Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Articles and Reviews

Parental Mediation Strategies and Their Role on Youths’ Online Privacy Disclosure and Protection

A Systematic Review

Published Online:August 20, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000450

Abstract

Abstract. The amount of personal information shared online every day by youths without control has raised concerns about their vulnerability to privacy disclosure. Parental mediation strategies have been considered as important aspects that can contribute to the reduction of online-related risks. However, research on this field has shown puzzling results and there is not a consistent investigation of the specific role of parental mediation in youths’ online privacy management. Therefore, this systematic review was aimed at examining the evidence for associations between different parental mediation strategies and aspects of both privacy disclosure and protection. The search was conducted in December 2019 in the SCOPUS and Web of Science scientific databases and resulted in 17 studies that have been included in our review. Taken together, the results confirm that mediation practices can be considered as important variables for the reduction of information disclosure and for enhancing privacy protection. However, some specificities emerged. Restrictive forms of mediation showed clear negative associations with disclosing behaviors, whereas active strategies showed more contrasting results. Moreover, restrictive practices seemed to be less linked to attitudes and beliefs of privacy protection than active forms. More research is needed concerning the role of co-viewing strategies. Findings were discussed in terms of future research and intervention.

References Asterisks indicate studies that were included in the systematic review

  • *Alvarez-Garcia, D., Nunez Perez, J. C., Dobarro Gonzalez, A., & Perez, C. R. (2015). Risk factors associated with cybervictimization in adolescence. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.03.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Babskie, E., & Metzger, A. (2018). Associations among adolescents’ cyber-specific beliefs and information management strategies. Journal of Family Issues, 39(3), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16664181 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baek, T. H., & Morimoto, M. (2012). Stay away from me: Examining the determinants of consumer avoidance of personalized advertising. Journal of Advertising, 41, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367410105 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berson, I. R., & Berson, M. J. (2005). Challenging online behaviors of youth: Findings from a comparative analysis of young people in the United States and New Zealand. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271532 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bryce, J., & Klang, M. (2009). Young people, disclosure of personal information and online privacy: Control, choice and consequences. Information Security Technical Report, 14, 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istr.2009.10.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buijzen, M. (2009). The effectiveness of parental communication in modifying the relation between food advertising and children’s consumption behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X334719 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Chen, H., Beaudoin, C. E., & Hong, T. (2016). Teen online information disclosure: Empirical testing of a protection motivation and social capital model. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 2871–2881. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23567 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, L., & Shi, J. (2019). Reducing harm from media: A meta-analysis of parental mediation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018754908 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Chou, H. L., Liu, Y. L., & Chou, C. (2019). Privacy behavior profiles of underage Facebook users. Computers & Education, 128, 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.083 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21, 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Common Sense Media. (2018). Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/2018_cs_socialmediasociallife_fullreport-final-release_2_lowres.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fujioka, Y., & Austin, E. W. (2003). The implications of vantage point in parental mediation of television and child’s attitudes toward drinking alcohol. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(3), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4703_6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Ho, S. S., Lwin, M. O., Yee, S. Z. H., & Lee, E. W. J. (2017). Understanding factors associated with Singaporean adolescents’ intention to adopt privacy protection behavior using and extended theory of planned behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(9), 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0061 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kirwil, L. (2009). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use in different European countries. Journal of Children and Media, 3, 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482790903233440 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kmet, L. M., Lee, R. C., & Cook, L. S. (2004). Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. https://www.ihe.ca/advancedsearch/standard-quality-assessmentcriteria-for-evaluating-primary-research-papers-from-a-varietyof-fields First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Lee, S. J., & Chae, Y. G. (2012). Balancing participation and risks in children’s Internet use: The role of Internet literacy and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0552 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Liu, C., Ang, R. P., & Lwin, M. O. (2013). Cognitive, personality, and social factors associated with adolescents’ online personal information disclosure. Journal of Adolescence, 36(4), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.03.016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Liu, C., Ang, R. P., & Lwin, M. O. (2016). Influences of narcissism and parental mediation on adolescent’s textual and visual personal information disclosure in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.060 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., & Staksrud, E. (2013). Risky social networking practices among “underage” users: Lessons for evidence-based policy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Nandagiri, R. (2019). Children’s data and privacy online: growing up in a digital age: An evidence review. London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Media and Communications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • *Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2008). Protecting children’s privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 84, 205–217. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mesch, G. S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0068 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Miyazaki, A., Stanaland, A. J., & Lwin, M. O. (2009). Self-regulatory safeguards and the online privacy of preteen children: Implications for the advertising industry. Journal of Advertising, 38(4), 79–91. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27749661 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • NHS Centre for Review and Dissemination. (2008). CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shin, W., & Huh, J. (2011). Parental mediation of teenagers' video game playing: Antecedents and consequences. New Media and Society, 13(6), 945–962. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810388025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Shin, W., Huh, J., & Faber, R. J. (2012). Tweens’ online privacy risks and the role of parental mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 632–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732135 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Shin, W., & Ismail, N. (2014). Exploring the role of parents and peers in young adolescents’ risk taking on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 578–583. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0095 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Shin, W., & Kang, H. (2016). Adolescents’ privacy concerns and information disclosure online: The role of parents and the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.062 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smahel, D., Machackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K., Livingstone, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries, EU Kids Online. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stein, C. H., Osborn, L. A., & Greenberg, S. C. (2016). Understanding young adults’ reports of contact with their parents in a digital world: Psychological and familial relationship factors. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(6), 1802–1814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0366-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stoilova, M., Nandagiri, R., & Livingstone, S. (2019). Children’s understanding of personal data and privacy online – a systematic evidence mapping. Information, Communication & Society, 24(4), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657164 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Valcke, M., De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., & Schellens, T. (2011). Long-term study of safeInternet use of young children. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1292–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Hermanns, J., & de Leeuw, R. (2013). Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: A self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, 39, 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vandoninck, S., d’Haenens, L., & Roe, K. (2013). Online risks: Coping strategies of less resilient children and teenagers across Europe. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.739780 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2012). Adolescents, online marketing and privacy: Predicting adolescents’ willingness to disclose personal information for marketing purposes. Children and Society, 27(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00423.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Ybarra, M. L. (2008). Online “predators” and their victims: Myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 63(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.2.111 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Youn, S. (2008). Parental influence and teens’ attitude toward online privacy protection. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42(3), 362–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2008.00113.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • *Youn, S., & Shin, W. (2019). Teens’ responses to Facebook newsfeed advertising: The effects of cognitive appraisal and social influence on privacy concerns and coping strategies. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.02.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar