Visuospatial Perceptual Sequence Learning and Eye Movements
Abstract
We examined perceptual sequence learning by means of an adapted serial reaction time task in which eye movements were unnecessary for performing the sequence learning task. Participants had to respond to the identity of a target letter pair (“OX” or “XO”) appearing in one of four locations. On the other locations, similar distractor letter pairs (“QY” or “YQ”) were shown. While target identity changed randomly, target location was structured according to a deterministic sequence. To render eye movements superfluous, (1) stimulus letter pairs appeared around a fixation cross with a visual angle of 0.63°, which means that they appeared within the foveal visual area and (2) the letter pairs were presented for only 100 ms, a period too short to allow proper eye movements. Reliable sequence knowledge was acquired under these conditions, as responses were both slower and less accurate when the trained sequence was replaced by an untrained sequence. These results support the notion that perceptual sequence learning can be based on shifts of attention without overt oculomotor movements.
References
(2000). Oculocentric coding of inhibited eye movements to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 776–788.
(2006). Implicit oculomotor sequence learning in humans: Time course of offline processing. Brain Research, 1090, 163–171.
(2009). When are attention and saccade preparation dissociated? Psychological Science, 20, 1340–1347.
(1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406–416.
(1998). Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 275–281.
(2001). Development of the functional visual field. Acta Psychologica, 106, 51–68.
(2011). On the automaticity of pure perceptual sequence learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1460–1472.
(2006a). Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures. Psychological Research, 70, 88–102.
(2006b). Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. Experimental Psychology, 53, 16–30.
(2006c). The role of response selection in sequence learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 449–456.
(1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
(2002). Endogenous saccades are preceded by shifts of visual attention: Evidence from cross-saccadic priming effects. Acta Psychologica, 110, 83–102.
(2001). Learning complex sequences: No role for observation? Psychological Research, 65, 15–23.
(2008). Sequence learning at optimal stimulus-response mapping: Evidence from a serial reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 203–209.
(2007). Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: Evidence from stimulus-response compatibility. Human Movement Science, 26, 257–274.
(2006). Oculomotor evidence of sequence learning on the serial reaction time task. Memory & Cognition, 34, 420–432.
(1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 350–364.
(1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task. Psychological Research, 60, 98–112.
(1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
(1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
(2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 581–597.
(2009). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning: A role for visuospatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 528–541.
(2011). Pure perceptual-based learning of second-, third, and fourth-order sequential probabilities. Psychological Research, 75, 307–323.
(1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31–40.
(2002). Influence of stimulus distance in implicit learning of spatial and nonspatial event sequences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 973–987.
(2002). E-prime user's guide (Version 2.0). Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
(2009). Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 270–290.
(2009). Neural evidence of a role for spatial response selection in the learning of spatial sequences. Brain Research, 1247, 114–125.
(2010). Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus-response rules. Memory & Cognition, 38, 677–688.
(1998). Localizing sequential effects in serial choice reaction time with the information reduction procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 547–568.
(1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 598–616.
(2004). Sequence learning and sequential effects. Psychological Research, 69, 124–137.
(2007). The relationship between covert and overt attention in endogenous cuing. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 719–731.
(1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Memory & Cognition, 27, 561–572.
(1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1047–1060.
(1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 962–978.
(2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 595–613.
