Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Research Article

Individual Differences in Uncertainty Tolerance Are not Associated With Cognitive Control Functions in the Flanker Task

Published Online:August 31, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000408

Abstract

Abstract. Cognitive control refers to the ability to make correct decisions concurrent to distracting information, and to adapt to conflicting stimulus configurations, eventually promoting goal-directed behavior. Previous research has linked individual differences in cognitive control to psychopathological conditions such as anxiety. However, a link with uncertainty tolerance (UT) has not been tested so far, although both constructs describe cognitive and behavioral performance in ambiguous situations, thus they share some similarities. We probed cognitive control in web-based experimentation (jsPsych) with a simple flanker task (N = 111) and a version without confounds in episodic memory (N = 116). Both experiments revealed two well-established behavioral indices: congruency effects (CEs) and congruency-sequence effects (CSEs). Only small-to-zero correlations emerged between CEs, UT, and need for cognitive closure (NCC), a personality trait inversely related to UT. A subtle correlation (r = .18) was noted in Experiment 2 between NCC and CSE. Throughout, Bayesian analyses provided anecdotal-to-moderate evidence for the null-hypotheses.

References

  • Abrahamse, E. L., Ruitenberg, M., Duthoo, W., Sabbe, B., Morrens, M. & van Dijck, J.-P. (2016). Conflict adaptation in schizophrenia: reviewing past and previewing future efforts. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 21, 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2016.1167679 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Borkovec, T. D., Ray, W. J. & Stober, J. (1998). Worry: A cognitive phenomenon intimately linked to affective, physiological, and interpersonal behavioral processes. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018790003416 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S. & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Braem, S., Duthoo, W. & Notebaert, W. (2013). Punishment sensitivity predicts the impact of punishment on cognitive control. PLoS One, 8, e74106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074106 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Clawson, A., Clayson, P. E. & Larson, M. J. (2013). Cognitive control adjustments and conflict adaptation in major depressive disorder. Psychophysiology, 50, 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12066 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Cools, E. & Van den Broeck, H. (2007). The hunt for the heffalump continues: Can trait and cognitive characteristics predict entrepreneurial orientation? Journal of Small Business Strategy, 18, 23–41. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.005 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One, 8, e57410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Cyders, M. A. & Coskunpinar, A. (2012). The relationship between self-report and lab task conceptualizations of impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.11.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dalbert, C. (1999). Die Ungewißheitstoleranzskala: Skaleneigenschaften und Validierungsbefunde [Tolerance of Ambiguity Scale: Scale characteristics and validity]. Hallesche Berichte zur Pädagogischen Psychologie, 25. Halle, Germany. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11780/927 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • de Leeuw, J. R. & Motz, B. A. (2016). Psychophysics in a Web browser? Comparing response times collected with JavaScript and Psychophysics Toolbox in a visual search task. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0567-2 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Dignath, D. & Eder, A. B. (2015). Stimulus conflict triggers behavioral avoidance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 822–836. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0355-6 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Dignath, D., Janczyk, M. & Eder, A. B. (2017). Phasic valence and arousal do not influence post-conflict adjustments in the Simon task. Acta Psychologica, 174, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.004 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Dignath, D., Kiesel, A. & Eder, A. B. (2015). Flexible conflict management: Conflict avoidance and conflict adjustment in reactive cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000089 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Dreisbach, G. & Fischer, R. (2012). Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition, 78, 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.12.003 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Dugas, M. J., Gagnon, F., Ladouceur, R. & Freeston, M. H. (1998). Generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary test of a conceptual model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00070-3 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N. & Notebaert, W. (2014a). The congruency sequence effect 3.0: A critical test of conflict adaptation. PLoS One, 9, e110462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110462 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N. & Notebaert, W. (2014b). The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: An update. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1001. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01001 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Edwards, W., Lindman, H. & Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 193–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044139 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Egner, T. & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784–1790. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1594 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Eriksen, B. A. & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Etkin, A. & Schatzberg, A. F. (2011). Common abnormalities and disorder-specific compensation during implicit regulation of emotional processing in generalized anxiety and major depressive disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 968–978. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10091290 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Fischer, R., Plessow, F., Dreisbach, G. & Goschke, T. (2015). Individual differences in the context-dependent recruitment of cognitive control: Evidence from action versus state orientation. Journal of Personality, 83, 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12140 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Freeston, M. H., Rhéaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M. J. & Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90048-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1949). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18, 108–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Furnham, A. & Marks, J. (2013). Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Recent Literature. Psychology, 4, 717–728. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.49102 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Furnham, A. & Ribchester, T. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Current Psychology, 14, 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686907 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goschke, T. (2014). Dysfunctions of decision-making and cognitive control as transdiagnostic mechanisms of mental disorders: Advances, gaps, and needs in current research. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(Suppl 1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1410 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D. & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Jackson, F., Nelson, B. D. & Hajcak, G. (2016). The uncertainty of errors: Intolerance of uncertainty is associated with error-related brain activity. Biological Psychology, 113, 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.11.007 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Janczyk, M. & Leuthold, H. (2017). Effector system-specific sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1311-y First citation in articleMedline, Google Scholar

  • JASP Team. (2016). JASP. (Version 0.7.5.5) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kanske, P. & Kotz, S. A. (2012). Effortful control, depression, and anxiety correlate with the influence of emotion on executive attentional control. Biological Psychology, 91, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.04.007 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Koerner, N. & Dugas, M. J. (2008). An investigation of appraisals in individuals vulnerable to excessive worry: The role of intolerance of uncertainty. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-007-9125-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ladouceur, R., Talbot, F. & Dugas, M. J. (1997). Behavioral expressions of intolerance of uncertainty in worry experimental findings. Behavior Modification, 21, 355–371. https://doi.org/0803973233 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Lakens, D. & Evers, E. R. K. (2014). Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability: Practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528520 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Larson, M. J., Clawson, A., Clayson, P. E. & Baldwin, S. A. (2013). Cognitive conflict adaptation in generalized anxiety disorder. Biological Psychology, 94, 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.08.006 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Lesh, T. A., Niendam, T. A., Minzenberg, M. J. & Carter, C. S. (2011). Cognitive control deficits in schizophrenia: mechanisms and meaning. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36, 316–338. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.156 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Leue, A., Lange, S. & Beauducel, A. (2012). Modulation of the conflict monitoring intensity: The role of aversive reinforcement, cognitive demand, and trait-BIS. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 287–307. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0086-x First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Luhmann, C. C., Ishida, K. & Hajcak, G. (2011). Intolerance of uncertainty and decisions about delayed, probabilistic rewards. Behavior Therapy, 42, 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.09.002 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Mayr, U., Awh, E. & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1051 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • McEvoy, P. M. & Mahoney, A. E. J. (2012). To be sure, to be sure: Intolerance of uncertainty mediates symptoms of various anxiety disorders and depression. Behavior Therapy, 43, 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.02.007 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • McLaughlin, K. A., Mennin, D. S. & Farach, F. J. (2007). The contributory role of worry in emotion generation and dysregulation in generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1735–1752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2006.12.004 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Miller, E. K. & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Miller, J. & Ulrich, R. (2013). Mental chronometry and individual differences: Modeling reliabilities and correlations of reaction time means and effect sizes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 819–858. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0404-5 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Nigbur, R., Schneider, J., Sommer, W., Dimigen, O. & Stürmer, B. (2015). Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: An ERP study with visual probes. NeuroImage, 107, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.052 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Plewnia, C., Schroeder, P. A. & Wolkenstein, L. (2015). Targeting the biased brain: Non-invasive brain stimulation to ameliorate cognitive control. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2, 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00056-5 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Reips, U.-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.49.4.243 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F. & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sawyer, J. E. (1990). Effects of risk and ambiguity on judgments of contingency relations and behavioral resource allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90006-U First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schlink, S. & Walther, E. (2007). Kurz und gut: Eine deutsche Kurzskala zur Erfassung des Bedürfnisses nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit [Short and good: A German short scale to measure need for cognitive closure]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie [Journal of Social Psychology], 38, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.38.3.153 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, J. R. & Weissman, D. H. (2014). Congruency sequence effect without feature integration and contingency learning. PLoS One, 9, e102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.03.004 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Schroeder, P. A., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., Nuerk, H.-C. & Plewnia, C. (2016). Counteracting implicit conflicts by electrical inhibition of the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 1737–1748. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Shaffer, D. R., Hendrick, C., Regula, C. R. & Freconna, J. (1973). Interactive effects of ambiguity tolerance and task effort on dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality, 41, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1973.tb00090.x First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Soutschek, A., Müller, H. J. & Schubert, T. (2013). Conflict-specific effects of accessory stimuli on cognitive control in the stroop task and the Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 60, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000181 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Soutschek, A. & Schubert, T. (2013). Domain-specific control mechanisms for emotional and nonemotional conflict processing. Cognition, 126, 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.004 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Stahl, C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., Nuszbaum, M., Tüscher, O., Lieb, K. & Klauer, K. C. (2014). Behavioral components of impulsivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 850–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033981 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H. & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1345 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • van Steenbergen, H. & Bocanegra, B. R. (2016). Promises and pitfalls of Web-based experimentation in the advance of replicable psychological science: A reply to Plant (2015). Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1713–1717. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0677-x First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., Verhagen, J. & Ly, A. (2016). How to quantify the evidence for the absence of a correlation. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 413–426. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0593-0 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Webster, D. M. & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J. & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 2022–2037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037454 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Wetzels, R. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0295-x First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Wiers, R. W., Gladwin, T. E., Hofmann, W., Salemink, E. & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2013). Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: Mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702612466547 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar