Abstract
Abstract. Tinder is the leading online dating application. This study (N = 271) explored the Dark Triad personality traits (i.e., Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) and sociosexuality as correlates of Tinder use. The results revealed that Tinder users had higher scores on the Dark Triad traits and sociosexuality, compared to non-users. Also, Tinder users with higher scores on the Dark Triad traits and sociosexuality significantly showed greater motivation to use Tinder for short-term mating; however, there was no significant relation with Tinder use and motivation for long-term mating. This finding supports the idea that Tinder can be a new venue for people high on the Dark Triad to pursue their short-term mating strategies.
References
2017). The Dark Triad and three types of jealousy: Its’ relations among heterosexuals and homosexuals involved in a romantic relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.017
(2014). Four shades of sexual fantasies linked to the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.034
(2018). Individual differences in sociosexuality predict picture-based mobile dating app use. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.021
(2018). Dark triad traits and romantic relationship attachment, accommodation, and control. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.008
(1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551914
(1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
(2016). The players of micro-dating: Individual and gender differences in goal orientations toward micro-dating apps. First Monday, 21. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i5.6187
(2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522
(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2010). The dark side of love: Love styles and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.030
(2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short‐term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.698
(2011). Mate-selection and the Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.025
(2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
(2017). Doing psychology with a cultural lens: A half-century journey. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 824–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617700932
(2017). Relational mobility and close relationships: A socioecological approach to explain cross‐cultural differences. Personal Relationships, 24, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12174
(2017). Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517706419
(2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
(2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
(2014). Romantic revenge and the Dark Triad: A model of impellance and inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.018
(2008). The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2124–2157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.003
(2001). The effects of sex and temporal context on feelings of romantic desire: An experimental evaluation of sexual strategies theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277006
(2018a). Brief report: Tinder users are risk takers and have low sexual disgust sensitivity. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0170-8
(2018b). Hookup culture. In T. ShackelfordV. Weekes Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science, Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_217-1
(2017). Exploring the hook-up app: Low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.053
(2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009
(2017). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.026
(