Abstract
We examined individual performance on an embedded figures test, in two separate studies. Performance measures were both the number (m) of hits (H) and the number of false alarms (FA), and their respective reaction times (RT). Using these measures, we postulated four templates of performance, indicative of field dependence (mH = low, RTH = long, mFA = high), field independence (mH = high, RTH = short, mFA = low), impulsiveness (mH = low, RTH = short, mFA = high), and reflectiveness (mH = high, RTH = long, mFA = low). In the first study, individual profiles were correlated with these four templates, whose mean values were updated in a stepwise manner, under the constraint that the individual profile had to be substantially correlated with the emerging template (r > 0.9). This procedure resulted in the final placement of a total of 64 individuals (80%) into one of the four templates. In the second study, we could identify 87% of the participants in such a manner. These participants also provided us with performance data on the rod-and-frame test (RFT), and a line-bisection task (whose analysis here is innovative), as well as scores on the sensation-seeking scales. We emphasize the utility of adopting such a finely-tuned approach to the study of the disembedding aspect of the cognitive style, and to the profiling of individual differences in general.
References
(1972). Cautionary note on measurement of field independence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 35, 479–488.
(2005). Assessment of verticality perception by a rod-and-frame test: Preliminary observations on the use of a computer monitor and video eye glasses. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 1062–1064.
(1998). Is visual anticipation of collision during self-motion related to perceptual style? Acta Psychologica, 98, 1–16.
(1982). Cognitive styles and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 106–115.
(1974). Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity. Developmental Psychology, 10, 611–632.
(1980). The solution of achromatic and chromatic embedded figures revisited. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 25–26.
(1979). Relationships between field dependence and Eysenck’s personality dimensions. The Journal of Psychology, 103, 45–49.
(1994). The psychophysical power law and unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 25, 92–107.
(1972). Cognitive styles in adolescents previously diagnosed as hyperactive. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 13, 203–209.
(1996). The speed-error trade-off problem in psychometric testing. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 105–129.
(1993). Impulsivity and information processing. In W.G. McCown J.L. Johnson M.B. Shure, Eds., The impulsive client: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 151–184). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2002). Bisecting and behavior: Lateral inattention predicts 8-week academic performance. Brain and Cognition, 50, 17–24.
(1992). Line bisecting as a predictor of personal optimism and desirability of risky behaviors. Acta Psychologica, 79, 219–226.
(1975). Subjective duration and psychophysics. Psychological Review, 82, 429–450.
(1975). Field-dependence, extraversion, and perception of the vertical: Empirical and theoretical perspectives of the Rod-and-Frame Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 683–693.
(1994). Less attention and more perception in cued line bisection. Brain and Cognition, 25, 24–33.
(2001). Cognition in the bisection task. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 460–462.
(1980). Preferences for figural complexity as a function of cognitive style. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 16, 221–224.
(1985). Longitudinal consistency of Matching Familiar Figures Test performance from early childhood to preadolescence. Developmental Psychology, 21, 262–271.
(2007). Review of Arthur R. Jensen (2006) – Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 154–158.
(1998). Embedding sensation seeking within the big three. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 1085–1099.
(2007). Extraversion, psychoticism, sensation seeking, and field dependence-independence: Will the true relationship please reveal itself? Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1175–1185.
(1978). Cognitive style: Five approaches and relevant research. New York: Wiley.
(1978). Field dependence. In H. London J. Exner, Eds., Dimensions of personality (pp. 165–215). New York: Wiley.
(1987). The nature of individual differences in field dependence. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 81–99.
(1991). Hemispheric activation vs. spatio-motor cueing in visual neglect: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 29, 165–176.
(1974). Individual differences in the detection of embedded figures. Perception and Psychophysics, 15, 47–52.
(1964). Evaluation of group and individual forms of embedded-figures measures of field-independence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, XXIV, 177–192.
(2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
(1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 17–24.
(1984). Test-retest reliability and differential patterns of score change on the Group Embedded Figures Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1405–1413.
(1995). Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: What you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology, 9, 435–448.
(1986). On the relation between spatial ability and field dependence. Intelligence, 10, 141–151.
(1990). Response bias: Characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and “nonparametric” indexes. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 401–413.
(1988). Solving the Rod-and-Frame Test in a tachistoscopic presentation: Effects of stimulus size and perceptual style. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 445–450.
(2004). Perception of the vertical with a head-mounted visual frame during head tilt. Ergonomics, 47, 1116–1130.
(1985). Individual differences in sensation seeking and attentional ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 637–639.
(1979). Autonomic and somatic responses associated with performance of the Embedded Figures Test. Psychophysiology, 16, 8–14.
(1997). Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: Psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 35, 369–380.
(1984). Measures of field dependence: Cognitive style or cognitive ability? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 593–603.
(1990). Learning implications of field dependence-independence: Cognitive style versus cognitive ability. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 425–437.
(1976). Reflection-impulsivity: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1026–1052.
(1994). The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29, 121–136.
(1996). Bridging cognition and personality in education: The role of style in performance and development. European Journal of Personality, 10, 353–376.
(1984). Reflections on impulsivity: An empirical investigation of impulsivity as a construct. In , Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 3, pp. 57–94). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
(1979). Cognitive differentiation and integration: A conceptual analysis. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 99, 3–40.
(1992). To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgments in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 30, 515–526.
(1986). Analytic and synthetic cognitive functioning: A critical review of evidence bearing on field dependence. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 1–33.
(2001). Field dependence-independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the Hidden Figures Test. Memory, 9, 445–457.
(1993). The Embedded Figures Test: Internal structure and development of a short form. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 221–224.
(1982). Field dependence and the factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire in normal subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 392–400.
(2003). “Nonparametric” A’ and other modem misconceptions about signal detection theory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 556–569.
(2003). Are psychophysical functions derived from line bisection reliable? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 72–78.
(2007). Influence of impulsivity-reflexivity when testing dynamic spatial ability: Sex and g differences. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 294–302.
(2005). Cognitive processes in the reflective-impulsive cognitive style. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166, 451–463.
(1993). Analyzing coefficients of psychophysical power functions. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 439–445.
(2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578–596.
(1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
(1994). Is there a place for ipsilesional eye patching in neglect rehabilitation? Behavioural Neurology, 7, 159–164.
(1995). Modulation of the rod-and-frame illusion by additional external stimuli. Perception, 24, 1105–1118.
(1967). Relationships of field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles to creative test performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24, 239–268.
(1982). Construct validity of perceptual style: Role of stimulus size in the Embedded Figures Test and the Rod-and-Frame Test. Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 128–138.
(2002). Why is magical ideation related to leftward deviation on an implicit line-bisection task? Cortex, 38, 247–252.
(1982). A strong developmental theory of field dependence-independence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 26, 169–178.
(1998). Field dependence-independence in second-language acquisition: Some forgotten aspects. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 1, 32–38.
(2000). Comparative analysis of different correction methods for measuring Rod-and-Frame Test performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 93–101.
(2003). Visuospatial processing and dimensions of schizotypy: Figure-ground segregation as a function of psychotic-like features. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 703–712.
(1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128–134.
(1972). The distinctiveness of field-independence. Journal of Personality, XL, 366–391.
(1991). Some open research problems on field dependence-independence: Theory and methodology. In S. Wapner J. Demick, Eds., Field dependence-independence: Cognitive style across the life span (pp. 401–429). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2001). Reflection-impulsivity, personality, and performance: A psychometric and validity study of the Matching Familiar Figures Test in detoxified alcoholics. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 731–754.
(1980). Convergent and discriminant validity of measures of cognitive styles and abilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 116–129.
(1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 19, 1–15.
(1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins – Field dependence and field independence. New York: International Universities Press.
(1979). Psychological differentiation: Current status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1127–1145.
(1971). Manual for Embedded Figures Test, Children’s Embedded Figures Test, and Group Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
(2004). Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability? Validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1295–1311.
(1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
