Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000017

The solution strategies of preschool children solving mental-rotation tasks were analyzed in two studies. In the first study n = 111 preschool children had to demonstrate their solution strategy in the Picture Rotation Test (PRT) items by thinking aloud; seven different strategies were identified. In the second study these strategies were confirmed by latent class analysis (LCA) with the PRT data of n = 565 preschool children. In addition, a close relationship was found between the solution strategy and children’s age. Results point to a stage model for the development of mental-rotation ability as measured by the PRT, going from inappropriate strategies like guessing or comparing details, to semiappropriate approaches like choosing the stimulus with the smallest angle discrepancy, to a holistic or analytic strategy. A latent transition analysis (LTA) revealed that the ability to mentally rotate objects can be influenced by training in the preschool age.

References

  • Amberger, T. (2006). Analyse von Lösungsstrategien zur Bearbeitung des Bilder-Rotations-Test mittels latenter Klassenanalyse bei Kindergartenkindern [An analysis of solution strategies used by kindergarten children for the Picture-Rotations-Test by means of latent class analysis]. Unpublished master thesis, University of Trier, Germany. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barratt, E.S. (1953). An analysis of verbal reports of solving spatial problems as an aid in defining spatial factors. Journal of Psychology, 36, 17–25. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, D. , & Kubovy, M. (1993). Mental rotation, mental representation and flat slopes. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 351–382. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Collins, L., Hyatt, S.L. , Graham, J.W. (2000). Latent transition analysis as a way of testing models of stage-sequential change in longitudinal data. In T.D. Little K.U. Schnabel J. Baumert, Eds., Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, specific examples (pp. 147–162). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cooper, L.A. (1976). Individual differences in visual comparison processes. Perception and Psychophysics, 40, 786–799. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Estes, D. (1998). Young children’s awareness of their mental activity: The case of mental rotation. Child Development, 69, 1345–1360. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • French, J.W. (1965). The relationship of problem-solving styles to the factor composition of tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 9–28. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geiser, C. , Lehmann, W., Eid, M. (2006). Separating “rotators” from “nonrotators” in the Mental Rotations Test: A multigroup latent class analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 261–293. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glück, J., Machat, R. , Jirasko, M. , & Rollett, B. (2002). Training-related changes in solution strategy in a spatial test: An application of item response models. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 1–22. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grüßing, M. (2002). Wieviel Raumvorstellung braucht man für Raumvorstellungsaufgaben? Strategien von Grundschulkindern bei der Bewältigung räumlich-geometrischer Anforderungen [How much spatial ability do you need to solve spatial tasks? Strategies used by primary-school children coping with spatial-geometrical demands]. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 34, 37–45. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hosenfeld, I., Strauss, B. , Köller, O. (1997). Geschlechtsdifferenzen bei Raumvorstellungsaufgaben – eine Frage der Strategie? [Gender differences in spatial tasks – A matter of strategy?] Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 11, 85–94. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Just, M.A. , & Carpenter, P.A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate system. Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92, 137–172. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kail, R. , Carter, P. , & Pellegrino, J. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 182–186. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kerr, N.H. , Corbitt, R. , Jurkovic, G.J. (1980). Mental rotation: Is it stage related? Journal of Mental Imagery, 4, 49–56. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Köhler, A. (2005). Zur Fähigkeit der mentalen Rotation im Vorschulalter. Eine Evaluationsstudie zum Bilder-Rotations-Test (BiRT) [Mental-rotation ability at preschool age. An evaluation study on the Picture-Rotation Test]. Unpublished master thesis, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kosslyn, S.M., Margolis, J.A. , Barrett, A.M. , Goldknopf, E.J. , Daly, P.F. (1990). Age differences in imagery abilities. Child Development, 61, 995–1010. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kyllonen, P.C., Lohman, D.F. , Snow, R.E. (1984). Effects of aptitudes, strategy training and task facets on spatial task performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 130–145. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1950a). The interpretation and computation of some latent structures. In S.A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E.A. Suchman, P.F. Lazarsfeld S.A. Star J.A. Clausen, Eds., Studies in social psychology in World War II. Vol. IV: Measurement and prediction (pp. 413–472). New Jersey: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1950b). The logical and mathematical foundation of Latent Structure Analysis. Studies in social psychology in World War II. Vol. IV: Measurement and prediction. In S.A. Stouffer L. Guttman E.A. Suchman P.F. Lazarsfeld S.A. Star J.A. Clausen, Eds., Studies in social psychology in World War II. Vol. IV: Measurement and prediction (pp. 362–412). London: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leone, G. , Traine, M.C. , Droulez, J. (1993). The influence of long-term practice on mental rotation of 3-D objects. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 241–255. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Linn, M.C. , & Petersen, A.C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability. A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lohaus, A. , Kessler, T., Thomas, H. , Gediga, G. (1994). Individuelle Unterschiede bei räumlichen Fähigkeiten im Kindesalter [Individual differences in the spatial abilities of children]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 373–390. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lohman, D.F. , Kyllonen, P.C. (1983). Individual differences in solution strategy on spatial tasks. In R.F. Dillon R.R. Schmeck, Eds., Individual differences in cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 105–135). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marke, S. (2008). Der Bilder-Rotations-Test: Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung der mentalen Rotationsfähigkeit im Vorschulalter [The Picture-Rotation Test: A measure to assess mental-rotation ability at preschool age]. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marmor, G. (1975). Development of kinetic images: When does the child first represent movement in mental images? Cognitive Psychology, 13, 548–559. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marmor, G. (1977). Mental rotation and number conservation: Are they related? Developmental Psychology, 13, 320–325. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Piaget, J. , & Inhelder, B. (1975). Die Entwicklung des räumlichen Denkens beim Kinde [The development of a child’s spatial cognition]. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2003). The mental-cutting test “Schnitte” and the Picture Rotation Test – Two new measures to assess spatial ability. International Journal of Testing, 3, 219–231. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rohe, A. (2006). Identifikation von Lösungsstrategien bei der mentalen Rotation von Vorschulkindern in einer Trainingsstudie [Identifying solution strategies of preschool children used for mental-rotation tasks in a training study]. Unpublished master thesis, University of Trier, Germany. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosser, R. (1994). The developmental course of spatial cognition: Evidence for domain multidimensionality. Child Study Journal, 24, 225–280. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosser, R.A., Ensing, S.S. , Mazzeo, J. (1985). The role of stimulus salience in young children’s ability to discriminate two-dimensional rotations: Reflections on a paradigm. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 95–103. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rüsseler, J., Scholz, J., Jordan, K. , Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2005). Mental rotation of letters, pictures and three-dimensional objects in German dyslexic children. Journal of Child Neuropsychology, 11, 497–512. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schulz, K. (1991). The contribution of solution strategy to spatial performance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 474–491. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar