Abstract
In the present study we investigated whether a task-irrelevant distractor can induce a visual attentional blink pattern. Participants were asked to detect only a visual target letter (A, B, or C) and to ignore the preceding auditory, visual, or audiovisual distractor. An attentional blink was observed regardless of the distractor modality. The magnitude of the attentional blink was greater when the target was preceded by a visual or an audiovisual distractor than when the target letter was preceded by an auditory distractor. The presence of a distractor-induced attentional blink regardless of the distractor modality suggests that the attentional blink phenomenon is at least partly due to an amodal processing limitation.
References
(2002). Separate and shared sources of dual task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 105–147.
(2004). Revisiting within-modality and cross-modality attentional blinks: Effects of target-distractor similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1147–1161.
(1999). The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 630–648.
(2002). Cross-modality attentional blinks without preparatory task-set switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 497–506.
(2004). Paying attention to meaning. Psychological Science, 15, 179–186.
(2009). Catch the moment: Multisensory enhancement of rapid visual events by sound. Experimental Brain Research, 198, 209–219.
(1997). Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1191–1199.
(1995). A two-stage model for multiple detection in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109–127.
(1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979–992.
(1987). Cross-modal, auditory-visual stroop interference and possible implications for speech memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 393–401.
(2007). Attentional capture in serial audiovisual search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 422–438.
(2006). Attentional blink and selection in the tactile domain. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 537–559.
(1997). Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities. Nature, 387, 808–810.
(2005). The meaning of the mask matters: Evidence of conceptual interference in the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 16, 775–779.
(1998). The nature of cross-modal color-word interference effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 761–767.
(2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 741–753.
(1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1454–1466.
(2006). Within modality and cross modality attentional blinks in a simple discrimination task. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 54–61.
(2002). Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1068–1081.
(2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an Algorithm-Based Neural Model? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 736–749.
(2010). Characteristic sounds make you look at target objects more quickly. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 1736–1741.
(2008). Characteristic sounds facilitate visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 548–554.
(2011). On the labile memory buffer in the attentional blink: Masking the T2 representation by onset transients mediates the AB. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1182–1192.
(1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346–354.
(1987). Repetition blindness – type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117–143.
(2008). Priming T2 in a visual and auditory attentional blink task. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 658–666.
(2004). Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance. Experimental Brain Research, 158, 405–414.
(2010). Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities: An individual differences approach. PLoS One, 5, e15280.
(2000). Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature, 407, 906–908.
(2009). Temporal constraints on conscious vision: On the ubiquitous nature of the attentional blink. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–14.
(2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review, 115, 836–863.
(2008). Bleeping you out of the blink: Sound saves vision from oblivion. Brain Research, 1242, 191–199.
(2011). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119, 374–380.
(1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979–992.
(2002). The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1149–1162.
(1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849–860.
(2002). Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 754–763.
(1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention. In , Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 151–188). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357–371.
(2008). The attention cascade model and attentional blink. Cognitive Psychology, 56, 210–236.
(2002). Modality-specific auditory and visual temporal processing deficits. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 55, 23–40.
(2002). A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 731–738.
(2006). Attentional blink and attentional capture: Endogenous versus exogenous control over paying attention to two important events in close succession. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 674–684.
(2010). Crossmodal spatial attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 182–200.
(1996). Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1005–1030.
(1997). Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1–22.
(1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606.
(2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 123, 77–99.
(2005). Attentional and perceptual sources of the auditory attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 195–208.
(2005). Auditory attentional blink: Masking the second target is necessary, delayed masking is sufficient. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 279–286.
(2006). Delayed masking and the auditory attentional blink – a test for retrieval competition and bottleneck models. Experimental Psychology, 53, 182–190.
(2008). Modality-specific and amodal sources of interference in the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1000–1015.
(2010). Audiovisual semantic interference and attention: Evidence from the attentional blink paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 134, 198–205.
(2010). Efficient visual search from synchronized auditory signals requires transient audiovisual events. PLoS ONE, 5, e10664.
(2007). The absence of an auditory-visual attentional blink is not due to echoic memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1230–1241.
(2008). Pip and pop: Non-spatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1053–1065.
(2004). Rapid serial visual distraction: Task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1418–1432.
(2000). Sound enhances visual perception: Cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1583–1590.
(1981). Auditory-visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones, and gaps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1327–1339.
(
2012 ). The time course of cueing: Two types of enhancement.Manuscript submitted for publication.(2009). Categorically defined targets trigger spatiotemporal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 787–807.
