Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.3.187

Studies carried out using the Spanish assessment instrument known as the Socialization Battery (or BAS) showed a two-level structure: six first-order components are organized at a higher level in an oblique two-factor solution, one axis being “Sociability versus Unsociability” and the other “Prosocial versus Antisocial Behavior.” In order to further analyze these constructs, a new assessment kit called Dimensions of Interpersonal Orientation (Spanish: Dimensiones de Orientación Interpersonal or DOI) was developed. The DOI kit includes both self-reports and other-reports, and can be applied to both older children or adolescents and adults. The first task of this study was to see whether the structure mentioned above (originally found in youngsters' self-reports) is replicated along the four content-equivalent forms of the DOI kit. The second and more important aim was to examine the construct validity by means of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed in youngsters (N = 562) and in adults (N = 585), using both traditional and current strategies. Results of all structural analyses are encouraging: the DOI's first- and second-order structures are well supported.

References

References

  • Achenbach, T.M. (1978). The Child Behavior Profile: I. Boys aged 6-11. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 478– 488 1979-12316-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Achenbach, T.M. Edelbrock, C.S. (1979). The Child Behavior Profile II. Boys aged 12-16 and girls aged 6-11 and 12-16. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 223– 233 1979-27624-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ackerson, L. (1931). Children's behavior problems, I. Incidence, genetic and intellectual factors . Chicago: University of Chicago Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ackerson, L. (1942). Children's behavior problems, II. Relative importance and interrelations among traits . Chicago: University of Chicago Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Benjamin, L.S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392– 425 1975-02991-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P.M. Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588– 606 1981-06898-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K.A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17, 303– 316 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M.W. Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B.M. (1989). A Primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models . New York: Springer-Verlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, D.T. Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81– 105 1960-00103-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G.V Perugini, M. Barbaranelli, C. (1994). Studies of individual differences in aggression. In M. Potegal & J. Knutson (Eds.), The dynamics of aggression: Biological and social processes (pp. 123-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carmines, E.G. McIver, S.P. (1981). Analysing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G.W. Bohrnstedt & E.F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Castanedo, C. Bueno, J.A. (1992). Conducta interpersonal y prototipos de personalidad en alumnos de E.G.B. [Interpersonal behavior and personality prototypes in elementary school children]. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 45, 295– 299 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T. McCrae, R.R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory. Manual forms S and R. . Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eysenck, H.J. (1970). The structure of human personality . London: Methuen First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Friedman, I.A. (1994). Conceptualizing and measuring teacher-perceived student behavior: Disrespect, sociability, and attentiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 949– 958 1995-19865-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gough, H.G. (1990). The California Psychological Inventory. In C.E. Watkins & V.L. Campbell (Eds.), Testing in counselling practice (pp. 37-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language . Chicago: Scientific Software International First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kanfer, F.H. Grimm, L.G. (1977). Behavioral analysis: Selecting target behaviors in the interview. Behavior Modification, 1, 7– 28 1978-21497-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kiesler, D.J. (1983). The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185– 214 1983-30243-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kiers, H.A.L. (1990). A program for simultaneous components analysis of variables measured in two or more populations . Groningen: IEC ProGamma First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kiers, H.A.L. Ten Berge, J.M.F. (1994). Hierarchical relations between methods for simultaneous component analysis and a technique for rotation to a simple simultaneous structure. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 109– 126 1994-39701-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kohn, M. (1977). Social competence, symptoms and underachievement in childhood: A longitudinal perspective . Washington, DC: Winston and Sons First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krahn, G.L. Gabriel, R.M. (1984). Quantifying categorical observations of social interactions through multidimensional scaling. Developmental Psychology, 20, 833– 843 1985-00232-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leak, G.K. Millard, R.J. Perry, N.W. Williams, D.E. (1985). An investigation of the analogical network of social interest. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 197– 207 1986-14501-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation . New York: Ronald Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lemos, S. Fidalgo, A.M. Calvo, P. Menéndez, P. (1992). Estructura factorial de la prueba YSR y su utilidad en psicopatología infanto-juvenil [Factorial structure of the YSR test and its utility in child and adolescent psychopathology]. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 18, 883– 905 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lorr, M. (1986). Interpersonal Style Inventory (ISI). Manual . Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lorr, M. (1990). Social roles and interpersonal behavior as assessed by the Interpersonal Style Inventory. In P. McReynolds, J.C. Rosen, & G.J. Chelune (Eds.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 7, pp. 39-63). New York: Plenum Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lorr, M. Manning, T.T. (1978). Higher-order personality factors of the ISI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 3– 7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H.W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335– 361 1990-18793-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H.W. Bailey, M. (1991). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod data: A comparison of alternative models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47– 70 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H.W. Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 177-198). Newbury Park, CA: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H.W. Hocevar, D. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 231– 248 1984-27743-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. Costa, P.T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the Five-Factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586– 595 1989-24689-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mehrabian, A. (1994). Evidence bearing on the Affiliative Tendency (MAFF) and Sensitivity to Rejection (MRS) scales. Current Psychology: Developmental — Learning — Personality — Social, 13, 97– 117 1995-11871-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Millsap, R.E. Meredith, W. (1988). Component analysis in cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Psychometrika, 53, 123– 134 1988-28410-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paynter, R.H. Blanchard, P. (1929). A study of educational achievement of problem children . New York: Commonwealth Fund First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Silva, F. Martínez-Ariass, R. Moro, M. Ortet, G. (1996). The assessment of interpersonal dimensions of personality. In J. Georgas et al. (Eds.), Contemporary psychology in Europe. Göttingen/Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Silva, F. Moro, M. Ortet, G. (1994). Dimensiones de orientación interpersonal: un modelo y un instrumento. [Dimensions of interpersonal orientation: A model and an instrument]. In M. Garaigordóbil & C. Maganto (Eds.), Socialización y conducta prosocial en la infancia y en la adolescencia (pp. 89-108). San Sebastián: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del Pais Vasco First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Silva, F. Ortet, G. Moro, M. Martínez-Ariass, R. in press Interpersonal orientation and personality. In J. Bermúdez et al. (Eds.), VI volume of personality psychology in Europe. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ten Berge, J.M.F. Kiers, H.A.L. Van Der Stel, V. (1992). Simultaneous components analysis. Statistica Applicata, 4, 377– 392 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Widaman, K.F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1– 26 1985-29808-001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiggins, J.S. (1982). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior in clinical psychology. In P.C. Kendall & J.N. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 183-221). New York: Wiley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wiggins, J.S. Broughton, R. (1985). The interpersonal circle. A structural model for the integration of personality research. In R. Hogan & W.H. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives in personality (Vol. 1, pp. 1-47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar