Does Viotin Activate Violin More Than Viocin?
On the Use of Visual Cues During Visual-Word Recognition
Abstract
The vast majority of neural and computational models of visual-word recognition assume that lexical access is achieved via the activation of abstract letter identities. Thus, a word’s overall shape should play no role in this process. In the present lexical decision experiment, we compared word-like pseudowords like viotín (same shape as its base word: violín) vs. viocín (different shape) in mature (college-aged skilled readers), immature (normally reading children), and immature/impaired (young readers with developmental dyslexia) word-recognition systems. Results revealed similar response times (and error rates) to consistent-shape and inconsistent-shape pseudowords for both adult skilled readers and normally reading children – this is consistent with current models of visual-word recognition. In contrast, young readers with developmental dyslexia made significantly more errors to viotín-like pseudowords than to viocín-like pseudowords. Thus, unlike normally reading children, young readers with developmental dyslexia are sensitive to a word’s visual cues, presumably because of poor letter representations.
References
(1998). Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1705–1719. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1705
(2009). LEXIN: A lexical database from Spanish kindergarten and first-grade readers. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1009–1017. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1009
(1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from www.pc.rhul.ac.uk/staff/c.davis/Thesis/thesis.zip.
(2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. doi: 10.1037/a0019738
(2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665–671. doi: 10.3758/BF03192738
(2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335–341. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
(2003). Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Psychological Science, 15, 307–313. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00674.x
(1995). Phases of development in learning to read by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1995.tb00077.x
(1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680
(2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124. doi: 10.3758/BF03195503
(2012). Letter position dyslexia in Arabic: From form to position. Behavioural Neurology, 25, 193–203. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2012-119004
(1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In , Surface dyslexia (pp. 287–295). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
(2009). Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325, 280–e283. doi: 10.1126/science.1171999
(2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1–35. doi: 10.1080/01690960701578013
(2008). Letter perception: From pixels to pandemonium. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 381–387. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.006
(1987). Reading without letters?. In , The cognitive neuropsychology of language (pp. 27–58). London, UK: Erlbaum.
(2004). Negative congruence effects in letter and pseudo-letter recognition: The role of similarity and response conflict. Cognitive Processing, 5, 239–248. doi: 10.1007/s10339-004-0032-0
(2007). Paradoxical enhancement of letter recognition in developmental dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 31, 61–77. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn3101_4
(2008). Different letter-processing strategies in diagnostic subgroups of developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 730–744. doi: 10.1080/02643290802309514
(2011). Whole-word shape effect in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 443–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01444.x
(1996). Case mixing and the task-sensitive disruption of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 278–294. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.278
(1984). Word shape’s in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 413–428. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.413
(2013). Early access to abstract representations in developing readers: Evidence from masked priming. Developmental Science, 16, 564–573. doi: 10.1111/desc.12052
(2012). Does the advantage of the upper part of words occur at the lexical level?. Memory and Cognition, 8, 1257–1265. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0219-z
(2012). The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learning and Instruction, 22, 420–430. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.001
(2002). Does “whole word shape” play a role in visual word recognition?. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 785–794. doi: 10.3758/BF03194745
(1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 785–794. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.785
(1999). Evaluación de los procesos de lectura en alumnos del tercer ciclo de educación primaria y educación secundaria obligatoria (PROLEC-SE). Madrid, Spain: TEA.
(2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159–182. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.159
(1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206–226. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90009-2
(2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.001
(1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 19, 744–774. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.744
(2009). The long learning route to abstract letter units. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 50–69. doi: 10.1080/02643290802200838
(1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1269–1291. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.6.1269
(2011). Context effects on orthographic learning of regular and irregular words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 39–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.11.005
(2006). It’s what’s on the outside that matters: An advantage for external features in children’s word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 163–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.01.005
(2001). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Revised (Spanish adaptation). Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.
(1990). Young children’s acquisition of alphabet knowledge. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 277–295. doi: 10.1080/10862969009547711
