Exogenous Cuing of Distractor Location Facilitates Location Selection by Inhibition of Return
Abstract
Attention capture by an exogenous cue can result in slowed responses to a target, which appeared at that cued location later. This is the phenomenon of inhibition of return (IOR). In the current study, the effect of IOR on performance in a location selection task was studied. A target and a distractor were presented at the same time, and the participants were instructed to indicate the location of the target by manual response. The results showed that it took longer to respond to the target at the cued location. More importantly, it took a shorter time to respond to the target when the distractor was presented at the cued location. These findings support the idea that IOR can facilitate performance in a target selection task if the distractor location is cued.
References
(2001). The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 12, 76–80.
(2002). Disengaging the negative priming mechanism in location tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 207–225.
(2008). When location negative priming meets inhibition of return: Reduction of negative priming effect at the cued location. Submitted for publication.
(2006). Inhibition of return at repeatedly stimulated locations lasts longer than at novel locations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 896–901.
(2008). Controlled processing in single-prime negative priming. Experimental Psychology, 55, 402–408.
(2001). Negative priming for spatial locations? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 24–38.
(1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1467–1475.
(2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
(2005). Negative priming with masked distractor-only prime trials: Awareness modulates negative priming. Experimental Psychology, 52, 131–139.
(2007). On distractor-repetition benefits in the negative-priming paradigm. Visual Cognition, 15, 166–178.
(1999). Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and flanker interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 149–164.
(2004). The influence of distractor-only prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism. Experimental Psychology, 51, 4–14.
(1999). Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing. Psychological Science, 10, 157–161.
(1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In , Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(2003). Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1068–1074.
(1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In , Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences, ((3rd ed.)). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
(1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430–431.
(2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138–147.
(1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346–352.
(1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition, with reference to attention. In , Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(2002). Inhibition of return in temporal order saccades. Visual Research, 42, 2089–2093.
(1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1241–1254.
(2007). Inhibition of return impairs episodic memory access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 696–707.
(1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203–229.
(2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1280–1296.
(2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return (IOR). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1591–1605.
(1991). Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1136–1145.
(1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 613–623.
(1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
(1984). Components of visual orienting. In , Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 673–685.
(2003). Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 897–906.
(2007). The time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IOR. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 327–331.
(2000). Inhibitory tagging to continuous visual stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 927–934.
(1996). Location vs feature: Reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions. Vision Research, 36, 2125–2140.
(2004). Inhibition-of-return and oculomotor interference. Vision Research, 44, 1485–1492.
(2003). Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 616–620.
(1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.
(1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492–504.
(1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591–611.
(2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14, 19–25.
(1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
(1990). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 357–362.
