Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Research Article

The Processometric Consensus Rorschach Test (pCRT-II) – An Improved Evaluation System

A New Method for Investigating the Functioning of Couple Relationships

Published Online:March 15, 2024https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000176

Abstract

Abstract: The processometric Consensus Rorschach Test is a method for analyzing the dynamics of couple communication in negotiation-based interactions. We present the development and first psychometric evaluation of the processometric Consensus Rorschach Test II (pCRT-II), which introduces several innovations to previous coding systems. Using the pCRT-II, couple communication can be assessed on dimensions of dominance, constructiveness, and emotional closeness. Intercoder reliability was demonstrated using intraclass correlations in three coders’ 15 pCRT-II protocols. Results showed that trained coders can code the three pCRT-II dimensions reliably. Moreover, we assessed the interactions of 155 heterosexual couples using the pCRT-II. Internal consistency tests of the scores of the three dimensions of the pCRT-II on the 10 Rorschach cards separately aggregated by gender indicated that the reliability of the scales is adequate. We also administered the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI) and the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS) to a subsample of 134 couples and tested the associations of the scales with the pCRT-II dimensions using the actor–partner interdependence model (APIM). Results demonstrated that pCRT-II has adequate concurrent validity. Based on the findings, the coding system is promising in that it can be used to gain new insights into the functioning of couples by examining their communication processes in detail.

References

  • Aschieri, F. (2013). The conjoint Rorschach comprehensive system: Reliability and validity in clinical and nonclinical couples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.717148 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Aschieri, F., Durosini, I., & Fantini, F. (2019). Observing couples discussing about “what might this be?”. Rorschachiana, 40(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000109 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Aschieri, F., & Vetere, C. (2020). Using the Rorschach as a group intervention to promote the understanding of adolescents by staff members in inpatient residential programs. Rorschachiana, 41(2), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000127 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bagdy, E. (2020). Kapcsolatdinamikai folyamatelemzés processzometriával sine morbo és klinikai esetekben [Relationship dynamics process analysis using process geometry in sine morbo and clinical cases]. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 75(1), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1556/0016.2020.00011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bagdy, E., Vetier, A., Csákvári, Z., Kiss, D. R., Vargha, A., & Bánsági, P. (2006). Processzometria: Interakciós folyamelemző eljárás a Közös Rorschach próbában [Process geometry: An interaction process analysis procedure in the Consensus Rorschach Test]. Pár- és családi kapcsolatok vizsgálata [Examining couple and family relationships]. Bölcsész Konzorcium. https://www.webcreator.hu/tankonyv First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bauman, G., & Roman, M. (1966). Interaction testing in the study of marital dominance. In E. BagdyG. BaktayZ. MirnicsEds., Family Process, 5(2), 230–242). First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, W. H. (1959). The group process in gang rape. The Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 259–266. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadisches Coping Inventar: Testmanual [Dyadic Coping Inventory: Test manual]. Huber Testverlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buck, A. A., & Neff, L. A. (2012). Stress spillover in early marriage: The role of self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(5), 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029260 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ciarrochi, J., & Blackledge, J. T. (2006). Emotional intelligence and interpersonal behaviour: A theory and review of the literature. In J. P. ForgasEd., Affect in social thinking and behavior (pp. 291–310). Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Császár-Nagy, N. (2020). Quo vadis Rorschach-teszt? A Rorschach-próba múltja, jelene, krízisei, megújulása és jövője [Quo vadis Rorschach Test? Past, present, crises, renewal and future of the Rorschach Test]. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 75(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1556/0016.2020.00003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Durosini, I., Fantini, F., Chudzik, L., & Aschieri, F. (2017). Interpreting discrepancies between the MMPI-2 and the Rorschach Inkblot test: A case report. Journal of Psychopathology, 23(4), 180–182. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Exner, J. E. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system. Basic foundations and principles of interpretation (4th ed.). Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Finn, S. E. (1996). Assessment feedback integrating MMPI-2 and Rorschach findings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_10 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Handler, L. (1997). He says, she says, they say: The consensus Rorschach. In J. R. MeloyM. W. AcklinC. B. GaconoJ. F. MurrayC. A. PetersonEds., Contemporary Rorschach interpretation (pp. 499–533). Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hartmann, E., & Opaas, M. (2023). Convergence in a multi-method study between Rorschach and self-report data of traumatized refugees assessed before and after psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 79(5), 1357–1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23484 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(1), 93–98. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Heyman, R. E., & Vivian, D. (2000). RMICS: Rapid Marital Interaction Coding System. Training manual for coders (Version 1.7). University Marital Clinic, State University of New York. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hodgson, J. H., Shields, C. G., & Rousseau, S. L. (2003). Disengaging communication in later-life couples coping with breast cancer. Families, Systems and Health, 21(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/1091-7527.21.2.145 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(2), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407596132007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kenny, D. A. (2018). Reflections on the actor–partner interdependence model. Personal Relationships, 25(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12240 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Klopfer, W. (1984). Application of the consensus Rorschach to couples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(4), 422–440. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krauser, E. L. (1964). The couples Rorschach: An approach to the understanding of marital dynamics. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 28, 55–63. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leo, K., Crenshaw, A. O., Hogan, J. N., Bourne, S. V., Baucom, K. J. W., & Baucom, B. R. W. (2021). A replication and extension of the interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior: Incorporating subjective emotional experience. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(4), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000802 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lewis, J. M., Beavers, W. R., Gossett, J. T., & Phillips, V. A. (1976). No single thread: Psychological health in family systems. Brunner/Mazel. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Loveland, N. T., Wynne, L., & Singer, M. T. (1963). The family Rorschach: A new method for studying family interaction. Family Process, 2, 187–215. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Martos, J., Sallay, V., Szabó, E., Tóth-Vajna, R., & Martos, T. (2018). Diádikus stressz és megküzdés–elméleti modellek és alkalmazások [Diadic stress and coping – Theoretical models and applications]. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 19(1), 33–54. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Martos, T., Sallay, V., Nistor, M., & Józsa, P. (2012). Párkapcsolati megküzdés és jóllét: A Páros Megküzdés Kérdőív magyar változata [Dyadic coping and well-being: The Hungarian version of the Dyadic Coping Questionnaire]. Psychiatria Hungarica, 27(6), 446–458. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Martos, T., Sallay, V., Szabó, T., Lakatos, C., & Tóth-Vajna, R. (2014). A Kapcsolati Elégedettség Skála magyar változatának (RAS-H) pszichometriai jellemzői [Psychometric characteristics of the Hungarian version of the Relationship Satisfaction Scale (RAS-H)]. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 15(3), 245–258. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Martos, T., Sallay, V., & Tóth-Vajna, R. (2016). Dyadic coping in Hungarian couples. In M. K. FalconierA. K. RandallG. BodenmannEds., Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 170–186). Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCredie, M. N., & Morey, L. C. (2019). Convergence between Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) and self-report: Another look at some old questions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(10), 1838–1849. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22826 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mérei, F. (2002). A Rorschach-próba [The Rorschach Test]. Medicina Könyvkiadó Rt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, G. J. (1997). On the integration of personality assessment methods: The Rorschach and MMPI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(2), 297–330. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6802_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Meyer, G. J. (1999). The convergent validity of MMPI and Rorschach Scales: An extension using profile scores to define response and character styles on both methods and a reexamination of simple Rorschach response frequency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa7201_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moeller, M. L. (2003). Az igazság kettesben kezdődik: A pár-beszéd fontosságáról [The truth begins in two: On the importance of couple-talk]. Pont Kiadó. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Morey, L. C., & McCredie, M. N. (2019). Convergence between Rorschach and self-report: A new look at some old questions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(1), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22701 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nakamura, S., & Nakamura, N. (1987). Family Rorschach technique. Rorschachiana, 16, 136–141. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Noy-Sharav, D. (2005). The Rorschach and TAT as relational instruments: Evaluating young couples with Consensus Rorschach and TAT. Rorschachiana, 27(1), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604.27.1.139 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Peterson, R. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/209405 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Provenzi, L., Menichetti, J., Coin, R., & Aschieri, F. (2017). Psychological assessment as an intervention with couples: Single case application of collaborative techniques in clinical practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48(2), 90–97. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roisko, R., Wahlberg, K.-E., Hakko, H., Wynne, L. C., & Tienari, P. (2011). Communication deviance in parents of families with adoptees at a high or low risk of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and its associations with attributes of the adoptee and the adoptive parents. Psychiatry Research, 185, 66–71. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rorschach, H. (1921). Psychodiagnostik (3rd ed.). Hans Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sendin, C., & Garcia Alba, C. (1994). Family changing process: Integration of two modalities of Rorschach Test administration. Rorschachiana, 19(1), 47–60. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Tarcsai, I. (1940). Pszichodiagnosztika: A Rorschach-vizsgálat és klinikai alkalmazása [Psychodiagnostics: The Rorschach Test and its clinical application]. Eggenberger’s Booksellers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ten Hove, D., Jorgensen, T., & van der Ark, A. (2022). Updated guidelines on selecting an ICC for interrater reliability: With applications to incomplete observational designs. Psychological Methods, https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000516 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tóth-Vajna, R., Vargha, A., & Császár, N. (2013). A Rorschach-teszt szexuális válaszainak változása az elmúlt 40 év során [Changes in sexual responses to the Rorschach test over the past 40 years]. Applied Psychology, 13(4), 7–21. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vajna, R. (2010). Párkapcsolati problémák tükröződése terápiás kapcsolatokban: és a terápia során bekövetkező változások [Reflection of relationship problems in therapeutic relationships: and changes in therapy] [Master’s thesis]. KGRE, Budapest. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Willi, J. (1969). Joint Rorschach testing of partner relationships. Family Process, 8(1), 64–78. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Willi, J. (1973). Der gemeinsame Rorschach-Versuch. Diagnostik von Paar- und Gruppenbeziehungen [The joint Rorschach experiment. Diagnostics of couple and group relationships]. Verlag Hans Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar