Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Research Article

Enhancing Majority Members’ Pro-Diversity Beliefs in Small Teams

The Facilitating Effect of Self-Anchoring

Published Online:January 01, 2014https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000220

Abstract

Majority members often react negatively to efforts to stimulate diversity. An important reason for this is that in diverse groups, majority members’ own group bond is typically based on perceived prototypicality, which serves to disregard those who are different. In the present research we investigate how majority members’ pro-diversity beliefs may be enhanced, by experimentally manipulating how the self is cognitively defined in relation to a diverse group. Specifically, we hypothesize that majority members’ focus on the personal self (i.e., self-anchoring) rather than the social self (i.e., self-stereotyping) when creating a group bond may facilitate their pro-diversity beliefs and positive attitudes toward minority members. In two experiments we manipulated self-anchoring and self-stereotyping via mindset priming among ethnic majority members in diverse teams. As expected, results showed that relative to self-stereotyping, majority members’ self-anchoring enhanced pro-diversity beliefs and positive attitudes toward minority members.

References

  • Berry, J. W. , Kalin, R. (1995). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada: An overview of the 1991 national survey. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 27, 301–320. doi: 10.1037/0008-400X.27.3.301 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bianchi, M. , Machunsky, M. , Steffens, M. C. , Mummendey, A. (2009). Like me or like us: Is ingroup projection just social projection?. Experimental Psychology, 56, 198–205. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.198 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Cadinu, M. R. , Rothbart, M. (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661–677. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.661 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Crisp, R. J. , Meleady, R. (2012). Adapting to a multicultural future. Science, 336, 853–855. doi: 10.1126/science.129009 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Eurostat (2011). 6.5% of the EU population are foreigners and 9.4% are born abroad – Issue number 34/2011. Retrieved from epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/population/publications/migration_asylum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hamilton, B. L. (1977). An empirical investigation of the effects of heterogeneous regression slopes in analysis of covariance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 701–712. doi: 10.1177/001316447703700313 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106–1115. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1106 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Higgins, E. T. , King, G. A. , Mavin, G. H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 35–47. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.35 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Homan, A. C. , Greer, L. L. , Jehn, K. A. , Koning, L. (2010). Believing shapes seeing: The impact of diversity beliefs on the construal of group composition. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 477–493. doi: 10.1177/1368430209350747 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hornsey, M. J. , Jetten, J. , McAuliffe, B. J. , Hogg, M. A. (2006). The impact of individualist and collectivist group norms on evaluations of dissenting group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp. 2005.01.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hutchison, P. , Jetten, J. , Gutierrez, R. (2011). Deviant but desirable: Group variability and evaluation of atypical group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp. 2011.06.011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jans, L. , Postmes, T. , Van der Zee, K. I. (2011). The induction of a shared identity: The positive role of individual distinctiveness in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1130–1141. doi: 10.1177/0146167211407342 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Jansen, W. S. , Otten, S. , van der Zee, K. I. , Vos, M. W. , Smith, L. (2012). The development and validation of the perceived organizational inclusion scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jetten, J. , Postmes, T. , McAuliffe, B. J. (2002). “We’re all individuals”: Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189–207. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.65 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Joppke, C. (2004). The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: Theory and policy. British Journal of Sociology, 55, 237–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2004.00017.x First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Kauff, M. , Wagner, U. (2012). Valuable therefore not threatening: The influence of diversity beliefs on discrimination against immigrants. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 714–721. doi: 10.1177/1948550611435942 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krueger, J. I. (2007). From social projection to social behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 1–35. doi: 10.1080/10463280701284645 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krueger, J. , Clement, R. W. (1996). Inferring category characteristics from sample characteristics: Inductive reasoning and social projection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 52–68. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.52 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Krueger, J. I. , DiDonato, T. E. (2008). Social categorization and the perception of groups and group differences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 733–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00083.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krueger, J. , Zeiger, J. S. (1993). Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 670–680. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.670 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Landis, J. R. , Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Leach, C. W. , Ellemers, N. , Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Leach, C. W. , van Zomeren, M. , Zebel, S. , Vliek, M. L. W. , Pennekamp, S. F. , Doosje, B. , … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Luijters, K. , van der Zee, K. I. , Otten, S. (2008). Cultural diversity in organizations: Enhancing identification by valuing differences. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 154–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.09.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Machunsky, M. , Meiser, T. , Mummendey, A. (2009). On the crucial role of mental ingroup representation for ingroup bias and the ingroup prototypicality-ingroup bias link. Experimental Psychology, 56, 156–164. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.156 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Mussweiler, T. (2001). Focus of comparison as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast in social comparison. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 38–47. doi: 10.1177/0146167201271004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Otten, S. (2004). Self-anchoring as predictor of in-group favoritism: Is it applicable to real group contexts?. Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 427–443. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Otten, S. (2005). The ingroup as part of the self: Reconsidering the link between social categorization, ingroup favoritism, and the self-concept. In M. D. Alicke, D. A. Dunning, J. I. Krueger (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 241–265). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Otten, S. , Wentura, D. (2001). Self-anchoring and in-group favoritism: An individual profiles analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 525–532. doi: 10.1006/jesp. 2001.1479 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Plaut, V. C. , Garnett, F. G. , Buffardi, L. E. , Sanchez-Burks, J. (2011). “What about me?” perceptions of exclusion and whites’ reactions to multiculturalism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 337–353. doi: 10.1037/a0022832 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Riketta, M. , Sacramento, C. A. (2008). “They cooperate with us, so they are like me”: Perceived intergroup relationship moderates projection from self to outgroups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 115–131. doi: 10.1177/1368430207084849 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Robbins, J. M. , Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32–47. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Sanchez-Burks, J. , Nisbett, R. E. , Ybarra, O. (2000). Cultural styles, relationship schemas, and prejudice against out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 174–189. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.174 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Sidanius, J. , Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stangor, C. , Lynch, L. , Duan, C. , Glas, B. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 207–218. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.207 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. , Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel, W. G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Montery, CA: Brooks/Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, K. M. , Plaut, V. C. (2008). The many faces of diversity resistance in the workplace. In K. M. Thomas, K. M. Thomas (Eds.), Diversity resistance in organizations (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tropp, L. R. , Bianchi, R. A. (2006). Valuing diversity and interest in intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 533–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00472.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tropp, L. R. , Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600. doi: 10.1177/0146167201275007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A. , Oakes, P. J. , Reicher, S. D. , Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van der Schalk, D. S. , Hawk, S. T. , Fischer, A. H. , Doosje, B. (2011). Moving faces, looking places: Validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES). Emotion, 11, 907–920. doi: 10.1037/a0023853 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Van Knippenberg, D. , de Dreu, C. K. W. , Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022. doi: 10.1177/0018726708095711 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Van Knippenberg, D. , Haslam, S. A. , Platow, M. J. (2007). Unity through diversity: Value-in-diversity beliefs, work group diversity, and group identification. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 207–222. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.207 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Veelen, R. , Otten, S. , Hansen, N. (2011). Linking self and ingroup: Self-anchoring as distinctive cognitive route to social identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 628–637. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.792 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van Veelen, R. , Otten, S. , Hansen, N. (2012a). Social identification when an ingroup identity is unclear: The role of self-anchoring and self-stereotyping. British Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.111/j.2044-8309.2012.02110.x First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Veelen, R. , Otten, S. , Hansen, N. (2012b). A personal touch to diversity: Self-anchoring increases minority members’ identification in a diverse group. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1368430212473167 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Verkuyten, M. (2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121–138. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.121 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Verkuyten, M. (2011). Assimilation ideology and outgroup attitudes among ethnic majority members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 789–806. doi: 10.1177/1368430211398506 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Waldzus, S. , Mummendey, A. , Wenzel, M. , Boettcher, F. (2004). Of bikers, teachers and Germans: Groups’ diverging views about their prototypicality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 385–400. doi: 10.1348/0144666042037944 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Wenzel, M. , Mummendey, A. , Waldzus, S. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331–372. doi: 10.1080/10463280701728302 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wenzel, M. , Mummendey, A. , Weber, U. , Waldzus, S. (2003). The ingroup as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 461–473. doi: 10.1177/0146167202250913 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Wolsko, C. , Park, B. , Judd, C. M. (2006). Considering the tower of Babel: Correlates of assimilation and multiculturalism among ethnic minority and majority groups in the United States. Social Justice Research, 19, 277–306. doi: 10/1007/s11211-006-0014-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar