Modularity of the Personality Network
Abstract
Abstract. The Five Factor Model (FFM) is the most widely used personality model; it proposes a hierarchical structure of personality with personality characteristics, facets, and factors. An increasing number of studies have challenged the FFM and a plethora of factor models with varying numbers of facets and factors have been proposed, leading to uncertainties about the structure of personality. The networked system of interactions between personality characteristics has stimulated promising progresses, however, the methodological developments needed to map the topological structure and functional organization remain scarce. This study aims to explore the hierarchical modular structure of the personality network and the functional role of personality characteristics. A sample of 345,780 individuals (Mage = 24.99, SDage = 10.00; 59.18% female) that completed the International Personality Item Pool – NEO-120 in a previous study was reanalyzed. A non-regularized method was used to estimate the personality network and ModuLand was used to characterize its modular structure. Results revealed a modular structure comprising three levels: one level with the 120 personality characteristics, a second level with 35 modules, and a third with 9 modules. Such results suggest that specific personality characteristics and modules have specialized roles in the topological structure of the personality network.
References
2006). CFinder: Locating cliques and overlapping modules in biological networks. Bioinformatics, 22, 1021–1023. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl039
(2007). Higher-order factors in a five-factor personality inventory and its relation to social desirability. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.63
(2017). Integrating Personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31(5), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115
(2016). The network structure of major depressive disorder generalized anxiety disorder and somatic symptomatology. Psychological Medicine, 46(14), 2989–2998. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716001550
(2017). Making connections: exploring the centrality of posttraumatic stress symptoms and covariates after terrorist attack. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8, 1333387. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1333387
(2018). The role of stabilizing and communicating symptoms given overlapping communities in psychopathology networks. Scientific Reports, 8, Article 5854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24224-2
(2006). The attack of psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71(3), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1447-6
(2017). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20375
(2018). Bridges between bipolar and borderline personality disorders: Clarifying comorbidity through the analysis of the complex network of connections between symptoms. The Psychologist Practice and Research Journal, 1(1).
(2019). Reopening openness to experience: A network analysis of four openness to experience inventories. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(6), 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1467428
(2015). State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003
(2016). The network of conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.10.003
(2019). Stability and variability of personality networks. A tutorial on recent developments in network psychometrics. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.011
(2015).
(Problems attack problems: A network perspective on mental disorders . In R. ScottS. KosslynEds., Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–15). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds02642012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality, 431, 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1866
(2010). Comorbidity: A network perspective. Behavioral and Brain Science, 33, 137–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09991567
(2019). Network analysis and visualization (R package version 1.2.4.1).. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/igraph.pdf
(2016). Taxonicity and network structure of generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder: An admixture analysis and complex network analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 199, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.007
(2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
(1989). Five robust trait dimensions: Development, stability, and utility. Journal of Personality, 57(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00480.x
(1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246
(2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
(2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04
(2014). The Big Five personality traits: Psychological entities or statistical constructs? Behavior Genetics, 44(6), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-013-9625-7
(2012). The network structure of human personality according to the NEO-PI-R: Matching network community structure to factor structure. PLoS One, 7(12), e51558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051558
(2017). Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research. PLoS One, 12(6), e0174035. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174035
(2008).
(Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and conceptual issues . In O. JohnW. RobinL. PervinEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). Guildford Press.2014). Measuring thirty facets of the five-factor model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003
(2019). Bridge centrality: A network approach to understanding comorbidity. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1614898
(2018). A network perspective on comorbid depression in adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 53, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.09.008
(2016). The association of posttraumatic stress disorder, complex posttraumatic stress disorder, and borderline personality disorder from a network analytical perspective. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 43, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.09.002
(2010). Community landscapes: an integrative approach to determine overlapping network module hierarchy, identify key nodes and predict network dynamics. PLoS One, 5(9), Article e12528. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012528
(2019). Expanding network analysis tools in psychological networks: Minimal spanning trees, participation coefficients, and motif analysis applied to a network of 26 psychological attributes. Complexity, 2019, Article 9424605. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9424605
(2017). The core symptoms of bulimia nervosa, anxiety, and depression: A network analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000254
(1999). Hierarchical structure of financial markets. The European Physical Journal, 11, 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050929
(2009).
(The Five-Factor Model of personality traits: Consensus and controversy . In P. CorrG. MatthewsEds., The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 148–161). Cambridge University Press.1997). Personality Trait Structure as a Human Universal. American Psychologist, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
(2008).
(The five factor theory of personality . In O. JohnW. RobinL. PervinEds., Handbook of psychotherapy theory and research (pp. 139–153). Guilford Press.1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
(1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus prosecutes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552
(2017). Co-morbid obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression: A Bayesian network approach. Psychological Medicine, 47(7), 1204–1214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716003287
(2018).
(Why do traits come together? The underlying trait and network approaches . In V. Zeigler-HillT. K. ShackelfordEds., The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: The science of personality and individual differences (pp. 130–151). Sage Reference. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451163.n62017). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000100
(2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(23), 8577–8582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103
(2005). Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature, 435(7043), 814–818. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03607
(2019). The symptoms at the center: Examining the comorbidity of posttraumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and depression with network analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 109, 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.11.016
(2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
. (2018). Successful explanations start with accurate descriptions: Questionnaire items as personality markers for more accurate predictions. European Journal of Personality, 32(3), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2147
(2003). Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research, 13(11), 2498–2504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303.metabolite
(2004). Dimensions of personality pathology: An alternative to the five-factor model. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(10), 1743–1754. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.161.10.1743
(2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and the next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
(2014). A sixth personality domain that is independent of the Big Five domains: The psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory in a Japanese sample. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12045
(2019). On non-regularized estimation of psychological networks. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 54(5), 719–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1575716
(2017). The current state and future of factor analysis in personality disorder research. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000216
(2016). 50 facets of a trait–50 ways to mess up? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000372
(