Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article

Gender and Age Invariance of the Global Belief in a Just World Scale

Published Online:December 31, 2023https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000811

Abstract

Abstract: Belief in a Just World (BJW) underscores the psychological inclination of individuals to view the world as just, where outcomes typically correspond with one’s actions and behaviors. Despite the widespread application of the Global Belief in a Just World Scale (GBJWS) in the social sciences as a measure for the BJW construct, there remains an insufficient exploration of its measurement invariance across age and gender, especially among Chinese working adults. This study aims to fill this gap by using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) for gender invariance and local structural equation modeling for age invariance assessment. Statistics analyses with 2,128 participants confirmed configural, metric, and scalar invariance for gender, with latent mean comparisons revealing no significant gender differences in BJW. However, age invariance did not reach scalar invariance, suggesting caution in utilizing the one-factor structure of the GBJWS for age-related research. This investigation offers a deeper understanding of the GBJWS’s validity and responds to the pressing call for research on the scale’s applicability across diverse demographic contexts.

References

  • Bartholomaeus, J., & Strelan, P. (2019). The adaptive, approach-oriented correlates of belief in a just world for the self: A review of the research. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, Article 109485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bauer, D. J. (2017). A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000077 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beier, M. E., Kanfer, R., Kooij, D. T., & Truxillo, D. M. (2022). What’s age got to do with it? A primer and review of the workplace aging literature. Personnel Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12544 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bertrams, A. (2021). Less illusion of a just world in people with formally diagnosed autism and higher autistic traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(10), 3733–3743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04831-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brauer, K., Ranger, J., & Ziegler, M. (2023). Confirmatory factor analyses in psychological test adaptation and development: A nontechnical discussion of the WLSMV estimator. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 4(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000034 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Colquitt, J. A., Zipay, K. P., Lynch, J. W., & Outlaw, R. (2018). Bringing “The Beholder” center stage: On the propensity to perceive overall fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 148, 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.08.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. Plenum Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the Personal Belief in a Just World Scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12(2), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022091609047 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen [Belief in a just world: Validation correlates of two scales]. Psychologische Beiträge, 29(4), 596–615. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/743 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Flora, D. B. (2020). Your coefficient alpha is probably wrong, but which coefficient omega is right? A tutorial on using R to obtain better reliability estimates. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/251524592095174 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and individual differences, 34(5), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00072-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jiang, F., Yue, X., Lu, S., Yu, G., & Zhu, F. (2016). How belief in a just world benefits mental health: The effects of optimism and gratitude. Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0877-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnston, C. S., Krings, F., Maggiori, C., Meier, L. L., & Fiori, M. (2016). Believing in a personal just world helps maintain well-being at work by coloring organizational justice perceptions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(6), 945–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1192132 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hartung, J., Spormann, S. S., Moshagen, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2021). Structural differences in life satisfaction in a US adult sample across age. Journal of Personality, 89(6), 1232–1251. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12654 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hildebrandt, A., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Sommer, C., & Wilhelm, O. (2016). Exploring factor model parameters across continuous variables with local structural equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1142856 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hunt, M. O. (2000). Status, religion, and the” belief in a just world”: Comparing African Americans, Latinos, and Whites. Social Science Quarterly, 81(1), 325–343. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42864385 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kong, Y., Cui, L., Yang, Y., & Cao, M. (2021). A three-level meta-analysis of belief in a just world and antisociality: Differences between sample types and scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 182, Article 111065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111065 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koziol, N. A., & Bovaird, J. A. (2018). The impact of model parameterization and estimation methods on tests of measurement invariance with ordered polytomous data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416683754 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Laufer, A., & Shechory Bitton, M. (2021). Gender differences in the reaction to COVID-19. Women & Health, 61(8), 800–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2021.1970083 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023562 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lipkus, I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a Global Belief in a Just World Scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional Belief in a Just World Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(11), 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90081-L First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liu, L. (2023, November 18). BJW [Data, materials, supplementary materials]. https://osf.io/qcnb2 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Olaru, G., Schroeders, U., Hartung, J., & Wilhelm, O. (2019). Ant colony optimization and local weighted structural equation modeling. A tutorial on novel item and person sampling procedures for personality research. European Journal of Personality, 33(3), 400–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.219 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oppenheimer, L. (2006). The belief in a just world and subjective perceptions of society: A developmental perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Panayiotou, M., Badcock, J. C., Lim, M. H., Banissy, M. J., & Qualter, P. (2023). Measuring loneliness in different age groups: The measurement invariance of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Assessment, 30(5), 1688–1715. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221119533 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pinciotti, C. M., & Orcutt, H. K. (2021). Understanding gender differences in rape victim blaming: The power of social influence and just world beliefs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517725736 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reich, B., & Wang, X. (2015). And justice for all: Revisiting the Global Belief in a Just World Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.031 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Robitzsch, A. (2023). sirt: Supplementary item response theory models. R package version 3.13-35. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sirt First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sass, D. A., Schmitt, T. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shi, D., DiStefano, C., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Lee, T. (2022). Evaluating SEM model fit with small degrees of freedom. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 57(2–3), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, K. B., & Green, D. N. (1984). Individual correlates of the belief in a just world. Psychological Reports, 54(2), 435–438. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.54.2.435 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, R., & Stathi, S. (2021). Social dominance orientation, belief in a just world and intergroup contact as predictors of homeless stigmatisation. Journal of Social Psychology, 162(6), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1963204 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Somaraju, A. V., Nye, C. D., & Olenick, J. (2022). A review of measurement equivalence in organizational research: What’s old, what’s new, what’s next? Organizational Research Methods, 25(4), 741–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211056524 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stupnianek, K., Wu, M. S., & Schmitt, M. (2022). A school rampage threatens beliefs in justice: A longitudinal study of the belief in a just world among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Personality, 90(5), 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12691 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Westfall, R. S., Millar, M. G., & Lovitt, A. (2019). The influence of physical attractiveness on belief in a just world. Psychological Reports, 122(2), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118763172 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wu, M. S., Yan, X., Zhou, C., Chen, Y., Li, J., Zhu, Z., Shen, X., & Han, B. (2011). General belief in a just world and resilience: Evidence from a collectivistic culture. European Journal of Personality, 25(6), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.807 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar