Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Militant Extremist Mindset and the Assessment of Radicalization in the General Population

Published Online:April 04, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000253

Abstract

Abstract. This paper presents new data and reviews the available evidence pointing to the existence of three main ingredients of militant extremist mindset (MEM). Three different methods of item development identified factors that we have labeled Nastiness, Grudge, and Excuse. In other words, there are in our midst nasty people who are more prepared than others to accept, approve, or even advocate the use of violence. When such people feel a grudge, in that they see somebody as threatening to themselves (or to members of the group they belong to) or think that the world is not a hospitable place in which to live, they may resort to violence. This violence is often accompanied by an excuse or justification that refers to a higher authority or a “noble” principle such as religiosity or utopianism. Although all three ingredients may be open to intervention, Grudge might be the most amenable. Social policies related to immigration and procedures for dealing with protest counterculture may be effective in reducing MEM. The most important, however, is the need to espouse principles of diversity and tolerance.

References

  • Bar-Tal, D., Sharvit, K., Halperin, E. & Zafran, A. (2012). Ethos of conflict: The concept and its measurement. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18, 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026860 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borum, R. (2011). Understanding terrorist psychology. In A. SilkeEd., The psychology of counter-terrorism (pp. 19–33). Oxon, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borum, R. (2014). Psychological vulnerabilities and propensities for involvement in violent extremism. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32, 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2110 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borum, R. (2015). Assessing risk for terrorism involvement. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2, 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000043 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bouchard, T. J. Jr., Segal, N. L., Tellegen, A., McGue, M., Keyes, M. & Krueger, R. (2003). Evidence for the construct validity and heritability of the Wilson-Patterson conservatism scale: A reared-apart twins study of social attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 959–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00080-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Conelly, B. S. & Ones, D. S. (2010). Another perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Evans, G. (2008). The responsibility to protect. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Glasman, L. R. & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 778–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horgan, J. (2005). The psychology of terrorism. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A metaanalysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295211007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kruglanski, A. W. & Fishman, S. (2006). Terrorism between “Syndrome” and “Tool”. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00404.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Međedović, J. & Knežević, G. (2018). Dark and schizotypal features of militant extremist thinking pattern. Manuscript in preparation First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Međedović, J. & Petrović, B. (2016). The militant extremist mind-set as a conservative ideology mediated by ethos of conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22, 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000175 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sageman, M. (2008). Leaderless Jihad: Terror networks in the twenty-first century. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Saucier, G. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 366–385. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Saucier, G., Akers, L. G., Miller, S. S., Stankov, L. & Knežević, G. (2009). Patterns of thinking in militant extremism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01123.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stankov, L. (2016a). Individual differences within the psychological atlas of the world. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.027 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stankov, L. (2016b). Major psychological dimensions of cross-cultural differences: Nastiness, social awareness/morality, religiosity and broad conservatism/liberalism. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stankov, L. (2017). Conservative syndrome: Individual and cross-cultural differences. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117709984 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stankov, L., Higgins, D., Saucier, G. & Knežević, G. (2010). Contemporary militant extremism: A linguistic approach to scale development. Psychological Assessment, 22, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017372 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stankov, L. & Lee, J. (2008). Culture: Ways of thinking and believing. In G. J. BoyleG. MatthewsD. SaklofskeEds., The handbook of personality theory and testing (pp. 560–575). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stankov, L. & Lee, J. (2016a). Toward a psychological atlas of the world with mixture modeling. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 47, 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115611749 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stankov, L. & Lee, J. (2016b). Nastiness, morality and religiosity in 33 nations. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.069 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stankov, L., Saucier, G. & Knežević, G. (2010). Militant extremist mindset: Pro-Violence, vile world, and divine power. Psychological Assessment, 22, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016925 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar