Attitudes Toward Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in the European Union: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Abstract. Attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) are increasingly recognized as central to understanding of this major social and public health problem, and guide the development of more effective prevention efforts. However, to date this area of research is underdeveloped in western societies, and in particular in the EU. The present study aims to provide a systematic review of quantitative studies addressing attitudes toward IPVAW conducted in the EU. The review was conducted through Web of Science, PsychINFO, Medline, EMBASE, PUBMED, and the Cochrane Library, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. This review aimed to identify empirical studies conducted in the EU, published in English in peer-reviewed journals from 2000 to 2018, and analyzing attitudes toward IPVAW. A total of 62 of 176 eligible articles were selected according to inclusion criteria. Four sets of attitudes toward IPVAW were identified as the main focus of the studies: legitimation, acceptability, attitudes toward intervention, and perceived severity. Four main research themes regarding attitudes toward IPVAW emerged: correlates of attitudes, attitudes as predictors, validation of scales, and attitude change interventions. Although interest in this research area has been growing in recent years, the systematic review revealed important gaps in current knowledge on attitudes toward IPVAW in the EU that limits its potential to inform public policy. The review outlines directions for future study and suggests that to better inform policy making, these future research efforts would benefit from an EU-level perspective.
References *References marked with an asterisk (*) were included as part of the systematic review.
*2013). Perceptions of gay, lesbian, and heterosexual domestic violence among undergraduates in Sweden. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 7, 249–260. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/ijcv.264
(*2014). Motivational and cognitive predictors of the propensity to intervene against intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 1877–1893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513511696
(*2006). Development and testing of the velicer attitudes toward Violence Scale: Evidence for a four-factor model. Aggressive Behaviour, 32, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20112
(2018). Intimate partner violence risk assessment in community health facilities: A Multisite Longitudinal Study. Psychosocial Intervention, 27, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a13
(2003). Do beliefs about aggression predict physical aggression to partners? Aggressive Behavior, 29, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10029
(*2015). She’s not a person… she’s just a woman! Infra-humanization and intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1567–1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514540801
(2014). Helping victims of intimate partner violence: The influence of group norms among lay people and the police. Psychology of Violence, 4, 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034844
(2001). Why battered women do not leave, part 2: External inhibiting factors – Social support and internal inhibiting factors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2, 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838001002001001
(*2016). Drop the bad attitude! Narcissism predicts acceptance of violent behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.025
(*2015). Justification beliefs of violence, myths about love and cyber dating abuse. Psicothema, 27, 327–333. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2015.59
(*2017). Understanding revenge pornography: Public perceptions of revenge pornography and victim blaming. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-09-2016-0253
(*2006). Predicting dropout of court-mandated treatment in a British sample of domestic violence offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160500337659
(*2005). An examination of the impact of community‐based rehabilitation on the offending behaviour of male domestic violence offenders and the characteristics associated with recidivism. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532505X36778
(*2008). Change in treatment has no relationship with subsequent re-offending in UK domestic violence sample: A preliminary study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 598–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X08319419
(2002). The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 833–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00833.x
(*2018). Exposure to family violence and dating violence perpetration in adolescents: Potential cognitive and emotional mechanisms. Psychology of Violence, 8, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000076
(2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359, 1331–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8
(2012). A systematic review of risk factors for partner aggression. Partner Abuse, 3, 231–280. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.231
(*2017). Responsive versus treatment-resistant perpetrators in batterer intervention programs: Personal characteristics and stages of change. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24, 936–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1347933
(2005). Attitudes and beliefs about domestic violence: Results of a public opinion survey. I. Definitions of domestic violence, criminal domestic violence, and prevalence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1197–1218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505278530
(*2018). Intimate partner violence and bystanders’ helping behaviour: An experimental study. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 10, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-08-2016-0243
(2019). The development of attitudes toward intimate partner violence: An examination of key correlates among a sample of young adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34, 1357–1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516651311
(*2015). The legitimation of wife abuse among women: The impact of belief in a just world and gender identification. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.041
(2015). Efficacy assessment of an intervention program with batterers. Small Group Research, 46, 455–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415592478
(2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science, 340, 1527–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240937
(*2015). Types of adolescent male dating violence against women, self-esteem, and justification of dominance and aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2636–2658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514553631
(Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2012/29/oj
2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867
(2001). Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: Opportunities and problems. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00257.x
(2008). Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: An observational study. The Lancet, 371, 1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60522-X
(2011). Desistance from intimate partner violence: The role of legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and social disorganization in Chicago neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9362-5
(2017). Gender Equality Index. Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005–2015. Luxembourg: Publication Office of European Union.
. (2014). Violence against women: An EU-wide survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/vaw-survey-main-results
. (2016). Measurement of adolescent dating violence: A comprehensive review (Part 2, attitudes). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.007
(*2018). Evaluation of the intervention initiative: A bystander intervention program to prevent violence against women in universities. Violence and Victims, 33, 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00074
(*2017). The acceptance of dating violence scale (ADV): Psychometric properties of the Spanish version. Psicothema, 29, 241–246. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.229
(*2018). The role of acceptance of violence beliefs and social information processing on dating violence perpetration. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12414
(2014). Gender violence as a social problem in Spain: Attitudes and acceptability. Sex Roles, 70, 506–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0322-z
(2019). Beliefs and attitudes about intimate partner violence against women in Spain. Psicothema, 31, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.206
(*2015). Risk factors for men’s lifetime perpetration of physical violence against intimate partners: Results from the international men and gender equality survey (IMAGES) in eight countries. PLoS One, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118639
(2006). The factors influencing community attitudes in relation to violence against women: A critical review of the literature. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.
(2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131
(2012). A systematic review of prevalence studies on multimorbidity: Toward a more uniform methodology. The Annals of Family Medicine, 10, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1337
(1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45–50. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.88.1.45
(*2016). Evaluating the effectiveness of domestic abuse prevention education: Are certain children more or less receptive to the messages conveyed? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21, 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12046
(*2015). Development of the attitudes to domestic violence questionnaire for children and adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2506–2525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514553115
(*2018). Psychometric properties of the inventory of beliefs about intimate partner violence (IBIPV). Anales de Psicología, 34, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.1.232901
(*2017). Tolerance and perception of abuse in youth dating relationships. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26, 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1304477
(*2017). Adaptation of the domestic violence myth acceptance scale to Portuguese and tests of its convergent, divergent, and predictive validities. Violence Against Women, 23, 1790–1810. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216666724
(2014a).
(Public attitudes toward partner violence against women . In A. C. MichalosEd., Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (Vol. 9, pp. 5192–5195). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.2014b). Intimate partner violence against women and victim-blaming attitudes among Europeans. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92, 380–381. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.131391
(*2008). Police involvement in cases of intimate partner violence against women: The influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility. Violence Against Women, 14, 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208317288
(*2009). Public responses to intimate partner violence against women: The influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 648–656. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600002018
(*2011). Police attitudes toward policing partner violence against women: Do they correspond to different psychosocial profiles? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510362892
(*2014). Male police officers’ law enforcement preferences in cases of intimate partner violence versus non-intimate interpersonal violence: Do sexist attitudes and empathy matter? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 1195–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814541655
(2006a). Acceptability of domestic violence against women in the European Union: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.036533
(*2006b). Public attitudes toward reporting partner violence against women and reporting behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 759–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00288.x
(2007) Perceived neighborhood social disorder and attitudes toward reporting domestic violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507300755
(*2009). Perceived neighborhood social disorder and attitudes toward domestic violence against women among Latin-American immigrants. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 1, 25–43.
(2015). Attitudes towards violence against women in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
(2015). The spatial epidemiology of intimate partner violence: Do neighborhoods matter? American Journal of Epidemiology, 182, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv016
(2019). Prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in Sweden and Spain: A psychometric study of the “Nordic paradox”. PLoS One, 14, e0217015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217015
(*2018). The willingness to intervene in cases of intimate partner violence against women (WI-IPVAW) scale: Development and validation of the long and short versions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01146
(2016). Intimate partner violence against women and the Nordic paradox. Social Science & Medicine, 157, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.040
(*2015). Preliminary evaluation of an analog procedure to assess acceptability of intimate partner violence against women: The partner violence acceptability movie task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01567
(*2014). Correlates of victim-blaming attitudes regarding partner violence against women among the Spanish general population. Violence Against Women, 20, 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213520577
(2016). Bridging the gaps: A global review of intersections of violence against women and violence against children. Global Health Action, 9, 31516. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.31516
(2004). Applying systematic review methods to studies of people’s views: An example from public health research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58, 794–800. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.014829
(1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4, 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004003002
(2011). What works to prevent partner violence? An evidence overview. London, UK: STRIVE, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
(2014). What works to prevent violence against women and girls? State of the field of violence against women and girls: What do we know and what are the knowledge gaps. Pretoria, South Africa: Medical Research Council.
(2015). Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: An analysis of data from population-based surveys. The Lancet Global Health, 3, e332–e340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00013-3
(2017). Acceptability of partner violence in 51 societies: The role of sexism and attitudes toward violence in social relationships. Violence Against Women, 23, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216642870
(2011). Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combatting violence against women and domestic violence. Istanbul, Turkey: Council of Europe Committee of Ministers.
. (*2018). Country of residence, gender equality and victim blaming attitudes about partner violence: a multilevel analysis in EU. The European Journal of Public Health, 28, 559–564. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx138
(2015). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: A conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet, 385, 1580–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61683-4
(2016). Understanding factors that shape gender attitudes in early adolescence globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS One, 11, e0157805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157805
(*2000). Attitudes toward domestic violence among Romanian and US university students: A cross-cultural comparison. Women & Politics, 21, 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v21n03_02
(*2014). “She deserved it” effects of sexism norms, type of violence, and victim’s pre-assault behavior on blame attributions toward female victims and approval of the aggressor’s behavior. Violence Against Women, 20, 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214528581
(2006). Factors that influence battered women to leave their abusive relationships. Violence and Victims, 21, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1891/088667006780644299
(*2015). Prevalence and correlates of young people’s sexual aggression perpetration and victimisation in 10 European countries: A multi-level analysis. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17, 682–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.989265
(*2018). “One doesn’t slap a girl but…” social representations and conditional logics in legitimization of intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 78, 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0821-4
(*2013). Ambivalent sexism, empathy and law enforcement attitudes towards partner violence against women among male police officers. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.719619
(*2010). Violence in juvenile dating relationships self-reported prevalence and attitudes in a Portuguese sample. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9268-x
(*2007). Marital Violence Inventory (IVC) and Attitudes Toward Marital Violence Scale (ECVC) manual. Braga, Portugal: Psiquilíbrios Edições.
(2007). Child and partner abuse: Self-reported prevalence and attitudes in the north of Portugal. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.11.002
(*2015). Ambivalent sexism and egalitarian ideology in perception of psychological abuse and (in) vulnerability to violence. Revista de Psicología Social, 30, 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2014.991519
(*2018). Assessing victim-blaming attitudes in cases of intimate partner violence against women: Development and validation of the VB-IPVAW scale. Psychosocial Intervention, 27, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a18
(*2018). Measuring acceptability of intimate partner violence against women: Development and validation of the A-IPVAW scale. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 10, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2018a3
(2000). Beliefs about Marital Violence scale. Braga, Portugal: Universidade do Minho, Instituto de Educação e Psicologia.
(2011). Women’s perceptions of their community’s social norms towards assisting women who have experienced intimate partner violence. Journal of Urban Health, 88, 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9546-9
(*2011). Domestic violence against women in Slovenia: A public problem? Journal of Social Policy, 18, 25–45. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v18i1.947
(*2018). The acceptance of myths about intimate partner violence against women (AMIVAW) scale: Development and validation in Spanish and English. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42, 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317742638
(2018). Multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) within an intersectional framework. Social Science & Medicine, 203, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.026
(2016). An original stepwise multilevel logistic regression analysis of discriminatory accuracy: The case of neighbourhoods and health. PLoS One, 11(4), e0153778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153778
(2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
. (*2011). Validation of the attitudes about aggression in dating situations (AADS) and the justification of verbal/coercive tactics scale (JVCT) in Spanish adolescents. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9391-3
(*2018). Beliefs on marital violence and self-reported dating violence: A comparative study of Cape Verdean and Portuguese adolescents. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 11, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-016-0099-7
(*2017). Sexualization reduces helping intentions towards female victims of intimate partner violence through mediation of moral patiency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12169
(2008). Measuring myths about domestic violence: Development and initial validation of the Domestic Violence Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770801917780
(2018). The emergence of contextual social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218756
(2018). Cultures of gendered violence: An integrative review of measures of attitudinal support for violence against women. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51, 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865816675669
(2019). The impacts of sexual media exposure on adolescent and emerging adults’ dating and sexual violence attitudes and behaviors: A critical review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20, 439–452. https://doi.org/1524838017717745
(*2015). Risk factors for intimate partner violence in prison inmates. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.003
(*2017). Effectiveness of a group intervention program for female victims of intimate partner violence. Small Group Research, 48, 34–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416675226
(1987). The inventory of beliefs about wife beating: The construction and initial validation of a measure of beliefs and attitudes. Violence and Victims, 2, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.2.1.39
(2001). Two new measures of attitudes about the acceptability of teen dating aggression. Psychological Assessment, 13, 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.3.306
(2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.09.001
(2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: A systematic review. The Lancet, 382, 859–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61030-2
(2005). Community-based norms about intimate partner violence: Putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context. Sex Roles, 53, 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7143-7
(*2011). Victim blaming and exoneration of the perpetrator in domestic violence: The role of beliefs in a just world and ambivalent sexism. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.17
(2011). Violence against women in Spain and Cuba: The same reality, two different visions. Revista de Psicología Social, 29, 150–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2013.878573
(*2001). What Slovak women perceive to be domestic violence. Sociológia, 3, 275–296.
(2014). National Community Attitudes towards Violence Against Women Survey, 2013. Research Summary. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.
. (*2014). Attributions of blame to battered women when they are perceived as feminists or as “difficult to deal with”. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.26
(2018). Psychological harm in women victims of intimate partner violence: Epidemiology and quantification of injury in mental health markers. Psychosocial Intervention, 27, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a23
(*2018). Acceptability of violence against women among the Roma population in Spain. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–18. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518807910
(2010). Mapping violence against women laws in the world: An overview of state commitments. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 64, 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.090365
(2019). Understanding the relation between neighborhoods and intimate partner violence: An integrative review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20, 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017717744
(2014). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. International Journal of Surgery, 12, 1495–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013
. (2012). Public justification of intimate partner violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012447699
(*2007). Adolescents and intimate partner violence: Evaluating a brief school-based education programme. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 45, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2007.10708093
(2016). Factors influencing attitude toward intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 29, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.06.005
(2014). Australians’ attitudes to violence against women: Full technical report, Findings from the 2013 National Community Attitudes towards Violence Against Women Survey (NCAS). Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.
(2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
. (2010). Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: Taking action and generating evidence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
. (*2017). Social perception of intimate partner violence according to the motivations and sex of the aggressor and the ideology and sex of the observers. Revista de Psicología Social, 32, 301–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2017.1297355
(2017). The role of attitudes to, and the frequency of, domestic violence encounters in the healthcare professionals’ handling of domestic violence cases. Slovenian Journal of Public Health, 56, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjph-2017-0022
(