Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

Development of a 50-Item Abridged Form of the Junior Spanish Version of the NEO Questionnaire (JS NEO-A50)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000648

Abstract. The aim of this psychometric study was to construct an abridged 50-item form, 10 for each of the five factors of personality, of the Junior Spanish version of the NEO-PI-R (JS NEO-A50). Two separate studies were conducted. In Study 1, 400 high school students completed two personality scales to examine the factor structure (exploratory factor analysis), convergent validity, and reliability of the JS NEO-A50. In Study 2, an independent sample of 385 adolescents completed the JS NEO-A50 and several outcome measures to replicate the factor structure (exploratory structural equation model) and examine criterion validity, respectively. The five-factor structure found in Study 1 was satisfactorily replicated in the second, independent sample. Sources of reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) and validity (convergent) were adequate. Also, the outcome measures assessed in Study 2 were related to personality traits in the expected direction. Life satisfaction was significantly predicted by emotional stability; symptoms of behavioral problems were predicted by low scores in both agreeableness and conscientiousness while internalizing emotional symptoms were mainly predicted by emotional instability; finally, academic performance was mainly predicted by conscientiousness. We conclude that the JS NEO-A50 is a sound inventory to measure the five broad personality domains in Spanish-speaking adolescents.

References

  • Allik, J., Laidra, K., Realo, A., & Pullmann, H. (2004). Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: Changes in mean levels and structures of traits. European Journal of Personality, 18(6), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.524 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barbaranelli, C., Capara, G. V., Rabasca, A., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00051-X First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berg, J. M., Latzman, R. D., Bliwise, N. G., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2015). Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1129–1146. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., Meier, M. H., Ramrakha, S., Shalev, I., Poulton, R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science, 2(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702613497473 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castellanos-Ryan, N., Brière, F. N., O’Leary-Barrett, M., Banaschewski, T., Bokde, A., Bromberg, U., Büchel, C., Flor, H., Frouin, V., Gallinat, J., Garavan, H., Martinot, J., Nees, F., Paus, T., Pausova, Z., Rietschel, M., Smolka, M. N., Robbins, T. W., Whelan, R., … The IMAGEN Consortium. (2016). The structure of psychopathology in adolescence and its common personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(8), 1039–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000193 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Bolle, M., Beyers, W., De Clerq, B., & De Fruyt, F. (2012). General personality and psychopathology in referred and nonreferred children and adolescents: An investigation of continuity, pathoplasy, and complication models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(4), 958–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027742 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Durán-Bonavila, S., Vigil-Colet, A., Cosi, S., & Morales-Vives, F. (2017). How individual and contextual factors affects antisocial and delinquent behaviors: a comparison between young offenders, adolescents at risk of social exclusion, and a community sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01825 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Etkin, P., Mezquita, L., López-Fernández, F. J., Ortet, G., & Ibáñez, M. I. (2020). Five factor model of personality and structure of psychopathological symptoms in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, Article 110063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110063 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • European Parliament. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the council. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gale, C. R., Booth, T., Mõttus, R., Kuh, D., & Deary, I. J. (2013). Neuroticism and Extraversion in youth predict mental wellbeing and life satisfaction 40 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Galindez, E., & Casas, F. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la Student’s Life Satisfaction Scale (SLSS) con adolescentes [Adaptation and validation of the Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (SLSS) with adolescents]. Estudios de Psicología, 31(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093910790744617 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Dicke, T., Lüdtke, O., & Diallo, T. M. O. (2019). A systematic evaluation and comparison between exploratory structural equation modeling and Bayesian structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 26(4), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1554999 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huebner, E. S., Laughlin, J. E., Ash, C., & Gilman, R. (1998). Further validation of the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299801600202 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ibáñez, M. I., Camacho, L., Mezquita, L., Villa, H., Moya-Higueras, J., & Ortet, G. (2015). Alcohol expectancies mediate and moderate the associations between Big Five personality traits and adolescent alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1838. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01838 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jeronimus, B. F., Kotov, R., Riese, H., & Ormel, J. (2016). Neuroticism’s prospective association with mental disorders halves after adjustment for baseline symptoms and psychiatric history, but the adjusted association hardly decays with time: A meta-analysis on 59 longitudinal/prospective studies with 443 313 participants. Psychological Medicine, 46(14), 2883–2906. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716001653 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. JohnR. W. RobinsL. A. PervinEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, R. N. (2006). Identification of measurement differences between English and Spanish language versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination: Detecting differential item functioning using MIMIC modeling. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245250.50114.0f First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, S. E., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2011). Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.03.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Khazanov, G. K., & Ruscio, A. M. (2016). Is low positive emotionality a specific risk factor for depression? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 142(9), 991–1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000059 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “Big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020327 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mann, F. D., Patterson, M. W., Grotzinger, A. D., Kretsch, N., Tackett, J. L., Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Harden, K. P. (2016). Sensation seeking, peer deviance, and genetic influences on adolescent delinquency: Evidence for person-environment correlation and interaction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(5), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000160 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Dicke, T., Parker, P. D., & Craven, R. G. (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and set-ESEM: Optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indices and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu & Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. JohnR. W. RobinsL. A. PervinEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010). NEO Inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory – 3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory – 3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R): Professional manual, Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mervielde, I., Buyst, V., & De Fruyt, F. (1995). The validity of the Big-Five as a model for teachers’ ratings of individual differences among children aged 4–12 years. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(4), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)00175-R First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mezquita, L., Ibáñez, M. I., Villa, H., Fañanás, L., Moya-Higueras, J., & Ortet, G. (2015). Five-factor model and internalizing and externalizing syndromes: A 5-year prospective study. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(8), 1469–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morizot, J. (2014). Construct validity of adolescents’ self-reported Big Five personality traits: Importance of conceptual breadth and initial validation of a short measure. Assessment, 21(5), 580–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114524015 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moya-Higueras, J., Cuevas, A., Marques-Feixa, L., Mezquita, L., Mayoral, M., Fañanás, L., Ortet, G., & Ibáñez, M. (2018). Recent stressful life events (SLE) and adolescent mental health: Initial validation of the LEIA, a new checklist for SLE assessment according to their severity, interpersonal, and dependent nature. Assessment, 27(8), 1777–1795. https://doi.org/1073191118817648 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ortet, G., Escrivá, P., Ibáñez, M. I., Moya, J., Villa, H., Mezquita, L., & Ruipérez, M. A. (2010). Versión corta de la adaptación Española para adolescentes del NEO-PI-R (JS NEO-S) [The short version of the Junior Spanish NEO-PI-R (JS NEO-S)]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10(2), 327–344. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ortet, G., Ibáñez, M. I., Moya, J., Villa, H., Viruela, A., & Mezquita, L. (2012). Assessing the five factors of personality in adolescents: The junior version of the Spanish NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 19(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111410166 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ortet, G., Martínez, T., Mezquita, L., Morizot, J., & Ibáñez, M. I. (2017). Big Five Personality Trait Short Questionnaire: Preliminary validation with Spanish adults. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20(e7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2017.8 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ortet-Walker, J., Mezquita, L., Vidal-Arenas, V., Ortet, G., & Ibáñez, M. I. (2021). Development of a 50-item abridged form of the Junior Spanish version of the NEO questionnaire (JS NEO-A50) Supplementary Materials. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YRHC9 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oshio, A., Taku, K., Hirano, M., & Saeed, G. (2018). Resilience and Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.048 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the Five-Factor Model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Romero, E., & Alonso, C. (2017). Callous-unemotional traits and the five factor model in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.056 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sánchez-Sánchez, F., Fernández-Pinto, I., Santamaría, P., Carrasco, M., & del Barrio, V. (2016). SENA, Sistema de Evaluación de Niños y Adolescentes: Proceso de desarrollo y evidencias de fiabilidad y validez [SENA, Assessment System for Children and Adolescents: Development process and reliability and validity evidence]. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 3(2), 23–34. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The life outcomes of personality replication project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831612 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big-Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Soto, C. J., & Tackett, J. L. (2015). Personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Structure, development, and outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415589345 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stautz, K., & Cooper, A. (2013). Impulsivity-related personality traits and adolescent alcohol use: A meta-analytic review. Clinical psychology review, 33(4), 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steel, P., Schmidt, J., Bosco, F., & Uggerslev, K. (2019). The effects of personality on job satisfaction and life satisfaction: A meta-analytic investigation accounting for bandwidth-fidelity and commensurability. Human Relations, 72(2), 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718771465 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Suldo, S. M., Minch, D. R., & Hearon, B. V. (2015). Adolescent life satisfaction and personality characteristics: Investigating relationships using a Five Factor Model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(4), 965–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9544-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tackett, J. L., Slobodskaya, H. R., Mar, R. A., Deal, J., Halverson, C. F., Baker, S. R., Pavlopoulos, V., & Besevegis, E. (2012). The hierarchical structure of childhood personality in five countries: continuity from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 847–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00748.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vedel, A. (2014). The Big Five and tertiary academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vigil-Colet, A., Morales-Vives, F., Camps, E., Tous, J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Development and validation of the Overall Personality Assessment Scale (OPERAS). Psicothema, 25(1), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2011.411 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weber, M., & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Early adolescents’ personality and life satisfaction: A closer look at global vs. domain-specific satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.042 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. HoyleEd., Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Widaman, K. F., Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., & Sawalani, G. M. (2011). On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. In K. H. TrzesniewskiM. B. DonnellanR. E. LucasEds., Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists (pp. 39–61). American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar