetrators’ experiences of workplace bullying. Work & Stress, 23, 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370903257578 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Witte, H. (1999). Job insecurity and psychological wellbeing: Review of the literature and exploration of some unresolved issues. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398302 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Witte, H., & Näswall, K. (2003). “Objective” vs “subjective” job insecurity: Consequences of temporary work for job satisfaction and organizational commitment in four European countries. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24, 149–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X03024002002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Witte, H., Pienaar, J., & De Cuyper, N. (2016). Review of 30 years of longitudinal studies on the association between job insecurity and health and wellbeing: Is there causal evidence? Australian Psychologist, 52, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12176 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Witte, H., Vander Elst, T., & De Cuyper, N. (2015). Job insecurity, health, and well-being. In J. VuoriR. BlonkR. H. PriceEds., Sustainable working lives: Managing work transitions and health throughout the life course (pp. 109–128). Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dewe, P. J. (1991). Primary appraisal, secondary appraisal and coping: Their role in stressful work encounters. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j/2044-8325.1991.tb00564.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dewe, P. J. (1993). Measuring primary appraisal: Scale construction and directions for future research. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 8, 673–685. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dewe, P. J., & Trenberth, L. (2012). Exploring the relationships between appraisals of stressful encounters and the associated emotions in a work setting. Work & Stress, 26, 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.687042 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ferguson, E., Matthews, G., & Cox, T. (1999). The Appraisal of Life Events (ALE) scale: Reliability and validity. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910799168506 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fisher, G. G., Matthews, R. A., & Gibbons, A. M. (2015). Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039139 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.992 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Pimley, S., & Novacek, J. (1987). Age differences in stress and coping processes. Psychology and Aging, 2, 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.2.2.171 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire, NFER-Nelson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klandermans, B., Klein Hesselink, J., & van Vuuren, T. (2010). Employment status and job insecurity: On the subjective appraisal of an objective status. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31, 557–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X09358362 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kristensen, T. S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E., & Christensen, K. B. (2005). The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress, 19, 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500297720 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kruyen, P. M., Emons, W. H. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2013). On the shortcomings of shortened tests: A literature review. International Journal of Testing, 13, 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2012.703734 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Theory-based stress measurement. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0101_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S., DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Gruen, R. (1985). Stress and adaptational outcomes: The problem of confounded measures. American Psychologist, 40, 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.40.7.770 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping, Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor – hindrance stressors framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 764–775. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • LePine, M. A., Zhang, Y., Crawford, E. R., & Rich, B. L. (2016). Turning their pain into gain: Charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1036–1059. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0778 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lowe, R., & Bennett, P. (2003). Exploring coping reactions to work stress: Applications of an appraisal theory. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647247 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2017). Maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models for continuous data: Standard errors and goodness of fit. Structural Equation Modeling, 24, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1269606 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peacock, E. J., & Wong, P. T. P. (1990). The Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal. Stress & Health, 6, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2460060308 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pearsall, M. J., Ellis, A. P. J., & Stein, J. H. (2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in team: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Peeters, J. (2014). Jobonzekerheid als werkeis: hindernis of uitdaging? [Job insecurity as work demand: Hindrance or challenge?] KU Leuven (Unpublished master’s thesis). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Piccoli, B., Reisel, W. D., & De Witte, H. (2019). Understanding the relationship between job insecurity and performance: Hindrance or challenge effect? Journal of Career Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319833189 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor–hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Probst, T. M. (2005). Countering the negative effects of job insecurity through participative decision making: Lessons from the demand-control model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.320 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rodell, J. B., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1438–1451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016752 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Searle, B. J., & Auton, J. C. (2015). The merits of measuring challenge and hindrance appraisals. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28, 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2014.931378 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M., & De Witte, H. (2019). An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The UWES-3 validation across five countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35, 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000430 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Staufenbiel, T., & König, C. J. (2010). A model for the effects of job insecurity on performance, turnover intention, and absenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X401912 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vander Elst, T., Van Den Broeck, A., De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2014). On the reciprocal relationship between job insecurity and employee well-being: Mediation by perceived control? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 671–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12068 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. (2011). Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: The role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361–384. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279067 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar