Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article

An Impartial Measure of Collective Action

Development and Validation of the Belief-Aligned Collective Action Scale

Published Online:March 30, 2023https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000762

Abstract

Abstract: In three studies, we developed and validated the Belief-aligned Collective Action scale (BCA), a new measure of collective action that discriminates the so far confounded engagement in collective action from the ideological stance on the issue. In Studies 1a (N = 585 Italian adult participants, 61% women) and 1b (N = 296 British adult participants, 52% women), an Exploratory Factor Analysis identified two factors, Normative and Non-normative actions. In Study 2 (N = 602 Italian adult participants, 50% women), a bifactor Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed an adequate fit of the two-factor structure. Across studies, the scale presents good internal reliability (as indicated by Cronbach’s α and ω total) and correlations in the predicted direction with common predictors of collective action, namely efficacy, anger, and group identity. Furthermore, Study 2 shows the generalizability of the scale to multiple topics, of which some are more relevant to left-wing people (e.g., wealth tax) and some to right-wing people (e.g., abortion). In these cases, we find no evidence for the effect of ideological variables such as political orientation and system justification. This tool allows researchers to assess collective action unbiasedly, contributing to the bridging of the ideological knowledge gap in the field of social psychology.

References

  • Adam-Troian, J., Mahfud, Y., Urbanska, K., & Guimond, S. (2021). The role of social identity in the explanation of collective action: An intergroup perspective on the Yellow Vests movement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(6), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12757 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Agostini, M., & van Zomeren, M. (2021). Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints. Psychological Bulletin, 147(7), 667–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000256 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Becker, J. C., Tausch, N., & Wagner, U. (2011). Emotional consequences of collective action participation: Differentiating self-directed and outgroup-directed emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1587–1598. https://doi.org/10/dkmr33 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Becker, J. C., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10/bc8d6f First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bilewicz, M., Cichocka, A., Górska, P., & Szabó, Z. P. (2015). Is liberal bias universal? An international perspective on social psychologists. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, Article e134. https://doi.org/10/gjgkh6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Caricati, L. (2008). Development and validation of a scale for measuring the Economic System Justification (ESJ). Bolletino di Psicologia Applicata, 254(6), 53–58. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cervone, C., Suitner, C., Carraro, L., & Maass, A. (2022). Validation of the Belief-Aligned Collective Action Scale [Dataset and Supplementary Materials]. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MC6NX First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Choma, B., Hodson, G., Jagayat, A., & Hoffarth, M. R. (2020). Right-wing ideology as a predictor of collective action: A test across four political issue domains. Political Psychology, 41(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10/ggf2jv First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corning, A. F., & Myers, D. J. (2002). Individual orientation toward engagement in social action. Political Psychology, 23(4), 703–729. https://doi.org/10/cqrz2s First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10/dnbgfh First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, Article e130. https://doi.org/10/f3p5gm First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duncan, L. E. (2012). The psychology of collective action. In K. DeauxM. SnyderEds., The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 780–803). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398991.013.0031 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10/f2dpm2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10/bxjdcg First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10/f74jvc First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hogan, R. T., & Emler, N. P. (1978). The biases in contemporary social psychology. Social Research, 45(3), 478–534. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40970345 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 572–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206297402 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 209–232. https://doi.org/10/dpvbc7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jussim, L., Crawford, J. T., Anglin, S. M., & Stevens, S. T. (2015). Ideological bias in social psychological research. In J. P. ForgasK. FiedlerW. D. CranoEds., Social psychology and politics (pp. 91–109). Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kelley, K., & Lai, K. (2012). MBESS. CRAN. http://www2.uaem.mx/r-mirror/web/packages/MBESS/index.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2014). MVN: An R package for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal, 6(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10/gf8944 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liu, Q., & Wang, L. (2018). DACF: Data analysis with ceiling and/or floor data. CRAN. https://cran.r-project.org/package=DACF First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mallett, R. K., Huntsinger, J. R., Sinclair, S., & Swim, J. K. (2008). Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(4), 451–470. https://doi.org/10/bq92wg First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10/dn4r8c First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Milesi, P., & Alberici, A. I. (2018). Pluralistic morality and collective action: The role of moral foundations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216675707 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Osborne, D., Sengupta, N. K., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). System justification theory at 25: Evaluating a paradigm shift in psychology and looking towards the future. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 340–361. https://doi.org/10/gg2h7w First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oser, J., & Hooghe, M. (2018). Give me your tired, your poor? Support for social citizenship rights in the United States and Europe. Sociological Perspectives, 61(1), 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417697305 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10/f3r4v8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shepherd, L., Fasoli, F., Pereira, A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2018). The role of threat, emotions, and prejudice in promoting collective action against immigrant groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10/fpdk First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shepherd, L., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2013). “This will bring shame on our nation”: The role of anticipated group-based emotions on collective action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10/ggdv2d First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10/cdtf2s First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tetlock, P. E. (1994). Political psychology or politicized psychology: Is the road to scientific hell paved with good moral intentions? Political Psychology, 15(3), 509–529. https://doi.org/10/dbnqw4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thomas, E. F., Zubielevitch, E., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2020). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823–838. https://doi.org/10/ghk52x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tropp, L. R., & Uluğ, Ö. M. (2019). Are white women showing up for racial justice? Intergroup contact, closeness to people targeted by prejudice, and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(3), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319840269 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10/c6hxh7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., & Schellhaas, F. M. H. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618–634. https://doi.org/10/f47h4b First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. https://doi.org/10/bcgdzs First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vargas-Salfate, S., Paez, D., Khan, S. S., Liu, J. H., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2018). System justification enhances well-being: A longitudinal analysis of the palliative function of system justification in 18 countries. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 567–590. https://doi.org/10/gjdzgj First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wiwad, D., Mercier, B., Maraun, M. D., Robinson, A. R., Piff, P. K., Aknin, L. B., & Shariff, A. F. (2019). The Support for Economic Inequality Scale: Development and adjudication. PLoS One, 14(6), Article e0218685. https://doi.org/10/gf9mcx First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar