Mere Exposure Effect Is Sometimes Insensitive to Mood Inductions
Abstract
Abstract. The mere exposure effect (MEE) is defined as repeated exposures to a stimulus enhancing affective evaluations of that stimulus (Zajonc, 1968). The three prominent explanations of the MEE are Zajonc's “neophobia” account, the uncertainty reduction account, and the perceptual fluency approach. Zajonc's “neophobia” account posits that people have an inherent low level of fear of novel objects and exposure to the objects partially extinguishes this novelty-based fear. The uncertainty reduction account asserts that people find uncertainty aversive and habituation reduces uncertainty. The fluency account postulates that people “like” representations of things with which they are fluent. In four experiments, we induced positive and negative moods before or after target exposures. In addition to assessing the MEE in each condition, we assessed the mood induction. The central hypothesis assessed in this series was that there would be an interaction between mood and the MEE. Although the three accounts of the MEE generated divergent predictions, none of the accounts were well supported by the data. Tests for mood induction demonstrated the efficacy of the induction procedures and the MEE was consistently observed, but Bayesian analysis indicated that at least in the present preparation mood had no effect on the MEE.
References
(1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Hemisphere.
(1996). Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 665–679. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.665
(2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Affect in social thinking and behavior (pp. 65–84). Psychology Press.
(1996). Mood and stereotyping: Affective states and the use of general knowledge structures. European Review of Social Psychology, 7(1), 63–93. 10.1080/14792779443000102
(1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 621–632. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.621
(1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 45–62. 10.1002/ejsp.2420240104
(1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265–289. 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
(1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 545–552. 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545
(2012). Inhibition of fear by learned safety signals: A mini-symposium review. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(41), 14118–14124. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3340-12.2012
(2002). Affect as embodied information. Psychological Inquiry, 13(1), 37–45. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-10335-004
(2010). Happiness cools the warm glow of familiarity: Psychophysiological evidence that mood modulates the familiarity-affect link. Psychological Science, 21(3), 321–328. 10.1177/0956797609359878
(2013). Exposure is not enough: Suppressing stimuli from awareness can abolish the mere exposure effect. PLoS One, 8(10), e77726. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077726
(2009). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 238–257. 10.1177/1088868309352251
(2010). Affective biases in likelihood perception: A possible role of experimental demand in mood. International Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 93–110. https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2010-1-page-93.htm
(2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th edn). SAGE.
(2002). Feeling and doing: Affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 13(1), 1–28. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1301_01
(2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 889–898. 10.1177/0146167201277011
(2013). The mere exposure effect is modulated by selective attention but not visual awareness. Vision Research, 91, 56–61. 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.017
(2018). The mere exposure effect for visual image. Memory & Cognition, 46(2), 181–190. 10.3758/s13421-017-0756-6
(1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(2), 126–135. 10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.126
(2012). The mere exposure effect in the domain of haptics. PLoS One, 7(2), e31215. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031215
. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/
(2012). Feeling good and feeling truth: The interactive effects of mood and processing fluency on truth judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 481–485. 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.006
(2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge University Press.
(2016). Neurophysiological evidence that perceptions of fluency produce mere exposure effects. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(4), 754–767. 10.3758/s13415-016-0428-1
(2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11(6), 462–466. 10.1111/1467-9280.00289
(2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 459–498. 10.1037/bul0000085
(1995). Additivity of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 589–602. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.589
(1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723–739. 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
(2009). Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 92(2), 135–138. 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.09.012
(1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. BlackW. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
(1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 493–502. 10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.493
(1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. HigginsR. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527–561). Guilford Press.
(2002). Situated cognition and the wisdom in feelings: Cognitive tuning. In L. F. BarrettP. Salovey (Eds.), The wisdom in feeling: Psychological processes in emotional intelligence (pp. 144–166). Guilford Press.
(2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3–4), 296–303. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_20
(1975). Effects of “mere exposure” on learning and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(1), 7–12. 10.1037/h0076165
(2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
(2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 39–63. 10.1037/a0014678
(2004). The mere exposure effect and recognition memory. Cognition and Emotion, 18(8), 1055–1078. 10.1080/02699930341000374
(2003). Cognitive and affective consequences of visual fluency: When seeing is easy on the mind. In L. M. ScottR. Batra (Eds.), Advertising and consumer psychology. Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective (pp. 75–89). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, pt. 2), 1–27. 10.1037\h002584810.1037/h0025848
(2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228. 10.1111/1467-8721.00154
(2014). How does this make you feel? A comparison of four affect induction procedures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 689. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00689
(2013). Eliminating the mere exposure effect through changes in context between exposure and test. Cognition & Emotion, 27(8), 1345–1358. 10.1080/02699931.2013.775110
