The Impact of Depth of Encoding on the Transfer of Test Enhanced Learning
Abstract
Abstract. The mediator effectiveness hypothesis states the benefit of retrieval practice is a consequence of the activation of mediators linking cue and target items during review. Evidence has found that mediators are more effective at prompting recall of target words than words not associated with the original cue, a pattern that is larger following testing than restudy. The benefit of testing for unstudied cues at the final test is referred to as transfer of test-enhanced learning. The current study examined whether the activation of mediators is moderated by the depth of processing completed at encoding. During an initial study of weakly related word pairs (e.g., Mother–CHILD), participants completed an encoding task that directed deep, shallow, or no specific depth of processing. During review, participants restudied the pairs or attempted to recall the target given the original cue (e.g., Mother). On the final test, participants were presented with unstudied cues that were related to either the original cue (mediators, e.g., Father) or the target (target-related cues, e.g., Baby). The results found mediator generation during review to be greatly impaired by shallow processing tasks completed during encoding. In contrast, the effectiveness of target-related cues was not affected by depth of processing tasks.
References
(2017). The testing effect under divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 43(12), 1934–1947. 10.1037/xlm0000427
(2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1547–1552. 10.1037/a0024140
(2017). Does testing increase spontaneous mediation in learning semantically related paired associates? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1768–1778. 10.1037/xlm0000414
(2016). The testing effect for mediator final test cues and related final test cues in online and laboratory experiments. BMC Psychology, 4(25), 1–14. 10.1186/s40359-016-0127-2
(1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
(1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268–294. 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
(2022). The impact of depth of encoding on the transfer of test enhanced learning. 10.17605/OSF.IO/5SJKV
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. 10.3758/bf03193146
(1974). Levels of processing in word recognition and subsequent free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(1), 101–105. 10.1037/h0035694
(2022) Effect size–a quick guide. SPSS Tutorials. https://www.spss-tutorials.com/effect-size/
(2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 528–558. 10.1080/09541440601056620
(2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471–479. 10.1080/09658210802647009
(2002). Levels of processing, transfer-appropriate processing, and the concept of robust encoding. Memory, 10(5-6), 397–403. 10.1080/09658210244000225
(1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(2), 371–385. 10.1037/0278-7393.11.2.371
(2019). Retrieval practice in classroom settings: A review of applied research. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 5. 10.3389/feduc.2019.00005
(1976). Depth of processing, retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 15(4), 447–458. 10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90040-2
(1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
(2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 710–756. 10.1037/bul0000151
(2010). Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330(6002), 335. 10.1126/science.1191465
(2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
(2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. 10.1037/a0037559
