Measurement Invariance of Children’s SEL Competencies
An Examination of the SSIS SEL Brief Scales With a Multi-Informant Sample From Six Countries
Abstract
Abstract. Although children use social and emotional learning skills (SEL) across the world, the expression of these skills may vary across cultures and developmental levels. Such variability complicates the process of assessing SEL competencies with consequences for understanding differences in SEL skills and developing interventions. To address these challenges, the current study examined the measurement invariance of translated versions of a brief, multi-informant (Teacher, Parent, Student) measure of SEL skills developed in the US with data from six European countries (Croatia, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Portugal, and Romania; n = 10,602; 8,520; 6,611, for the SSIS SELb – Teacher, Parent, and Student versions, respectively). In addition to cross-country invariance testing, we conducted measurement invariance testing across ages (Primary and Secondary students) for the Teacher and Student forms of the measure. Results revealed a high degree of measurement invariance across countries (Scalar for the Teacher form and Partial Scalar for the Parent and Student form) and developmental levels (Scalar for the Teacher form and Partial Scalar for the Student form), supporting the use of translated versions of the SSIS SELb for international research across these countries and developmental levels. Implications are discussed for assessment and promoting children’s SEL competencies globally.
References
2022). Examining the structural validity of the SSIS SEL Brief Scales – Teacher and Student Forms. Psychology in the Schools, 59, 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22607
(2016). Maximizing measurement efficiency of behavior rating scales using Item Response Theory: An example with the Social Skills Improvement System–Teacher Rating Scale. Journal of School Psychology, 55, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.12.005
(2020a). The SSIS SEL Brief Scales – Student Form: Initial development and validation. School Psychology, 35(4), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000390
(2020b). Multirater assessment of young children’s social and emotional learning via the SSIS SEL Brief Scales – Preschool Forms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 53, 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.07.006
(2021). Initial development and validation of the SSIS SEL Brief Scales – Teacher Form. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282920953240
(2022). Multi-informant validity evidence for the SSIS SEL Brief Scales across six European countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article
(928189 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.9281892007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
(2013). Effective social and emotional learning programs: Preschool and elementary school edition. CASEL.
. (2015). Effective social and emotional learning programs: Middle school and high school. CASEL.
. (2020, December). SEL competency framework. CASEL. https://casel.org/sel-framework/
. (2015).
(Assessment of SEL in educational contexts . In J. A. DurlakC. E. DomitrovichR. P. WeissbergT. P. GullottaEds., Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 285–300). Guilford Press.2019). Preliminary validation of the teacher‐rated DESSA in a low‐income, kindergarten sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917731460
(2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
(2020). SSIS SEL Brief Scales: User guide & technical manual. SAIL CoLab.
(2020a). SSIS SEL Brief Scales – Teacher K-12. SAIL Collaborative.
(2020b). SSIS SEL Brief Scales – Parent K-12. SAIL Collaborative.
(2020c). SSIS SEL Brief Scales – Student. SAIL Collaborative.
(2015).
(Systems for assessing and improving students’ social skills to achieve academic competence . In J. DurlakC. DomitrovichR. WeissbergT. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook for social and emotional learning (pp. 301–319). Guilford Press.in press). Screening the whole social-emotional child: Expanding a Brief SEL Assessment to include emotional behavior concerns. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1857659
(2015). semPlot: Unified visualizations of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(3), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.937847
(2022). Content analysis of the CASEL framework using K-12 State SEL Standards. School Psychology Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2030193
(2021).
(The influence of school factors on students’ self-concept: Results from PIRLS 2016 . In L. DanielaEd., Human technologies and quality of education (pp. 227–241). https://www.apgads.lu.lv/en/izdevumi/htqe-2021/16/2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58(6–7), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.466
(1990). Social skills rating system. AGS.
(2008). Social skills improvement system. Pearson.
(2017). Social skills improvement system social emotional learning edition rating forms. Pearson Assessments.
(2020). Psychometric fundamentals of the social skills improvement system: Social–emotional learning edition rating forms. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 45(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418808598
(2019). Methodological and statistical advances in the consideration of cultural diversity in assessment: A critical review of group classification and measurement invariance testing. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1481–1496. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000731
(2020). International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema, 32(3), 390–398.
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
(2013). Making the most out of school-based prevention: Lessons from the social and emotional aspects of learning (SEAL) programme. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 18(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2013.819251
(2017). ITC Guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://www.intestcom.org
. (2018). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R package Version 0.5-3) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
(2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
(2017). Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 486–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000075
(2005). Social skills training for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and learning disabilities: Problems, conclusions, and suggestions. Exceptionality, 13, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1303_2
(2015). Skills for social progress: The power of social and emotional skills. OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing.
. (2022). Exploring the dimensionality of the social skills improvement system using exploratory graph analysis and bifactor-(S − 1) modeling. Assessment, 29(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120971351
(2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
(2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
. (2004). Behavior assessment system for children (2nd ed.). American Guidance Service.
(2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
(2018). Social and emotional learning in adolescence: Testing the CASEL model in a normative sample. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(8), 1170–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617725198
(2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
(2016). Assessment in special and inclusive education (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
(2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed.). American Guidance Service.
(1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528
(2020). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: an illustration using M plus and the lavaan/semtools packages. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776
(2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
(2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88, 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
(2006).
(Evaluating between-group differences in latent variable means . In G. R. HancockR. O. MuellerEds., A second course in structural equation modeling (pp. 119–169). Wiley.2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
(Walker, H. M.Gresham, F. M. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of evidence-based practices for emotional and behavioral disorders: Applications in schools. Guilford Press.
2013). Academic learning + social-emotional learning = national priority. Phi Delta Kappa, 95, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500203
(2015).
(Social and emotional learning: Past, present, and future . In J. DurlakC. DomitrovichR. WeissbergT. GullottaEds., Handbook for social and emotional learning (pp. 3–19). Guilford Press.World Economic Forum. (Eds.) (2016). New vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_New_Vision_for_Education.pdf
2016). Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of different levels of invariance for ordered categorical outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045.
(