Skip to main content
Original Article

Assessing Moral Judgment Maturity Using the Sociomoral Reflection Measure – Short Form Objective

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000680

Abstract: The Sociomoral Reflection Measure – Short Form Objective (SRM-SFO) aims to assess the reasoning and valuing components of moral judgment. A new index for measuring moral reasoning is introduced. The first study assessed construct validity by examining the structure and invariance of moral reasoning and moral value evaluation in community adolescents and adults from The Netherlands (N = 1,583). Factor analyses supported the unidimensionality of both components. Measurement invariance was found across age groups, gender, and educational levels. Convergent validity was supported by positive relationships between moral reasoning and age in males and between moral reasoning and higher educational levels. Divergent validity was supported by the weak relationship of both components with social desirability and their negative relationship with self-centered orientation and self-reported antisocial/delinquent behavior. The second study included incarcerated juvenile delinquents (N = 246). Measurement invariance was found for both components across delinquency groups. Furthermore, community participants reporting no antisocial/delinquent behavior showed higher levels on both components than community participants reporting antisocial/delinquent behavior and juvenile delinquents. The SRM-SFO provides acceptable to good psychometric properties for assessing the reasoning and valuing components of moral judgment. Its practical benefits support its use in large-scale research from young adolescence onward.

References

  • Barriga, A. Q., Morrison, E. M., Liau, A. K., & Gibbs, J. C. (2001). Moral cognition: Explaining the gender difference in antisocial behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(4), 532–562. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2001.0020 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Basinger, K. S., & Gibbs, J. C. (1987). Validation of the Sociomoral Reflection Objective Measure – Short Form. Psychological Reports, 61(1), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1987.61.1.139 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Basinger, K. S., Brugman, D., & Gibbs, J. C. (2007). The Sociomoral Reflection Measure – Short Form Objective (SRM-SFO). Universiteit Utrecht, Department of Developmental Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beerthuizen, M. G. C. J., & Brugman, D. (2016). The relationship of moral value evaluation with externalizing behaviour across value domains in adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1066669 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beerthuizen, M. G. C. J., Brugman, D., & Basinger, K. S. (2013). Oppositional defiance, moral reasoning and moral value evaluation as predictors of self-reported juvenile delinquency. Journal of Moral Education, 42(4), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2013.803955 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brugman, D. (2021a). Dataset for “Assessing moral judgment maturity using the Sociomoral Reflection Measure – Short Form Objective”. http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5205 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brugman, D. (2021b). SRM-SFO – Sociomoral Reflection Measure – Short Form Objective. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.5206 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brugman, D., & Aleva, A. E. (2004). Developmental delay or regression in moral reasoning by juvenile delinquents? Journal of Moral Education, 33(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724042000733082 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brugman, D., Podolskij, A. I., Heymans, P. G., Boom, J., Karabanova, O., & Idobaeva, O. (2003). Perception of moral atmosphere in school and norm transgressive behavior in adolescents: An intervention study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(4), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250244000272 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chabrol, H., Van Leeuwen, N., Fodgers, R. F., & Gibbs, J. C. (2011). Relations between self-serving cognitive distortions, psychopathic traits, and antisocial behavior in a non-clinical sample of adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 887–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cho, S. J., Li, F. M., & Bandalos, D. (2009). Accuracy of the parallel analysis procedure with polychoric correlations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(5), 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409332229 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. Vol. 1, Theoretical foundations and research validation. Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Faiciuc, L. (2015). Moral competence and socio-moral reflection. Series Humanistica, 13, 73–87. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed.). Prentice-Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Garmon, L. C., Basinger, K. S., Gregg, V. R., & Gibbs, J. C. (1996). Gender differences in stage and expression of moral judgment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(3), 418–437. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23089870 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbs, J. C. (2019). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman and Haidt (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., & Fuller, D. (1992). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., Grime, R. L., & Snarey, J. R. (2007). Moral judgment development across cultures: Revisiting Kohlberg’s universality claims. Developmental Review, 27(4), 443–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.04.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Helmond, P. E., Overbeek, G., & Brugman, D. (2012). Program integrity and effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral intervention for incarcerated youth on cognitive distortions, social skills, and moral development. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(9), 1720–1728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Helmond, P. E., Overbeek, G., & Brugman, D. (2014). Boosting program integrity and effectiveness of the cognitive behavioural program EQUIP for incarcerated youth in The Netherlands. Children and Youth Services Review, 39(April), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.01.022 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Høst, K., Brugman, D., Tavecchio, L. W. C., & Beem, A. L. (1998). Students’ perception of the moral atmosphere in secondary schools and the relationship between moral competence and moral atmosphere. Journal of Moral Education, 27(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724980270104 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. Harper & Row. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leenders, I., & Brugman, D. (2005). The moral/non-moral domain shift in relation to delinquent behavior in adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151004X20676 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nas, C., Brugman, D., & Koops, W. (2008). Measuring self-serving cognitive distortions with the How I Think Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.3.181 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Shields, D. L., Funk, C. D., & Bredemeier, B. L. (2018). Relationships among moral and contesting variables and prosocial and antisocial behaviour in sport. Journal of Moral Education, 47(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1350149 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stams, G. J. M. M., Brugman, D., Deković, M., Van Rosmalen, L., Van der Laan, P., & Gibbs, J. C. (2006). The moral judgment of juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(5), 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9056-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tarry, H., & Emler, N. (2007). Attitudes, values and moral reasoning as predictors of delinquency. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151006X113671 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar