Skip to main content
Original Article

Exposure to an Infidelity Threat Manipulation

The Role of Adult Attachment Dimensions in Anticipated Relationship Evaluation Responses

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000196

Abstract. The associations between adult attachment dimensions and responses to romantic relationship threats have been investigated in recent years. The present study extended the results of previous studies by examining whether attachment dimensions moderated the anticipated responses that individuals had to the imagined infidelity of their romantic partners. College student participants (N = 243) were randomly assigned to imagine either a high threat scenario (i.e., finding their partner having sex with someone else) or a low threat scenario (i.e., hearing a couple on television having sex) and report their anticipated responses to these scenarios. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that the attachment dimensions moderated the anticipated responses of participants to the imagined infidelity of their romantic partners but the exact patterns of these results were different than we expected. For example, individuals with low levels of attachment avoidance provided more positive evaluations of their romantic relationships than individuals with high levels of attachment avoidance in the low threat condition but this difference did not emerge in the high threat condition. These findings suggest that low levels of attachment avoidance may be most beneficial for romantic relationships when there is relatively little threat to the relationship. Further, men with high levels of attachment anxiety reported relatively positive evaluations of their relationships in the high threat condition compared to men with low levels of attachment anxiety or women (regardless of their level of attachment anxiety). Discussion focuses on the implications these results may have for understanding the connections between attachment and relationship evaluations under conditions of threat.

References

  • Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Aron, A., Aron, E. R. & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartholomew, K. & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Besser, A. & Priel, B. (2009). Emotional responses to a romantic partner’s imaginary rejection: The roles of attachment anxiety, covert narcissism, and self-evaluation. Journal of Personality, 77, 287–325. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Besser, A. & Priel, B. (2010). Grandiose narcissism versus vulnerable narcissism in threatening situations: Emotional reactions to achievement failure and interpersonal rejection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 874–903. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Besser, A. & Priel, B. (2011). Dependency, self-criticism and negative affective responses following imaginary rejection and failure threats: Meaning-making processes as moderators or mediators. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 74, 33–42. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Sadness and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L. & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. SimpsonW. S. RholesEds., Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J. & Westen, D. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy: Not gone, not forgotten, and not explained by alternative hypotheses. Psychological Science, 7, 373–375. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D. & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cann, A., Mangum, J. L. & Wells, M. (2001). Distress in response to relationship infidelity: The roles of gender and attitudes about relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 185–190. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cassidy, J. & Kobak, R. R. (1988). Avoidance and its relationship with other defensive processes. In J. BelskyT. NezworskiEds., Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 300–323). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crowell, J. A., Fraley, R. C. & Shaver, P. R. (1999). Measurement of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In J. CassidyP.R. ShaverEds., Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 434–465). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ein-Dor, T., Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2011). Attachment insecurities and the processing of threat-related information: Studying the schemas involved in insecure people’s coping strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 78–93. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fairchild, A. J. & Finney, S. J. (2006). Investigating validity evidence for the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 116–135. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G. & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 50, 93–98. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levy, K. N. & Kelly, K. M. (2010). Sex differences in jealousy: A contribution from attachment theory. Psychological Science, 21, 168–173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, B., Oliver, L. & Roth, D. (2005). Please don’t leave me! BIS/BAS, attachment styles, and responses to relationship threat. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 151–162. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G., Woddis, D. & Nachmias, O. (2000). Stress and accessibility of promixity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 78, 509–523. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mikulincer, M. & Florian, V. (1995). Appraisal and coping with a real-life stressful situation: The contribution of attachment styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 408–416. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53–152). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R. & Pereg, D. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 77–102. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M. & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical implications and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M. & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shaver, P. R. & Mikulincer, M. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment and Human Development, 4, 133–161. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sibley, C. G., Fischer, R. & Lui, J. H. (2005). Reliability and validity of the Revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR-R) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1524–1536. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Treger, S. & Sprecher, S. (2011). The influence of sociosexuality and attachment style on reactions to emotional versus sexual infidelity. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 413–422. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vocaturo, L. C. (2000). Predictors of coping styles in response to infidelity among college students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60 (11-B). (UMI No. 9949896). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, C. D., King, M. L. & Debernardi, N. R. (2012). Adult attachment, cognitive appraisal, and university students’ reactions to romantic infidelity. Journal of College Counseling, 15, 101–116. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zeigler-Hill, V., Besser, A. & King, K. (2011). Contingent self-esteem and anticipated reactions to interpersonal rejection and achievement failure. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30, 1069–1096. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar