Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Interactive Effect of Dispositional Cognitive Avoidance, Magnitude of Threat, and Response Efficacy on the Persuasive Impact of Threat Communications

Published Online:February 07, 2012https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000077

Abstract

This internet study investigated the effect of individual differences in cognitive avoidance on the persuasive impact of threat communications. A total of 289 participants completed a measure of dispositional cognitive avoidance and read either a high- or a low-threat communication that provided either an effective response to reduce the threat or not. We found that cognitive avoidance did not moderate the effect of magnitude of threat when response efficacy was low. By contrast, cognitive avoidance was relevant when efficacy was high: After a high-threat message, low cognitive avoiders reported more favorable attitudes toward and intentions to adopt the action recommendation than high cognitive avoiders. Further analyses showed that severity perceptions mediate this effect of avoidance on attitudes and intentions. Individual differences in cognitive avoidance are thus an important moderator of the effectiveness of threat communications.

References

  • Arthur, D. , Quester, P. (2004). Who’s afraid of this ad? Applying segmentation to the protection motivation model. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 671–696. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, S. , Locker, E. (2008). Defensive responses to an emotive antialcohol message. Psychology and Health, 24, 517–528. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Das, E. H. H., de Wit, J. B. F. , Stroebe, W. (2003). Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action recommendations: Evidence for a positive bias in the processing of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 650–664. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Hoog, N. , Stroebe, W. , de Wit, J. B. F. (2007). The impact of vulnerability to and severity of a health risk on processing and accepting of fear-arousing communications: A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 11, 258–285. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dillard, J. P. (1994). Rethinking the study of fear appeals: An emotional perspective. Communication Theory, 4, 295–323. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dillard, J. P. , Anderson, J. W. (2004). The role of fear in persuasion. Psychology and Marketing, 21, 909–926. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Egloff, B. , Krohne, H. W. (1998). Die Messung von Vigilanz und kognitiver Vermeidung: Untersuchungen mit dem Angstbewältigungs-Inventar (ABI) [The measurement of vigilance and cognitive avoidance: Investigations with the Angstbewältigungs-Inventar]. Diagnostica, 44, 189–200. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Floyd, D. L. , Prentice-Dunn, S. , Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407–429. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hock, M. , Krohne, H. W. (2004). Coping with threat and memory for ambiguous information: Testing the repressive discontinuity hypothesis. Emotion, 4, 65–86. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krohne, H. W. (2003). Individual differences in emotional reactions and coping. In R. J. Davidson K. R. Scherer H. H. Goldsmith, Eds., Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 698–725). New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krohne, H. W. , Egloff, B. , Varner, L. J. , Burns, L. R. , Weidner, G. , Ellis, H. C. (2000). The assessment of dispositional vigilance and cognitive avoidance: Factorial structure, psychometric properties, and validity of the Mainz Coping Inventory (MCI). Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 297–311. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liberman, A. , Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669–679. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mowen, J. C. , Harris, E. G. , Bone, S. A. (2004). Personality traits and fear response to print advertisements: Theory and an empirical study. Psychology and Marketing, 21, 927–943. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nestler, S. , Egloff, B. (2010). When scary messages backfire: Influence of dispositional cognitive avoidance on the effectiveness of threat communications. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 137–141. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nielsen, J. , Shapiro, S. (2009). Coping with fear through suppression and avoidance of threatening information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 258–274. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rogers, W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology, 91, 93–114. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ruiter, R. A. C. , Abraham, C. , Kok, G. (2001). Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health, 16, 613–630. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ruiter, R. A. C. , Verplanken, B. , Cremer, D. , Kok, G. (2004). Danger and fear control in fear appeals: The role of need for cognition. Basic and Applied Psychology, 26, 13–24. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Williams-Piehota, P. , Pizarro, J. , Schneider, T. R. , Mowad, L. , Salovey, P. (2005). Matching health messages to monitor-blunter coping styles to motivate screening mammography. Health Psychology, 24, 58–67. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Witte, K. , Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 608–632. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Witte, K. , Morrison, K. (2000). Examining the influence of trait anxiety/repression-sensitization on individuals’ reactions to fear appeals. Western Journal of Communication, 64, 1–27. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar